Case law

West Hills, Inc. v. State Tax Commission

255 Or. 172 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 18, 1970

As held in State by and through Road Commission v. … Continental Development Corp. v. State, Tex Civ App 337 SW2d 371 (1968): Sanitary District of Chicago v. Baumbach, 270 Ill 128, 110 NE 331 (1915). See also 118 ALR, 869 , 884; 85 ALR2d 110.

Hendrix v. McKee

281 Or. 123 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 31, 1978

Co. v. … Co. v.

United Artisans Life Ass'n v. Odd Fellows Home

129 Or. 66 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 30, 1929

Citing Grand Lodge v. Connolly, 58 N. J. Eq. 180 ( 43 Atl. 286 ); Grand Lodge v. Gandy, 63 N. J. Eq. 292 ( 53 Atl. 142 ); Grand Lodge v. Edwards, 111 Me. 359 ( 89 Atl. 147 ). … McBride, Brown and Belt, JJ., concur.

Enloe v. Lawson

146 Or. 621 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 3, 1934

Citing State v. McManus, 65 Kan. 720 ( 70 P. 700 ); Stahl v. Lee, 71 Kan. 511 ( 80 P. 983 ). At page 891 of 8 A. L. R., we find, in Landers v. Com., 126 Va. 780 ( 101 S. … Kizer, supra; Durant v. Bennett, supra; Garland Novelty Co., v. State, 71 Ark. 138 ( 71 S. W. 257 ); Kite v. People, 32 Colo. 5 ( 74 P. 886 ).

Wittemyer v. City of Portland

361 Or. 854 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 21, 2017

.”); Baker v. … In Short v.

Egr v. Egr

170 Or. 1 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 17, 1942

Gilmore v. Burch, 7 Or. 374 , 33 Am. Rep. 710 . *9 A recent instance of the application of that principle is found in In re Brown’s Estate, 165 Or. 575 , 108 P. (2d) 775 . See also 24 Am. … It *33 is the exercise, in circumstances such as the one before us, of undue influence which is prohibited, and, as was pointed out in Brown v. Hilleary, 133 Or. 26 , 285 P. 953 , undue influence is wrongful influence.

State v. Rogers

330 Or. 282 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 4, 2000

Similarly, in Brown et ux v. Eakins, 220 Or 122 , 348 P2d 1116 (1960), the court examined the training and experience of the witness in light of the testimony sought. … In Wulff v.

Staples v. Butler

125 Or. 102 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 20, 1928

Butler and Reed is set out in *109 haec verba in the cross-complaint and we think it is entirely proper for the Court of Chancery, having the parties, pleadings and testimony all before it, to settle the controversy: Bliss v. … J., and Brown and Belt, JJ., concur.

Arden Farms Co. v. State Department of Agriculture

245 Or. 214 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 23, 1967

See Milk Board v. Eisenberg Co., 306 US 346 , 59 S Ct 528 , 83 L Ed 752 (1939). … Nebbia v. New York, 291 US 502 , 54 S Ct 505 , 78 L Ed 940 , 89 ALR 1469 (1934); Baldwin v. Seelig, supra. See also Savage v. Martin, 161 Or 660 , 91 P2d 273 (1939).

Phez Co. v. Salem Fruit Union

103 Or. 514 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 19, 1921

Elgin, 11 Or. 333 ( 8 Pac. 280 ); Strong v. Kamm, 13 Or. 172 ( 9 Pac. 331 ); Parker v. Jeffery, 26 Or. 186 ( 37 Pac. 712 ); Washburn v. Interstate Investment Co., 26 Or. 436 ( 36 Pac. 533 , 38 Pac. 620 ); Feldman v. … Indeed, in the case of Washburn v.

Hise v. City of North Bend

138 Or. 150 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 8, 1931

Co. v. Ochoco Irr. Dist., 108 Or. 1 ( 210 P. 873 , 216 P. 189 ); Ryder v. La Grande, 73 Or. 227 ( 144 P. 471 ); Blake-McFall v. Portland, 68 Or. 126 ( 135 P. 873 ); Pacific Paper Co. v. … Co. v.

State v. Roberts

374 Or. 821 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 5, 2026

Rogue Advocates v. Board of Comm. of Jackson County, 362 Or 269, 272, 407 P3d 795 (2017). … Couey v.

State Ex Rel. Huddleston v. Sawyer

324 Or. 597 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 21, 1997

In Carlson v. … L. v.

State v. Hamann

363 Or. 264 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 5, 2018

In Lewis v. … Brown v. Multnomah County Dist.

Robbins v. Irwin

180 Or. 667 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 5, 1947

Schmidt v. Multnomah Operating Co., supra; Straub v. Oregon Electric Ry. Co., supra; Marks v. Bauers, supra; High Splint Coal Co. v. Baker, 247 Ky. 426 , 57 S. W. (2d) 60 . … In Hoag v.

Knapp v. City of Jacksonville

342 Or. 268 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 19, 2007

This court’s decision in Roseburg School Dist. v. … See Ailes v.

Wagner v. Columbia Hospital District

259 Or. 15 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 19, 1971

See Humphrey v. Moore, 375 US 335 , 11 L ed 2d 370, 84 S Ct 363 ; Labor Board v. *22 Miranda Fuel Co., 326 F2d 172. … Brewer v.

Martelli v. RA Chambers and Associates

310 Or. 529 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 8, 1990

Accord: Reynolds et al v. … Brazeale v. State Ind. Acc.

Kamin v. KUHNAU

232 Or. 139 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 19, 1962

See, Seismograph Service Corp. v. Offshore Raydist, supra; Tabor v. Hoffman, supra. ⑪ McKinzie v. Cline, supra. Accord, Extrin Foods v. Leighton, 115 NYS2d 429, 435 (Sup Ct 1952). See also, Schonwald v. … See also, Englehart, Confusion Unlimited, 34 Geo L J 302 (1946). ⑫ Brown v. Fowler, 316 SW2d 111 (Tex Civ App 1958). ⑬ Telechron, Inc. v. Parissi, 197 F2d 757 (2d Cir 1952); Schreyer v.

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Schenck

318 Or. 402 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 10, 1994

Myers, supra, 461 US at 150-52 (same); Pickering v. Board of Education, supra, 391 US at 568 (same). … The range of constitutional challenges based on “vagueness” is discussed in Megdal v. Board of Dental Examiners, 288 Or 293, 296-303 , 605 P2d 273 (1980).