Case law

Oregon Fire/Police Retirement Committee v. Oregon Public Employes' Retirement Board

296 Or. 464 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1984

The court wrote: “Springfield Education Assn. v. School Dist., 290 Or 217 , 621 P2d 547 (1980), held that three different types of terms are in statutes which govern agencies: “ T.) … Compare Addison v. Holly Hill Co., 322 US 607 , 64 S Ct 1215 , 88 L Ed 1488 (1944).

State Ex Rel. State Land Board v. Corvallis Sand & Gravel Co.

272 Or. 545 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 12, 1975

The history of this litigation and the numerous legal and factual issues are set forth in the opinion of the Court of Appeals, Land Bd. v. Corvallis Sand & Gravel, 18 Or App 524 , 526 P2d 469 (1974). … evidence in the record to support either the theory that Fischer Cut of the Willamette was formed by an “avulsive” process or by the “exception to the accretion rule” process as described by the federal court in Commissioners v.

In Re Schmalz

169 Or. 518 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 17, 1942

Brown now”. … Brown, deceased.

Board of Directors of North Unit Irr. Dist. Gard v. Peck

91 Or. 33 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 21, 1919

L., and the decisions of this court applying the same are plain and leave no room for argument: See Rynearson v. Union County, 54 Or. 181 ( 102 Pac. 785 ); Watson v. … L., §§ 14, 15, p. 991; City of Lindsay v. Mack, 160 Cal. 647 ( 117 Pac. 924 ); State v. Park Ridge, 61 N. J. Law, 151 ( 38 Atl. 750 ); City of Chanute v. Davis, 85 Kan. 188 ( 116 Pac. 367 ).

Waxwing Cedar Products, Ltd. v. Koennecke

278 Or. 603 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 7, 1977

Browne, refused Browne admittance to the office, and ejected Browne from the premises. … Wagner v. Savage, as Adm’r, 195 Or 128, 147 , 244 P2d *611 161 (1952); Jarvy v.

Florey v. Coleman

114 Or. 1 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 17, 1925

BROWN, J. … L.; Morrow County v. Hendryx, 14 Or. 397 ( 12 Pac. 806 ). Does the law empower ns to require the assessor to deliver the assessment roll to the clerk of Jackson County? Section 4291, Or.

Holmes v. Whitaker

23 Or. 319 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 26, 1892

v. … Dec. 374 ); Sawtelle v. Drew, 122 Mass. *324 229 ; Dawson v. Kittle, 4 Hill, 107 ; note to Wigglesworth v. Dallison, 1 Smith’s Leading Cases (7 Am. ed.), 904. “It has long been settled,” says Baron' Parke, in Hutton v.

Perez v. Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision

327 Or. 595 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 22, 1998

965 P.2d 1023 (1998) 327 Or. 595 Raul Sanchez PEREZ, Petitioner on Review, v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION, Respondent on Review. CA A90127; SC S43927. Supreme Court of Oregon. October 22, 1998. Eric M. … The order of the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision is vacated. The case is remanded to the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision for further consideration in light of Noble v.

Hibbard v. Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision

327 Or. 594 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 22, 1998

965 P.2d 1022 (1998) 327 Or. 594 Nolan Burgess HIBBARD, Petitioner on Review, v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION, Respondent on Review. CA A88222; SC S43831. Supreme Court of Oregon. October 22, 1998. … The order of the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision is vacated. The case is remanded to the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision for further consideration in light of Noble v.

Garratt v. Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision

327 Or. 596 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 22, 1998

GARRATT, Petitioner on Review, v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION, Respondent on Review. CA A90817; SC S43921. Supreme Court of Oregon. October 22, 1998. Hari Nam S. … The order of the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision is vacated. The case is remanded to the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision for further consideration in light of Noble v.

Eugene v. Lane County

50 Or. 468 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 7, 1908

It is held in Brown v. School District, 12 Or. 345 ( 7 Pac. 357 ), that the collection of a void tax may be enjoined, or payment thereof may be made under protest and the amount recovered back. … See, also, Lovingston et al. v. Board of Trustees, 99 Ill. 564 ; O'Neal v. Board of School Com'rs, 27 Md. 227 .

Penrod v. Cupp

284 Or. 417 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 29, 1978

Petitioners in these habeas corpus cases, Penrod v. Cupp and Brown v. Cupp, 283 Or 21 , 581 P2d 934 (1978), were represented by counsel appointed by the circuit court for Marion County. … State v. Jamison, 251 Or 114, 120 , 444 P2d 15 , 444 P2d 1005 (1968).

Board of Directors of Northern Wasco County People's Utility District v. Kelly

171 Or. 691 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 10, 1943

Brown: People’s Utility Districts in Oregon, 20 Ore. L. Rev., 3, 22. In In re Harper Irr. … In Clam, River Electric Co. v.

School Board of School District No. U2-20 JT. v. Fanning

232 Or. 593 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 12, 1962

The judgment of the lower court is affirmed. ① Board of Education of Louisville v. Williams, 256 SW2d 29, 30 (Ky 1953). See, Small v. … Contra, Middlesex Theatre v. Commissioner of State Police, 28 Conn 20, 20 A2d 412 (1941) (open air theatre—building code capacity provision); Board of Education of Louisville v.

In re John's Will

30 Or. 494 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 21, 1896

Ct. 327); Kain v. Gibbonev, 101 U. S. 362 ; *521 and Jackson v. Phillips, 14 Allen, 588 . In Magill v. Brown, Brightley N. … Brown, Bright, 347, 348. In Bartlett v. Nye, 4 Met.

Snow v. Oregon State Penitentiary

308 Or. 259 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 29, 1989

State v. Brown, supra, 297 Or at 442 . … Constitutional due process is satisfied by an even lower standard, viz., if there is any evidence in the record that could support the conclusion reached by a disciplinary board. See Superintendent v.

Young v. Columbia Land & Inv. Co.

53 Or. 438 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 9, 1909

In Higgins v. Lansingh, 154 Ill. 301, 384 ( 40 N. E. 362, 387 ), it appears that Higgins owned such a large interest in the company that he practically controlled it. … This principle in *443 no way conflicts with the case of Seymour v. S. F. C. Ass’n, 144 N. Y. 333 ( 39 N. E. 365 : 26 L. R. A. 859), relied upon by plaintiffs.

Wehrung v. Portland Country Club

61 Or. 48 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 6, 1912

Brown v. Moore, 3 Or. 435, 438 . … L.; Stokes v. Brown, 20 Or. 530 ( 26 Pac. 561 ) ; Denn v. Peters, 36 Or. 486, 490 ( 59 Pac. 1109 ); Creecy v. Joy, 40 Or. 28, 31 ( 66 Pac. 295 ).

BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF CLACKAMAS COUNTY VECTOR CONTROL DIST. v. Knight

345 Or. 158 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 23, 2008

190 P.3d 379 (2008) 345 Or. 158 BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF CLACKAMAS COUNTY VECTOR CONTROL DIST. v. KNIGHT. No. (S055903). Supreme Court of Oregon. July 23, 2008. Petition for review denied.

Caren v. Providence Health Sys. Or. (In re Caren)

365 Or. 466 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 8, 2019

See Brown v. SAIF , 361 Or. 241 , 283, 391 P.3d 773 (2017) (explaining that process for construing a different provision of chapter 656). … Brown v. SAIF , 361 Or. 241 , 272, 391 P.3d 773 (2017).