Case law

Hutchinson v. Bidwell

24 Or. 219 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 29, 1893

On the twenty-seventh of August, 1888, a meeting of the stockholders was called, after notice thereof, to determino what action the company should take under the circumstances; and at such meeting the board of directors stated … “Agency,” said Brewer, J., “implies trust, and no man may violate a trust”: National Bank v. Drake, 29 Kan. 313 . The doctrine rests upon the simple principal of common honesty.

Ryckman v. Manerud

68 Or. 350 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 9, 1913

A. 525 ); Moore v. Omaha Life Assn., 62 Neb. 497 ( 87 N. W. 321, 322 ); Leavengood v. McGee, 50 Or. 233, 237 ( 91 Pac. 453 ); Daivson v. Coffey, 12 Or. 513 ( 8 Pac. 838 ); Dawson v. … In Dawson v.

Staveland and Fisher

366 Or. 49 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 27, 2019

As to the Dickinson house, the trial court began by noting that the relevant legal analysis was set out in Beal v. … See State v.

Sproul v. State Tax Commission

234 Or. 567 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 29, 1963

Similarly, in Kornhauser v. … This test was applied in Jerry Rossman Corporation v. Commissioner of Int. Rev., 175 F2d 711 (2d Cir (1949)). In Lilly v.

Steeby v. Norcott

143 Or. 501 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 29, 1933

J. 57, § 475; Shea v. Graves, 142 Or. 503 ( 19 P. (2d) 406 ); Shafford v. … L. 135, § 142; Multorpor Co. v. Reed, 122 Or. 605 ( 260 P. 203 , 55 A. L. R. 504).

Johnson v. Ladd

144 Or. 268 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 28, 1933

Justice BROWN reaffirmed what had been said numerous times prior thereto, that "it is well settled that the right to correct a judgment under this constituional provision is based upon error of law committed by the trial … Justice BROWN, answering the contention that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict, said: "Were we to determine this cause from the whole of the evidence, our verdict might be in contrariety to that returned

Peeples v. Lampert

345 Or. 209 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 14, 2008

See, e.g., State v. Brown, 310 Or 347, 355-56 , 800 P2d 259 (1990) (describing plain error). … Davis v.

May v. Chicago Insurance Company

260 Or. 285 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 5, 1971

Falk v. Sul America Terrestres, 255 Or 246, 248 , 465 P2d 714 (1970); Oregon Farm Bureau v. … “Olson Towboat agrees that Captain May was its employee as far as Bandon, but claims his employment ceased when he boarded the GO-GETTER. I disagree.

Dixon / Frohnmayer v. Rosenblum

355 Or. 364 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 8, 2014

“[T]here has to be some play in the joints of the ballot title writing process,” the court explained, “if this court is to maintain its status as a law-enforcing court, rather than an editorial board.” Id. … Kain v. Myers, 336 Or 116, 121, 79 P3d 864 (2003). As this court explained in Towers v.

Huebener v. Chinn

186 Or. 508 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 4, 1949

Reilly v. … From United States Shipping Board Merchant Fleet Corporation v.

Fisher v. Lane

174 Or. 438 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 11, 1944

v. … We have examined the cases of Bradfeldt v. Cooke , 27 Or. 194 , 40 P. 1 , 50 Am.St.Rep. 701 ; Ah Doon v. Smith , 25 Or. 89 , 34 P. 1093 ; Moreland v. Devenney , 72 Kan. 471 , 83 P. 1097 ; Peters v.

Kane v. Kulongoski

318 Or. 593 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 14, 1994

feasible alternatives, including, but not limited to, comfort care, hospice care and pain control. (8) "Medically confirmed" means the medical opinion of the attending physician has been confirmed by a consulting physician v, … examined the patient and the patient's relevant medical records. (9) "Patient" means a person who is under the care of a physician. (10) "Physician" means a doctor of medicine or osteopathy licensed to practice medicine by the Board

Beglau v. Albertus

272 Or. 170 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 12, 1975

Hale, supra, note 2 ; State v. Bosch, 139 Or 150, 153-54 , 7 P2d 554 (1932). Oregon Laws 1930, ch 233, § 2. See Lyons v. Browning et al, 170 Or 350 , 133 P2d 599 (1943); and Neal v. Haight, supra, note 2 . … See also Clark v. Fazio et al, supra, note 2 at 527-28. To the same effect, see: Stein v. Handy, supra, note 7 at 235; Hays v. Herman, supra, note 2 ; Hillman v. North Wasco Co. PUD, supra, note 2 ; Lee v.

Baker v. Rose City Transit Co.

227 Or. 110 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 26, 1961

We think that this case is ruled by Morrison v. Pacific Nw. Pub. Ser. Co. (1934) 146 Or 225 , 30 P2d 344 . … Byrne v. Connecticut Co., 123 Conn 304, 195 A 184; Yedinak v. City of New York, 91 NYS 2d 195 affirmed without opinion 90 NYS2d 678 . Plaintiff cites two cases in which the foreign substance was ice and snow.

Weyerhaeuser Timber Co. v. Galloway

168 Or. 85 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 4, 1941

On page 878 the same treatise says: “One of the common types of a private challenge of administrative action is the denial of the jurisdiction of the Board or agency to deal with the subject or *108 impair or affect the petitioner … See also Williams v. Tawes, 179 Md. 224 , 17 Atl. (2d) 137, 132 A. L. R. 1105; more especially the annotation.

May v. Roberts

133 Or. 643 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 18, 1929

In Reed v. … Belt and Brown, JJ., absent. Rossman, J., dissents.

Lynd v. ROCKWELL MANUFACTURING COMPANY

276 Or. 341 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 30, 1976

Bird, Brown, Hughes, Bird & Lane, Grants Pass, argued the cause and filed a brief for appellant. William V. Deatherage, Medford, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Thomas D. … In Brownell v.

Matter of Marriage of Richardson

307 Or. 370 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 14, 1989

Kruger, 139 NJ Super 413, 354 A2d 340 (1976) mod 73 NJ 463, 375 A2d 659 (1977); Webster v. … Turner v. Turner, 237 Or 39, 40-41 , 390 P2d 360 (1964) (per curiam).

Egr v. Egr

170 Or. 1 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 17, 1942

Gilmore v. Burch, 7 Or. 374 , 33 Am. Rep. 710 . *9 A recent instance of the application of that principle is found in In re Brown’s Estate, 165 Or. 575 , 108 P. (2d) 775 . See also 24 Am. … It *33 is the exercise, in circumstances such as the one before us, of undue influence which is prohibited, and, as was pointed out in Brown v. Hilleary, 133 Or. 26 , 285 P. 953 , undue influence is wrongful influence.

State Ex Rel Juv. Dept. v. MT

321 Or. 419 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 10, 1995

Dept. v. M.T., 128 Or.App. 25, 31 , 874 P.2d 836 (1994). … Smith v. Multnomah County Board of Commissioners, 318 Or. 302, 309 , 865 P.2d 356 (1994); Colby v. Larson, 208 Or. 121, 126-27 , 297 P.2d 1073 (1956).