Case law

Smith v. Psychiatric Sec. Review Bd.

364 Or. 535 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 7, 2019

Wtw Development, LLC v. Board of County Com'rs of Josephine County

342 Or. 254 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 27, 2006

149 P.3d 1213 (2006) 342 Or. 254 WTW Development, LLC v. Board of County Com'rs of Josephine County No. S54257. Supreme Court of Oregon. December 27, 2006. Petitions for review Denied.

Browning v. C & C PLYWOOD CORP.

248 Or. 574 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 29, 1967

The plan was consummated at a special meeting of the Board of Directors held on February 11, 1963, immediately following the expiration of the pre-emptive right period; the design to eliminate Browning was completed. … The relief to which Browning is entitled presents a difficult problem.

Oregon & Washington Mortgage Savings Bank v. Jordan

16 Or. 113 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 29, 1888

City of Davenport, 17 Iowa, 379 ; Merrill v. Gorham, 6 Cal. 41 ; Porter v. R. 1. & St. L. R. R. Co. 76 Ill. 561 ; 2 Desty on Taxation, 661; Waterbury Savings Bank v. Lawler, 46 Conn. 243 ; Seeley v. … In reaching the conclusion indicated, we have not overlooked Dalton v. East Portland, 11 Or. 426 ; Stingle v. Nevel, 9 Or. 62 ; or Brown v. School District No. 1, 12 Or. 345 .

Eugene Water & Elec. Bd. v. Pub. Emps. Ret. Bd. & John T. Wigle

365 Or. 59 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 6, 2019

See Brown v. SAIF , 361 Or. 241 , 254, 391 P.3d 773 (2017) (turning to "the relevant statutes in context to determine the interpretation that best fits the statutory scheme as a whole " (emphasis in original)). … Engweiler v.

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Hendricks

282 Or. 763 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 27, 1978

There is other evidence to support the Trial Board’s findings. We concur in the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of the Trial Board. … In re Brown, 277 Or 121, 134 , 559 P2d 884 (1977). The accused should have disclosed his proposed dealings with the Grahams to the other members of the law firm by whom he was employed.

Rogue Advocates v. Board of Comm. of Jackson County

Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 14, 2017

Rogue Advocates v. Board of Comm. of Jackson County, 277 Or App 651, 372 P3d 587 (2016). … Boise Cascade Corp. v. Board of Forestry (S42159), 325 Or 185, 192, 935 P2d 411 (1997).

Eagle Point Irrigation District v. Cowden

137 Or. 121 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 10, 1931

The fund itself is state property and, as stated in State Land Board v. … J., Brown and Campbell, JJ., concur.

Forney v. Western States Plywood

297 Or. 628 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 28, 1984

The Workers’ Compensation Board affirmed the referee. … Brown v. EBI Companies, 289 Or 905 , 618 P2d 959 (1980).

Jones v. Polk County

36 Or. 539 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 5, 1900

In State v. … In Brown v.

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Harris

334 Or. 353 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 11, 2002

Stevenson v. Holzman, 254 Or 94, 104 , 458 P2d 414 (1969). Further, in Brown v. Multnomah County Dist. … . *364 Citing Lassiter v.

School District No. 1 v. State Board of Education

250 Or. 133 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 17, 1968

Midland County, Texas, 390 US 474 , 88 S Ct 1114 , 20 L ed2d 45 (1968); Dusch et al v. Davis et al, 387 US 112 , 87 S Ct 1554 , 18 L ed2d 656 (1967); Reynolds v. … Sims, 377 US 533 , 84 S Ct 1362 , 12 L ed2d 506 (1964); and Gray v. Sanders, 372 US 368 , 83 S Ct 801 , 9 L ed2d 821 (1963). We doubt the relevance of such a contention.

State Ex Rel. Luckey v. James

189 Or. 268 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 20, 1950

See Nottage v. City of Portland, 35 Or. 539 , 58 P. 883 ; Ayers et al v. Lund, 49 Or. 303 , 89 P. 806 ; Brown v. Silverton, 97 Or. 441 , 190 P. 971 ; 25 A. L. … In the case of Brown v. Silverton, supra, Mr.

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Griffith

304 Or. 575 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 30, 1987

State ex rel. v. Arnold, 145 Or 634, 639 , 28 P.2d 846 . … Corp. v.

State Ex Rel. Swalko v. Elliott

113 Or. 632 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 28, 1925

BROWN, J. … The defendants’ motion for judgment of non-suit, for the purposes of the motion, conceded the truthfulness of the testimony received into the record for plaintiff: Brown v. Sheedy, 90 Or. 74 ( 175 Pac. 613 ).

Kopacin v. Crown-Columbia Pulp & Paper Co.

62 Or. 291 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 30, 1912

Galvin v. Brown & McCabe, 53 Or. 598, 608 ( 101 Pac. 671 ) ; Geldard v. Marshall, 43 Or. 438 ( 73 Pac. 330 ). 4. … Clarke v. Holmes, 7 Hurl. & N. Rep. 937. 5.

State v. Sutton

253 Or. 24 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 19, 1969

Hall v. Brown, 102 Or 389, 393 , 202 P 719 (1921); Manchester Assur. Co. v. Ore. R. R. Co., 46 Or 162, 166-167 , 79 P 60 , 69 LRA 475 (1905); Friendly v. Lee, 20 Or 202, 205 , 25 P 396 (1890). … Mason, Ehrman & Co. v. Lewis Est., 131 Or 242, 258 , 276 P 281 , 281 P 123 , 282 P 772 (1929); Fitzpatrick v. Sletten, 117 Or 173, 176, 242 P 1114 (1926); Hall v. Brown, supra; Manchester Assur. Co. v. Ore. R. R.

Oregon Shores Conservation Coalition v. Board of County Com'rs of Clatsop County

351 Or. 541 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 12, 2012

273 P.3d 135 (2012) 351 Or. 541 OREGON SHORES CONSERVATION COALITION v. BOARD OF COUNTY COM'RS OF CLATSOP COUNTY. No. (S059579). Supreme Court of Oregon. January 12, 2012. Petition for Review Allowed. … The decision of the Court of Appeals is vacated, and this case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of Friends of Yamhill v. Board of Commissioners, 351 Or. 219 , 264 P.3d 1265 (2011).

Palmer v. Willamette Val. S. Ry. Co.

88 Or. 322 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 9, 1918

"While waiting at the depot a standing train serves as an invitation to all intending passengers to board it, and the invitation carries with it an assurance that the passenger may board the train in safety: Jones v. … Rep. 462 ); Carr v. Eel River & E. R. Co., 98 Cal. 366 ( 33 Pac. 213 , 21 L. R. A. 354); Browne v. Raleigh & G. R. Co., 108 N. C. 34 ( 12 S. E. 958 ); Gannon v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry., Co., 141 Iowa, 37 ( 117 N.

Union High School District No. 1 v. Linn County District Boundary Board

244 Or. 207 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 14, 1966

Oregon Constitution, Article VIII, § 3; Padberg, West et al v. Martin et al, 225 Or 135 , 357 P2d 255 (1960); School District No. 68 v. Hoskins et al, 194 Or 301 , 240 P2d 949 (1952); Campbell v. … “(d) Is not likely to adversely affect any contemplated reorganization under ORS 330.505 to 330.780.” *217 We held in School Dist. 7 v.