Case law

Ellis v. Hartmus

113 Or. 157 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 17, 1924

S.) 233); Henderson v. Shaffer, 110 La. 481 ( 34 South. 644 ); Lee v. Field, 9 N. M. 435 ( 54 Pac. 873 ); Riddle v. Russell, 117 Iowa, 533 ( 91 N. W. 810 ); Binford v. Adams, 104 Ind. 41 ( 3 N. E. 753 ). … J., and Bean and Brown, J J., concur.

Kaseberg v. Davis Wright Tremaine, LLP

351 Or. 270 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 10, 2011

ORCP 47 C; Jones v. … Browne & Co. v. John P. 13 Sharkey Co., 58 Or 480, 482, 115 P 156 (1911).

State v. Hutchings

375 Or. 132 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 9, 2026

Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc., 312 Or 376, 381-82, 823 P2d 956 (1991) (citing State v. Brown, 310 Or 347, 355-56, 800 P2d 259 (1990)). … State v.

State v. Medina

357 Or. 254 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 14, 2015

State v. … See Lilly v.

State v. Shaw

338 Or. 586 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 16, 2005

State v. … State v.

Bartley v. Doherty

225 Or. 15 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 23, 1960

He was employed to perform general ranch and farm duties, including the use of heavy power-driven machinery, and at a monthly salary of $245, of which $45 was deducted for board and room. … Williams v. Clemens’ Forest Prod., Inc., supra; Barker v. Portland Traction Co., supra; and Wells v.

Patterson v. Skoglund

181 Or. 167 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 1, 1947

Roberts v. Cohen, supra. … Disch v. Closset, 118 Or. 111 , 244 P. 71 ; McKinnon v. Chenoweth, 176 Or. 74 , 155 P. (2d) 944 ; Berkshire v. Harem, supra.

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Crist

327 Or. 609 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 29, 1998

A trial panel of the Disciplinary Board entered an order finding the accused in default. Rule of Procedure (BR) 5.8(a). 4 Thereafter, the trial panel deemed the allegations in the formal complaint to be true. BR 5.8(a). … “On or about September 8, 1995, the Accused was selected as an arbitrator in the Multnomah County Circuit Court case entitled West Slope Services, Inc. v. Jacobs, Case No. 95C 842214.

Bowles, Adm'r. v. Mittleman

183 Or. 126 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 17, 1948

In Bowles v. Seigel, 7 F. R. … In Porter v. Maule, 160 F. (2d) 1; Bowles v. Ell-Carr, 71 Fed. Supp. 482; and Porter v. American Distilling Co., 71 Fed.

Wheatley v. Carl Halvorson, Inc.

213 Or. 228 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 19, 1958

Smith, 119 Cal App2d 685, 260 P2d 179 ; Southard et al v. Oil Equipment Corporation, Okl (1956), 296 P2d 780 ; Brown & Bigelow v. Roy, Ohio App (1955), 132 NE2d 755 ; Salem v. … In Thomas v.

State v. Moore

361 Or. 205 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 9, 2017

Brown, 262 Or 442, 497 P2d 1191 (1972) (holding that Article I, section 12, requires consolidation of all charges known to prosecutor). … In Arizona v.

State v. Pacific Live Stock Co.

93 Or. 196 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 22, 1919

Rep. 576 ); People v. Corner, 59 Hun, 299 ( 12 N. Y. Supp. 936 ) (affirmed in 128 N. Y. 640 , 29 N. E. 147 ); State v. Corbin & Stone, 16 S. C. 533, 543; Borden v. Houston, 2 Tex. 594 ; Bates v. … Rep. 382 ); Industrial School v. Reynolds, 143 Ala. 579, 585 ( 42 South. 114 ); State v. Baltimore & Ohio R. R. Co., 34 Md. 344, 374 ; Chevallier’s Admr. v. State, 10 Tex. 315 . See, also, State Land Board v.

Mathis v. Thunderbird Village, Inc.

236 Or. 425 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 13, 1964

In Paget v. … Wks, supra ( 191 Or at 251 ), held: ‘“Board and expenses, when considered as used in the construction of a building, are nonlienable, but when they are a part of the reasonable compensation paid for the labor and materials

Longview Fibre Co. v. Johnston

193 Or. 385 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 12, 1951

See Cody v. Black, 97 Or 343, 348 , 191 P 319 , 192 P 282 ; and Sommer v. Compton, 52 Or 173, 175 , 96 P 124, 1065 . … In Egan v.

Morton v. Denham

39 Or. 227 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 1, 1901

Crow, 14 Or. 382, 395 ( 13 Pac. 55 ) ; Page v. Grant, 9 Or. 116 ; Fisher v. Lewis, 69 Mo. 629 ; Mullen v. Wilson, 44 Pa. St. 413 ( 84 Am. Dec. 461 ); Burdick v. Gill, 7 Fed. 668 ; City Nat. Bank v. Hamilton, 34 N. J. … As an attempted corroboration of the statement touching the accumulation of this large amount of money, what purports to be a lengthy statement of account, showing receipts for board and produce, seems to have been attached

State v. Partain

349 Or. 10 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 10, 2010

In 1967, in State v. … See Nulph, 333 F3d at 1059-60 (insufficient evidence in the record that petitioner elected to apply an unfavorable rule at parole board hearing; therefore state did not rebut presumption of vindictiveness); Bono v.

Barde v. Portland News Publishing Co.

145 Or. 376 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 13, 1933

Mayhew v. … Wood v. Partridge, 11 Mass. 488 , Brewer v. Dyer, 7 Cush. 337 . Bridgham v. Tileston, 5 Allen 371 .

McKee Electric Co. v. Carson Oil Co.

301 Or. 339 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 29, 1986

In State v. … Brown, 79 Wash 2d 586, 488 P2d 269, 279 (1971). See also Mobil Chemical Company v. Bell, 517 SW2d 245, 252-53 (Tex 1974), for a similar discussion and holding.

Porter v. Hill

314 Or. 86 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 6, 1992

In Isom v. … In Rowe v.

Harrison v. Beals

111 Or. 563 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 5, 1924

In Hewitt v. … J., and Brown and Rand, JJ., concur.