Case law

Simmons v. HOLM

229 Or. 373 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 22, 1961

Sutton v. … Racette, 118 Kan 670, 236 P 811 , 42 ALR 571 ; Goodaile v. Board of Comm’rs & Wilson, 11 Kan 542, 207 P 785 ; Barton v. King County, 18 Wash2d 573, 139 P2d 1020 ; and Lyke v.

Sutherland v. Wickey

133 Or. 266 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 5, 1929

J. 1155; Kamboris v. O.-W. R. & N. Co., 75 Or. 358 ( 146 P. 1097 ); Adskim v. O.-W. R. & N. Co., 129 Or. 169, 174 ( 276 P. 1094 ); Mutzenbecher v. Ballard, above. … Brown and Rossman, JJ., concur. Bean, J., dissents. Belt, McBride.and Rand, JJ., did not participate in this opinion.

State v. Laundy

103 Or. 443 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 11, 1922

Townsend, 60 Or. 223, 231 ( 118 Pac. 1020 ); State v. Runyon, 62 Or. 246, 250 ( 126 Pac. 259 ); State v. Scott, 63 Or. 444, 446 ( 128 Pac. 441 ); State v. Brown, 64 Or. 473, 475 ( 130 Pac. 985 ); State v. … In Brown v. New Jersey, 175 U. S. 172 , ( 44 L. Ed. 119 , 20 Sup. Ct. Rep. 77, see, also, Rose’s U. S.

French v. Christner

173 Or. 158 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 18, 1944

In Egan v. E. A. Brown Co., 193 Minn. 165 , 258 N. W. 161 , plaintiff was an employee of a farmer and was injured at defendant’s grain elevator where he had gone for the purpose of hauling grain. *176 Smith v. … See Cary v.

State v. Althouse

Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 16, 2016

See State v. … Harmelin v.

Smith v. Chipman

220 Or. 188 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 13, 1960

This book was bound in blue boards and it came to be popularly known in Oregon during the years from 1843 to 1849 by familiar desig *195 nation as the Blue Book. … Hall v. Marshall was a suit to foreclose two chattel mortgages which described a band of sheep.

Adams v. Perry

168 Or. 132 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 3, 1942

La Follett v. Mitchell, 42 Or. 465 , 69 P. 916 , 95 Am. St. Rep. 780 ; Ruckman v. Union Railway Co., 45 Or. 578 , 78 P. 748 , 69 L. R. A. 480; First Nat. Bank of Burns v. … See also Abel v. Mack, 131 Or. 586 , 595, 283 P. 8 , and authorities there cited.

Winklebleck v. City of Portland

147 Or. 226 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 7, 1934

Co. v. Ochoco Irrigation District, 108 Or. 1 ( 210 P. 873 , 216 P. 189 ); White v. City of Seaside, 107 Or. 330 ( 213 P. 892 ); State ex rel. v. Funk, 105 Or. 134 ( 199 P. 592 , 209 P. 113 , 25 A. L. … R. 625) ; Grafton v. City of Sellwood, 24 Or. 118 ( 32 P. 1026 ); City of Astoria v. American La France Fire Engine Co., 225 Fed. 21; and 3 McQuillin, Municipal Corporations (2d Ed.) sections 1266, 1281 and 1282.

Thorne v. Edwards

147 Or. 443 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 26, 1934

Law 67 ( 4 Atl. 658 ); Homewood People’s Bank v. Heckert, 207 Pa. 231 ( 56 Atl. 431 ); New London Credit Syndicate Limited v. Neale, 2 L. R. Q. B. 487; Heare v. Graham, 3 Camp. 57. … Our decisions have frequently given effect to such stipulated remedies: Kemmerer v. Title & Trust Co., 90 Or. 137 ( 175 P. 865 ); Mitchell v. Hughes, 80 Or. 574 ( 157 P. 965 ); T. B. Potter Realty Co. v.

