Case law

Bowles, Adm'r. v. Mittleman

183 Or. 126 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 17, 1948

In Bowles v. Seigel, 7 F. R. … In Porter v. Maule, 160 F. (2d) 1; Bowles v. Ell-Carr, 71 Fed. Supp. 482; and Porter v. American Distilling Co., 71 Fed.

Ellis v. Hartmus

113 Or. 157 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 17, 1924

S.) 233); Henderson v. Shaffer, 110 La. 481 ( 34 South. 644 ); Lee v. Field, 9 N. M. 435 ( 54 Pac. 873 ); Riddle v. Russell, 117 Iowa, 533 ( 91 N. W. 810 ); Binford v. Adams, 104 Ind. 41 ( 3 N. E. 753 ). … J., and Bean and Brown, J J., concur.

Waldner v. Stephens

345 Or. 526 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 31, 2008

We have explained that conclusion in terms of a “general rule,” recognized in Brown v. … In Brewer v.

State v. Hutchings

375 Or. 132 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 9, 2026

Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc., 312 Or 376, 381-82, 823 P2d 956 (1991) (citing State v. Brown, 310 Or 347, 355-56, 800 P2d 259 (1990)). … State v.

Hatley v. Stafford

284 Or. 523 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 19, 1978

Brown of Young, Horn, Cass & Scott, Eugene, argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent. HOWELL, Justice. Plaintiff, lessee, filed this action for trespass against defendants, lessors. … DeVore v.

Kaseberg v. Davis Wright Tremaine, LLP

351 Or. 270 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 10, 2011

ORCP 47 C; Jones v. … Browne & Co. v. John P. 13 Sharkey Co., 58 Or 480, 482, 115 P 156 (1911).

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Crist

327 Or. 609 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 29, 1998

A trial panel of the Disciplinary Board entered an order finding the accused in default. Rule of Procedure (BR) 5.8(a). 4 Thereafter, the trial panel deemed the allegations in the formal complaint to be true. BR 5.8(a). … “On or about September 8, 1995, the Accused was selected as an arbitrator in the Multnomah County Circuit Court case entitled West Slope Services, Inc. v. Jacobs, Case No. 95C 842214.

Longview Fibre Co. v. Johnston

193 Or. 385 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 12, 1951

See Cody v. Black, 97 Or 343, 348 , 191 P 319 , 192 P 282 ; and Sommer v. Compton, 52 Or 173, 175 , 96 P 124, 1065 . … In Egan v.

McKee Electric Co. v. Carson Oil Co.

301 Or. 339 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 29, 1986

In State v. … Brown, 79 Wash 2d 586, 488 P2d 269, 279 (1971). See also Mobil Chemical Company v. Bell, 517 SW2d 245, 252-53 (Tex 1974), for a similar discussion and holding.

State v. Morey

25 Or. 241 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 9, 1894

And in People v. … v.

Morton v. Denham

39 Or. 227 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 1, 1901

Crow, 14 Or. 382, 395 ( 13 Pac. 55 ) ; Page v. Grant, 9 Or. 116 ; Fisher v. Lewis, 69 Mo. 629 ; Mullen v. Wilson, 44 Pa. St. 413 ( 84 Am. Dec. 461 ); Burdick v. Gill, 7 Fed. 668 ; City Nat. Bank v. Hamilton, 34 N. J. … As an attempted corroboration of the statement touching the accumulation of this large amount of money, what purports to be a lengthy statement of account, showing receipts for board and produce, seems to have been attached

Harrison v. Beals

111 Or. 563 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 5, 1924

In Hewitt v. … J., and Brown and Rand, JJ., concur.

Bartley v. Doherty

225 Or. 15 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 23, 1960

He was employed to perform general ranch and farm duties, including the use of heavy power-driven machinery, and at a monthly salary of $245, of which $45 was deducted for board and room. … Williams v. Clemens’ Forest Prod., Inc., supra; Barker v. Portland Traction Co., supra; and Wells v.

Stevens v. Myers

91 Or. 114 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 31, 1918

v. … Brown, 47 Mich. 384 . These are salutary but stringent rules, in the observance of which the interests of society and the public welfare are involved.

Cabell v. City of Portland

153 Or. 528 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 14, 1936

In defining the term “construction”, the court of appeals of New York in the case of In re Board of Public Works, 144 N. Y. 440 ( 39 N. … In Carlson v.

Porter v. Hill

314 Or. 86 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 6, 1992

In Isom v. … In Rowe v.

State Highway Commission v. Pacific Shore Land Co.

201 Or. 142 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 14, 1954

v. … In Latourette v.

State v. Merlo

92 Or. 678 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 18, 1919

At about 1:20 p. m. the defendant in company with her father boarded an Oregon electric car in Portland and reached Beaverton about 1:42 p. m. … At 4:07 p. m. the defendant boarded a car at Beaverton and arrived at Santa Rosa five or seven minutes afterwards. Joseph Merlo reached home about 1 p. m.

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Lawrence

350 Or. 480 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 30, 2011

Accused. 12 13 (OSB 08-115; SC S058778) 14 15 En Banc 16 17 On review of the decision of a trial panel of the Disciplinary Board … Co. v.

Central Lincoln People's Utility District v. State Tax Commission

221 Or. 398 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 27, 1960

Dist. et al. v. Wasco Co. et al., supra; Security Sav. & Trust Co. v. Lane County, 152 Or 108 , 53 P2d 33 ; Portland v. Multnomah County, 135 Or 469 , 296 P 48 ; Portland v. … Portland v. Welch et al., supra; State v. Preston, supra. See 84 CJS 388, Taxation § 202.