Case law

Johnson v. Berns

111 Or. 165 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 1, 1924

In Graham v. … In Whitbread & Co., Ltd., v. Watt, L. R. 1 Ch.

Foster v. Foster

107 Or. 355 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 1, 1923

Robbins, 8 Or. 278 ; Huston v. Bybee, 17 Or. 140 (2 L. R. A. 568, 20 Pac. 51 ); Combs v. Slayton, 19 Or. 99 ( 26 Pac. 661 ); Curtis v. La Grande Water Co., 20 Or. 34 (10 L. R. … J., and Brown and McCourt, JJ., concur.

State v. Hansen

304 Or. 169 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 29, 1987

See State v. … (dictum); Davis v.

American National Bank v. Gordon

140 Or. 431 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 14, 1932

From Perry v. Leveroni, 252 Mass. 390 ( 147 N. … J., Brown and Belt, JJ., concur.

Kane v. Kulongoski

318 Or. 593 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 14, 1994

feasible alternatives, including, but not limited to, comfort care, hospice care and pain control. (8) "Medically confirmed" means the medical opinion of the attending physician has been confirmed by a consulting physician v, … examined the patient and the patient's relevant medical records. (9) "Patient" means a person who is under the care of a physician. (10) "Physician" means a doctor of medicine or osteopathy licensed to practice medicine by the Board

Patterson v. Chambers Power Co.

81 Or. 328 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 1, 1916

It is only where the language is equivocal or doubtful that the situation of the parties or the surrounding circumstances may be shown: Strong v. Benedict, 5 Conn. 210 ; Brown v. Slater, 16 Conn. 195 ( 41 Am. … Co. v.

Weyerhaeuser Timber Co. v. Galloway

168 Or. 85 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 4, 1941

On page 878 the same treatise says: “One of the common types of a private challenge of administrative action is the denial of the jurisdiction of the Board or agency to deal with the subject or *108 impair or affect the petitioner … See also Williams v. Tawes, 179 Md. 224 , 17 Atl. (2d) 137, 132 A. L. R. 1105; more especially the annotation.

Senkirik v. ROYCE

192 Or. 583 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 26, 1951

Walker v. Penner, 190 Or. 542 , 227 P. 2d 316 ; Johnson v. Updegrave, 186 Or. 196 , 206 P. 2d 91 ; Peters v. Johnson et al., 124 Or. 237 , 264 P. 459 . … Sherrard v. Werline, 162 Or. 135 , 91 P. 2d 344 ; Cerrano v. Portland Ry. L. & P. Co., 62 Or. 421, 427 , 126 P. 37 .

State v. Boots

308 Or. 371 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 26, 1989

(C) A member of the Oregon State Police; “(D) A judicial officer as defined in ORS 1.210; “(E) A juror or witness in a criminal proceeding; “(F) An employe or officer of a court of justice; or “(G) A member of the State Board … State v.

Steeby v. Norcott

143 Or. 501 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 29, 1933

J. 57, § 475; Shea v. Graves, 142 Or. 503 ( 19 P. (2d) 406 ); Shafford v. … L. 135, § 142; Multorpor Co. v. Reed, 122 Or. 605 ( 260 P. 203 , 55 A. L. R. 504).

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Boothe

303 Or. 643 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 4, 1987

In In re Brown, 298 Or 285, 297 , 692 P2d 107 (1984), this court held that a lawyer who induced his client to sign a false affidavit for the purpose of persuading the Bar to discontinue an investigation did not violate former … Toledo Bar Association v.

Cabell v. Fed. Land Bank of Spokane

173 Or. 11 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 26, 1943

.; Anderson v. Baxter, 4 Or. 105 ; Myer v. Beal, 5 Or. 130 . … J., Waters, section 1089; Trustees of Columbia College v. Lynch, 70 N. Y. 440 , 26 Am. Rep. 615 ; Whitney v. Union Railway Co., 11 Gray (77 Mass.) 359, 71 Am. Dec. 715 ; Parker v.

Hopfer v. Staudt

207 Or. 487 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 31, 1956

Staudt, dba Brown-Line Freight Company and against Joseph A. Hopfer, * * *.” It must be said that the ordinary and proper procedure is to set aside the former judgment in express terms if one has been entered. … Co. v.

Hutchinson v. Bidwell

24 Or. 219 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 29, 1893

On the twenty-seventh of August, 1888, a meeting of the stockholders was called, after notice thereof, to determino what action the company should take under the circumstances; and at such meeting the board of directors stated … “Agency,” said Brewer, J., “implies trust, and no man may violate a trust”: National Bank v. Drake, 29 Kan. 313 . The doctrine rests upon the simple principal of common honesty.

Ryckman v. Manerud

68 Or. 350 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 9, 1913

A. 525 ); Moore v. Omaha Life Assn., 62 Neb. 497 ( 87 N. W. 321, 322 ); Leavengood v. McGee, 50 Or. 233, 237 ( 91 Pac. 453 ); Daivson v. Coffey, 12 Or. 513 ( 8 Pac. 838 ); Dawson v. … In Dawson v.

Staveland and Fisher

366 Or. 49 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 27, 2019

As to the Dickinson house, the trial court began by noting that the relevant legal analysis was set out in Beal v. … See State v.

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Hostetter

348 Or. 574 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 29, 2010

See, e.g., FDIC v. … Accordingly, it appears that the trial panel’s lack of a finding regarding DR Í-102(A)(3) was merely inadvertent. 6 See also Mickens v.

Setser v. Commonwealth, Inc.

256 Or. 11 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 10, 1970

Plaintiff, however, computed the amount of his commission as though the transaction were a sale of real estate, using realty board rates. After showing the property to three other prospective purchasers, Mrs. … Justice Lusk observed in Wagner v. Rainier Mfg. Co., 230 Or 531 , 371 P2d 74 (1962): “The cases are legion and * * * no case has a brother.” ( 230 Or at 542 .)

State v. Multnomah County

13 Or. 287 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 22, 1886

The county judge, clerk, and assessor, as a board of equaliza *292 tion (Code, p. 756, sec. 37), met on the last Monday in August (Code, p. 752, sec. 19), and examined and corrected the assessment roll. … In Danforth v.

Blue Mountain Alliance v. Energy Facility Siting Council

353 Or. 465 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 18, 2013

of Commissioners (board). … V.