Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersor

8,515 results

2.76s

  • State v. Harris

    106 Or. 211 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 9, 1923

    In the case of State v. … State v. Weiss, 63 Or. 462, 466 ( 128 Pac. 448 ); State v.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • State v. Hosmer

    72 Or. 57 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 16, 1914

    O’Neil, 13 Or. 183 ( 9 Pac. 284 ); State v. Hawkins, 18 Or. 478 ( 23 Pac. 475 ); State v. Fiester, 32 Or. 260 ( 50 Pac. 561 ); State v. Howe, 27 Or. 146 ( 44 Pac. 672 ); State v. … Brown, 7 Or. 187 ; State v. Wintzingerode, 9 Or. 157 ; State v. Lee Yan Yan, 10 Or. 366 ; State v. Dilley, 15 Or. 73 ( 13 Pac. 648 ); State v. Ah Lee, 18 Or. 540 ( 23 Pac. 424 ); State v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Moore v. Moore

    121 Or. 48 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 23, 1926

    Warren, supra, has been cited with approval in Bilyeu v. Crouch, 96 Or. 66 ( 189 Pac. 222 ), and in Imbrie v. … McBride, Bean and Brown, JJ., concur.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Finney v. Stanfield Fraternal Ass'n

    131 Or. 393 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 28, 1929

    Bank, supra; Farmers Loan & Trust Co. v. Brown, 182 Iowa, 1044 ( 165 N. W. 70 ); Hughes v. Nelson, 29 N. J. Eq. 547, 550. As stated in I Daniel on Neg. Instruments, § 664, (a) quoted from in note to Bank v. … See Simpson v. Bank, supra.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Ragnone v. Portland School District No. 1J

    291 Or. 617 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 22, 1981

    This concept of negligence is much like that expressed in an early leading case on the subject, Brown v. … It appears that the concept of what is negligence has remained about the same over the years from Brown v. Kendall, supra, until the present.

    Cited 32 timesPublished
  • PacifiCorp v. Dept. of Rev.

    374 Or. 189 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 18, 2025

    See AFSCME Local 2623 v. … Bd. of Equalization v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Smith v. Providence Health & Services - Oregon

    361 Or. 456 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 11, 2017

    Plaintiff’s position is analagous to the extension of the cause of action for common-law wrongful discharge in Brown v. Transcon Lines, 284 Or 597, 588 P2d 1087 (1978). … Co. v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals v. Institutional Animal Care & Use Committee

    312 Or. 95 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 19, 1991

    Newspaper Pub. v. Peterson, 244 Or 116 , 415 P2d 21 (1966). See Marbet v. Portland Gen. … Peterson, supra, this court held that a newspaper association had standing under the APA to challenge a regulation of the Pharmacy Board prohibiting drug stores from advertising prescription drugs, even though the newspaper

    Cited 28 timesPublished
  • State v. Blair

    361 Or. 527 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 15, 2017

    Bonilla, 358 Or at 480; State v. Brown, 348 Or 293, 305, 232 P3d 962 (2010). Of course, that rationale presumes that a person to whom a privacy interest belongs actually intends to give consent to the intrusion. … See, e.g., State v.

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • State v. Warner

    342 Or. 361 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 15, 2007

    State v. … See State v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Hammond Lumber Co. v. Public Service Commission

    96 Or. 595 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 11, 1920

    Co. v. Railroad Commission, 156 Wis. 47 ( 145 N. … And in State v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Ranzau v. Davis

    85 Or. 26 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 3, 1917

    This suit involves the question as to whether or not the farm described in the complaint is subject to an execution upon a judgment in favor of defendant Davis obtained for services performed, boarding help, and expenses … Coal Co. v. Dyett, 7 Paige (N. Y.), 9; Mathews v. Stephenson, 6 Pa. St. 496; Woddrop v. Weed, 154 Pa. St. 307 ( 26 Atl. 375 , 35 Am. St. Rep. 832 ). 6.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Trees v. Ordonez

    354 Or. 197 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 3, 2013

    R. v. … Monk v.

    Cited 32 timesPublished
  • Foster v. Clark

    309 Or. 464 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 21, 1990

    See also Oregon Aqua-Foods v. … Holmes v. Appling, supra; Whitbeck v. Funk, supra; Monahan v. Funk, supra. See also City of Eugene v.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • City of Portland v. Dollarhide

    300 Or. 490 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 4, 1986

    Harlow v. … As long as a city ordinance employs civil or administrative procedures and sanctions lacking punitive significance, see Brown v. Multnomah County Dist.

    Cited 43 timesPublished
  • In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Fadeley

    310 Or. 548 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 19, 1990

    Commercial speech, as defined by the Court, is speech which does no more than propose a commercial transaction, Board of Trustees of State University of New York v. … Fox,_US_,_, 109 S Ct 3028, 3036 , 106 L Ed 2d 388 (1989); Bolger v. Youngs Drug Products Corp., 463 US 60, 66 , 103 S Ct 2875 , 77 L Ed 2d 469 (1983); Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v.

    Cited 46 timesPublished
  • In Re Lowengart's Estate

    160 Or. 118 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 13, 1938

    Girard Trust Company, 11 Fed. (2d) 520; Corliss v. Bowers, 281 U. S. 376, 378 ( 50 S. Ct. 336 , 74 L. Ed. 916 ); In re Estate of Schuh, Brown v. Hauck, 66 Mont. 50 ( 212 P. 516 ). … But in Saltonstall v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • State v. King

    Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 13, 2017

    In Browne & Co. v. John P. … Rise v. Board of Parole, 304 Or 385, 390, 745 P2d 1210 (1987).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Hemenway

    Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 10, 2013

    See Brown v. … In Smothers v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Farber

    295 Or. 199 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 29, 1983

    United States v. Peacock, 654 F2d 339, 349 (5th Cir 1981); United States v. Papia, 560 F2d 827, 836 n. 3 (7th Cir 1977); Ottomano v. … Brown, 460 US 730 , 103 S Ct 1535 , 75 L Ed 2d 502 (1983), a four-person plurality is not binding precedent. 12 The present statute specifically mentions this instance.

    Cited 23 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.