Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
8,515 results
2.76s
106 Or. 211 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 9, 1923
In the case of State v. … State v. Weiss, 63 Or. 462, 466 ( 128 Pac. 448 ); State v.
Cited 23 timesPublished72 Or. 57 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 16, 1914
O’Neil, 13 Or. 183 ( 9 Pac. 284 ); State v. Hawkins, 18 Or. 478 ( 23 Pac. 475 ); State v. Fiester, 32 Or. 260 ( 50 Pac. 561 ); State v. Howe, 27 Or. 146 ( 44 Pac. 672 ); State v. … Brown, 7 Or. 187 ; State v. Wintzingerode, 9 Or. 157 ; State v. Lee Yan Yan, 10 Or. 366 ; State v. Dilley, 15 Or. 73 ( 13 Pac. 648 ); State v. Ah Lee, 18 Or. 540 ( 23 Pac. 424 ); State v.
Cited 12 timesPublished121 Or. 48 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 23, 1926
Warren, supra, has been cited with approval in Bilyeu v. Crouch, 96 Or. 66 ( 189 Pac. 222 ), and in Imbrie v. … McBride, Bean and Brown, JJ., concur.
Cited 0 timesPublishedFinney v. Stanfield Fraternal Ass'n
131 Or. 393 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 28, 1929
Bank, supra; Farmers Loan & Trust Co. v. Brown, 182 Iowa, 1044 ( 165 N. W. 70 ); Hughes v. Nelson, 29 N. J. Eq. 547, 550. As stated in I Daniel on Neg. Instruments, § 664, (a) quoted from in note to Bank v. … See Simpson v. Bank, supra.
Cited 1 timesPublishedRagnone v. Portland School District No. 1J
291 Or. 617 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 22, 1981
This concept of negligence is much like that expressed in an early leading case on the subject, Brown v. … It appears that the concept of what is negligence has remained about the same over the years from Brown v. Kendall, supra, until the present.
Cited 32 timesPublished374 Or. 189 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 18, 2025
See AFSCME Local 2623 v. … Bd. of Equalization v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedSmith v. Providence Health & Services - Oregon
361 Or. 456 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 11, 2017
Plaintiff’s position is analagous to the extension of the cause of action for common-law wrongful discharge in Brown v. Transcon Lines, 284 Or 597, 588 P2d 1087 (1978). … Co. v.
Cited 9 timesPublishedPeople for the Ethical Treatment of Animals v. Institutional Animal Care & Use Committee
312 Or. 95 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 19, 1991
Newspaper Pub. v. Peterson, 244 Or 116 , 415 P2d 21 (1966). See Marbet v. Portland Gen. … Peterson, supra, this court held that a newspaper association had standing under the APA to challenge a regulation of the Pharmacy Board prohibiting drug stores from advertising prescription drugs, even though the newspaper
Cited 28 timesPublished361 Or. 527 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 15, 2017
Bonilla, 358 Or at 480; State v. Brown, 348 Or 293, 305, 232 P3d 962 (2010). Of course, that rationale presumes that a person to whom a privacy interest belongs actually intends to give consent to the intrusion. … See, e.g., State v.
Cited 25 timesPublished342 Or. 361 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 15, 2007
State v. … See State v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedHammond Lumber Co. v. Public Service Commission
96 Or. 595 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 11, 1920
Co. v. Railroad Commission, 156 Wis. 47 ( 145 N. … And in State v.
Cited 15 timesPublished85 Or. 26 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 3, 1917
This suit involves the question as to whether or not the farm described in the complaint is subject to an execution upon a judgment in favor of defendant Davis obtained for services performed, boarding help, and expenses … Coal Co. v. Dyett, 7 Paige (N. Y.), 9; Mathews v. Stephenson, 6 Pa. St. 496; Woddrop v. Weed, 154 Pa. St. 307 ( 26 Atl. 375 , 35 Am. St. Rep. 832 ). 6.
Cited 3 timesPublished354 Or. 197 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 3, 2013
R. v. … Monk v.
Cited 32 timesPublished309 Or. 464 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 21, 1990
See also Oregon Aqua-Foods v. … Holmes v. Appling, supra; Whitbeck v. Funk, supra; Monahan v. Funk, supra. See also City of Eugene v.
Cited 23 timesPublishedCity of Portland v. Dollarhide
300 Or. 490 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 4, 1986
Harlow v. … As long as a city ordinance employs civil or administrative procedures and sanctions lacking punitive significance, see Brown v. Multnomah County Dist.
Cited 43 timesPublishedIn Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Fadeley
310 Or. 548 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 19, 1990
Commercial speech, as defined by the Court, is speech which does no more than propose a commercial transaction, Board of Trustees of State University of New York v. … Fox,_US_,_, 109 S Ct 3028, 3036 , 106 L Ed 2d 388 (1989); Bolger v. Youngs Drug Products Corp., 463 US 60, 66 , 103 S Ct 2875 , 77 L Ed 2d 469 (1983); Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v.
Cited 46 timesPublished160 Or. 118 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 13, 1938
Girard Trust Company, 11 Fed. (2d) 520; Corliss v. Bowers, 281 U. S. 376, 378 ( 50 S. Ct. 336 , 74 L. Ed. 916 ); In re Estate of Schuh, Brown v. Hauck, 66 Mont. 50 ( 212 P. 516 ). … But in Saltonstall v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedOregon Supreme Court · Jul 13, 2017
In Browne & Co. v. John P. … Rise v. Board of Parole, 304 Or 385, 390, 745 P2d 1210 (1987).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOregon Supreme Court · Jan 10, 2013
See Brown v. … In Smothers v.
Cited 0 timesPublished295 Or. 199 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 29, 1983
United States v. Peacock, 654 F2d 339, 349 (5th Cir 1981); United States v. Papia, 560 F2d 827, 836 n. 3 (7th Cir 1977); Ottomano v. … Brown, 460 US 730 , 103 S Ct 1535 , 75 L Ed 2d 502 (1983), a four-person plurality is not binding precedent. 12 The present statute specifically mentions this instance.
Cited 23 timesPublished
Ask Donna