Case law

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Davenport

334 Or. 298 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 27, 2002

Caha v. United States, 152 US 211, 215 , 14 S Ct 513 , 38 L Ed 415 (1894). … Keys, 95 F3d 874 (9th Cir 1996); United States v.

Hult v. Ebinger

222 Or. 169 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 25, 1960

Brown v. Crawford, 252 F 248 (DC Or., 1918). Again, when one has a moral duty or at least a moral privilege to pay the debt of another he will be granted the right of subrogation. … Emmert v. Thompson, 49 Minn 386, 52 NW 31 (1892); Gans v. Thieme, 93 NY 225 (1883); Warford v. Hankins, 150 Ind 489, 50 NE 468 (1898); Kent v. Bailey, 181 Iowa 489 , 164 NW 852 (1917); Smith v.

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Eadie

333 Or. 42 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 6, 2001

Dist. v. Oreg. … Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (A103506) (S48878X174 Or App 611) Goodwin, Markv. Thompson (A104968)(S48653)(174Or App 564) Hayes v.

Hyundai Semiconductor America v. City of Eugene

332 Or. 293 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 6, 2001

See Felder v. Casey, 487 US 131, 141 , 108 S Ct 2302 , 101 L Ed 2d 123 (1988) (prohibiting states from applying notice-of-claim requirement to section 1983 actions in its courts); Patsy v. … Relying on Fair Assessment in Real Estate Ass’n v.

State v. Henderson

182 Or. 147 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 24, 1947

As I approached these cars I observed a man about 30 years of age, no hat, about 160 lbs. wearing a light brown overcoat get into a car on the left hand side. … In State v.

State v. Duggan

215 Or. 151 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 31, 1958

In Anderson ex rel Poe v. … In State v.

Lane v. First National Bank

131 Or. 350 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 17, 1929

Co. v. Johnston , 133 U.S. 566 , 576 , and Western German Bank v. Norvell , 134 Fed. 724 . The note was paid on October 21, 1925, and on the 24th the bank closed its doors and ceased to do business. … The same contention was made in the case of Hawaiian Pineapple Co. v. Brown , 60 Mont. 140 ( 220 P. 114 ), which in some of its features resembles the case at bar.

Lorenz v. Pilsener Brewing Co. of Ore.

159 Or. 552 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 24, 1938

In Oregon Lumber & Fuel Co. v. … They cite McNulty Bros. v. Offerman, 221 N. Y. 98 ( 116 N. E. 775 ); P. Grassi & Bros., Inc., v. Lovisa & Pistoresi, Inc., et al., 259 N. Y. 417 ( 182 N. E. 68 , 83 A. L. R. 1149), and Boyer v.

State Ex Rel. Heinig v. City of Milwaukie

231 Or. 473 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 25, 1962

City of Portland v. Welch, 154 Or at 295.” Schmidt v. … Rodman, 172 Okl 630, 46 P2d 334 (1935) (discharge of firemen); State ex rel Geake v. Fox, 158 Ind 126, 63 NE 19 (1902) (statute creating municipal board to administer fire department held void); Popper v.

CUDD v. Aschenbrenner

233 Or. 272 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 19, 1962

State v. … State v.

House v. State Industrial Accident Commission

167 Or. 257 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 16, 1941

The case of Middlebusher v. … “The industrial accident board shall have jurisdiction over all controversies arising out of injuries suffered without the territorial limits of this state, in those cases where the injured employe is a resident of this state

Powell St. I, LLC v. Multnomah Cnty. Assessor

365 Or. 245 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 25, 2019

Taxpayer appealed to the Multnomah County Board of Property Tax Appeals, which found the same value. … Bylund v.

State v. Moran

15 Or. 262 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 14, 1887

Soto, 49 Cal. 67 ; Rud v. Clark, 47 Cal. 195 ; State v. Squires, 48 Cal. 364 ; Redd v. State, 69 Ala. 255 .) In Redd v. … So in State v.

State v. Fessenden / Dicke

355 Or. 759 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 7, 2014

State v. … State v. Brown, 301 Or 286, 278 n 6, 721 P2d 1357 (1986); see also State v.

Rose v. Portland Traction Co.

219 Or. 1 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 18, 1959

Birks v. East Side Transfer Co., supra; see, also, Bernaski v. Liudahl, 209 Or 553 , 307 P2d 510 . … A child crossed a public street when such a bus was stopped, but not for the purpose of either boarding or leaving the bus.

State v. Phillips

367 Or. 594 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 4, 2021

See State v. … See State v.

Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Department of Revenue

300 Or. 637 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 1, 1986

See Trebesch v. Employment Division, 300 Or 264 , 710 P2d 136 (1985); Springfield Education Assn. v. School Dist., 290 Or 217 , 621 P2d 547 (1980). … Bronson, Staff Counsel of the California Franchise Tax Board.

Dearborn v. Real Estate Agency

334 Or. 493 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 6, 2002

No. 509-J v. FDAB, 311 Or 389 , 393 n 7, 812 P2d 1384 (1991) (unchallenged findings of fact in agency order are considered to be facts for purposes of judicial review). … It contends that the provision must be read in the context of ORS 670.280, which provides: *503 “Except as provided in ORS 342.143 or 342.175, no licensing board shall deny, suspend or revoke an occupational or professional

AAA Oregon/Idaho Auto Source, LLC v. State

363 Or. 411 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 2, 2018

State v. Sagdal , 356 Or. 639 , 642, 343 P.3d 226 (2015) ; Couey v. … See generally *77 Springfield Utility Board v.

Layman v. State Unemployment Compensation Commission

167 Or. 379 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 17, 1941

No doubt the Pennsylvania court, for example, in Froehly v. … In Polich v. Anderson-Robinson Co., 227 Iowa 553 , 288 N.