Case law

State v. Sing

114 Or. 267 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1924

BROWN, J. — The defendant herein was a stranger in the vicinity of Astoria, having arrived there from Seattle, Washington, only a short time before the homicide. … Co. v.

State v. Dixson

307 Or. 195 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 20, 1988

In Hester v. … See, e.g., Brown v. State, 48 Ala App 84, 261 So2d 914 (1971), aff'd 288 Ala 732, 261 So2d 919 (1972) (“possessions” does not include open fields); Brent v.

State v. Magers

36 Or. 38 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 13, 1899

In Chute v. … So, in Duncan v.

Western Feed Co. v. Heidloff

230 Or. 324 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 28, 1962

In Parrish v. … Brown, 102 Or 389 , 202 P 719 (1921), where it was stated that it “is not within the discretion of the court to admit evidence about experiments, unless the conditions are substantially alike.”

D. E. Shaw Renewable Investments v. Dept. of Rev.

371 Or. 384 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 5, 2023

ORS 306.115 traces back to 1929, when the legislature granted the state tax commission (the department’s predecessor) the authority to “direct and to order any county board of equalization [later a county board of property … See State v.

Kirby v. Southern Pacific Co.

108 Or. 290 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 10, 1923

In Olds v. … J., and Brown and McCottrt, JJ., concur.

Lake County Pine Lumber Co. v. Underwood Lumber Co.

140 Or. 19 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 24, 1932

Any cull lumber shall be tallied on the basis of box lumber contained in such boards. TEEMS. … Under the circumstances, the admission of respondent’s exhibit “Gr” was without error: Ladd v. Sears, 9 Or. 244 ; Hildebrand v. United Artisans, 50 Or. 159 ( 91 P. 542 ); State v.

State v. Shaw

338 Or. 586 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 16, 2005

State v. … State v.

State Ex Rel. Overhulse v. Appling

226 Or. 575 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 7, 1961

City of Portland v. Goodwin, 187 Or 409, 416 , 210 P2d 577 (1949); Fox v. Galloway, 174 Or 339, 347 , 148 P2d 922 (1944); Wright v. Beveridge, 120 Or 244, 248 , 251 P 895 (1927); State v. … State v. Brown, 10 Or 215, 219-228 (1882). However, he is vested with the power to decide initially whether the claim presented was in fact incurred and whether it is a type authorized by law. Boyd v.

Marshall's Towing v. Department of State Police

339 Or. 54 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 21, 2005

Marshall’s Towing v. Department of State Police, 194 Or App 726 , 99 P3d 1237 (2004). … Board of Dental Examiners, 288 Or 293 , 605 P2d 273 (1980), and Don’t Waste Oregon Com. v. Energy Facility Siting, 320 Or 132 , 881 P2d 119 (1994).

Wheeler v. International Woodwkrs. of Am., No. 3-12

274 Or. 373 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 11, 1976

In 1971, however, in Motor Coach Employees v. … In Beriault v.

State v. Tate

347 Or. 318 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 19, 2009

The court relied on its previous decision in Haynes v. … See Hernandez v.

Wheatley v. Carl Halvorson, Inc.

213 Or. 228 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 19, 1958

Smith, 119 Cal App2d 685, 260 P2d 179 ; Southard et al v. Oil Equipment Corporation, Okl (1956), 296 P2d 780 ; Brown & Bigelow v. Roy, Ohio App (1955), 132 NE2d 755 ; Salem v. … In Thomas v.

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Dinerman

314 Or. 308 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 24, 1992

See In re Hockett, 303 Or 150, 157-58 , 734 P2d 877 (1987) (defining fraud in the disciplinary rule as fraud that would be actionable in Oregon in a tortious sense); Rice v. … Reserve bank, member bank, national bank or insured bank, or a receiver of a national bank, or any agent or employee of the receiver, or a Federal Reserve Agent, or an agent or employee of a Federal Reserve Agent or of the Board

State v. Moore

361 Or. 205 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 9, 2017

Brown, 262 Or 442, 497 P2d 1191 (1972) (holding that Article I, section 12, requires consolidation of all charges known to prosecutor). … In Arizona v.

Neuberger v. City of Portland

288 Or. 155 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 4, 1979

The reasoning in Baker v. … Language in Frankland v.

Eaton v. Keisling

311 Or. 415 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 6, 1991

ORS 250.085(4); Reed v. Roberts, 304 Or 649, 652 , 748 P2d 542 (1988). We turn to a consideration of petitioner’s arguments concerning the Caption, Question, and Summary. … the most selective methods while causing the least interference with recreational angling and the spawning and rearing of natural fish runs. “(3) All individuals who represent this state on any interstate or international board

State v. Hubbard

297 Or. 789 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 18, 1984

“A Yes. 1 “Q And an officer who did something like that would have to do what — stand a board trial or — by the department? “[PROSECUTOR]: Your Honor, I’d have to object to this. … .” *797 In Rich v.

Juarez v. Windsor Rock Products, Inc.

341 Or. 160 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 14, 2006

See, e.g., James v. … Coast Range Conifers v. Board of Forestry, 339 Or 136, 143 , 117 P3d 990 (2005) (quoting Noah Webster, An American Dictionary of the English Language (1828)).

Miller v. Southern Pacific Co.

20 Or. 285 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 6, 1891

In Brown v. … In Rex v.