Rutherford v. Edward L. Eyre & Co.

174 Or. 162 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 29, 1944

Reliance was had *Page 170 upon the analogous case of Lawrence v. Tucker , 23 How. (64 U.S.) 14, 16 L.Ed. 474 , and, referring to Pickersgill v. Brown , 7 La. … In Bondurant v.

State v. Suttles

287 Or. 15 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 3, 1979

Testimony on SB 65, Minutes of Senate Human Resources Comm., March 11, 1975, p. 4. *31 As noted in Baccelleri v. … As to the question of whether the letter’s relevancy or probative value was outweighed by its tendency to be *33 prejudicial, we have stated in State v.

State Ex Rel Hayden v. Hill

181 Or. 585 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 17, 1947

See also Holman, et al. v. Lutz, et al., 132 Or. 185 , 282 P. 241 , 284 P. 825 ; and State v. … It is Gibson v.

In Re Walther's Estate

177 Or. 382 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 9, 1945

Greenwood v. … Morley v. Silverton Hospital, supra.

Broughton v. Stricklin

146 Or. 259 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 13, 1934

We are referred to the testimony in another case, Peck v. … Such injunction shall only be issued in case it can be shown at the hearing that the water master has failed to carry into effect the order of the board of control or decrees of the court determining the existing rights to

Dearborn v. Real Estate Agency

334 Or. 493 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 6, 2002

No. 509-J v. FDAB, 311 Or 389 , 393 n 7, 812 P2d 1384 (1991) (unchallenged findings of fact in agency order are considered to be facts for purposes of judicial review). … It contends that the provision must be read in the context of ORS 670.280, which provides: *503 “Except as provided in ORS 342.143 or 342.175, no licensing board shall deny, suspend or revoke an occupational or professional

River v. Jordan Valley Land & Cattle Co.

143 Or. 249 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 2, 1933

Oliver v. Jordan Valley Land & Cattle Co., supra. … Salt Lake City v. Gardner, 39 Utah 30 ( 114 P. 147 ). We have carefully examined the record and decree in the case of Oliver v.

Bagley v. Mt. Bachelor, Inc.

356 Or. 543 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 18, 2014

Bliss v. … Bagley v.

Schroeder Et Ux. v. Toedtmeier

184 Or. 561 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 6, 1948

Belt et ux. v. Matson et al, 120 Or. 313 , 252 P. 80 ; Williams v. Barbee, 165 Or. 260 , 106 P. (2d) 1003 ; Murray v. Wiley, 169 Or. 381 , 127 P. (2d) 112 , 129 P. (2d) 66 . Both propositions correctly state the law. … Mallett v. Doherty, 180 Cal. 225 , 180 P. 531 , 15 A. L. R. 19; Fish v. Murrell, 219 Ky. 153 , 292 S. W. 1096 ; Robertson v. Little, 200 Ala. 582 , 76 S. 940; Cooksey v. Hartzell, 120 Ark. 313 , 179 S. W. 506 ; Halla v.

Agri-Link Corp. v. Schmitz

272 Or. 654 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 7, 1975

See also Pavlicek v. S.I.A.C., 235 Or 490 , 385 P2d 159 (1963). Dodd v. S.I.A.C., 211 Or 99, 102 , 310 P2d 324 , 311 P2d 458 , 315 P2d 138 (1957); Fed. Cartridge Corp. v. … Corkum v. Lenske, 239 Or 290 , 397 P2d 542 (1964); Ukase Inv. Co. v. Smith, 92 Or 337, 345 , 181 P 7 (1919). Cf. Louis Cooper Hats v.

J. C. Corbin Co. v. Preston

109 Or. 230 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 25, 1923

Co. v. Freud, 138 Cal. 651 ( 72 Pac. 345 ); 11 C. J. 739. Dose v. Bank of Woodburn, 58 Or. 529 ( 115 Pac. 286 ), and Lind v. … J., and Bean and Brown, JJ., concur.