Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
8,515 results
1.65s
112 Or. 353 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 22, 1924
In the case of Attwood v. … Grossman, 31 Ind. 223 ; Hess v. Young, 59 Ind. 379 ; Tuck v. Downing, 76 Ill. 71 ; Schwabacker v. Riddle, 99 Ill. 343 ; Insurance Co. v. Reed, 33 Ohio St. 283 ; Brown v. Leach, 107 Mass. 364 ; Poland v.
Cited 11 timesPublished37 Or. 287 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 5, 1900
In support of the position for which they contend, counsel cite the cases of Helm v. Chapman, 66 Cal. 291 ( 5 Pac. 352 ), and Williams v. Mountaineer Gold Min. … In Williams v. Toledo Coal Co. 25 Or. 426 ( 42 Am. St.
Cited 5 timesPublishedState Ex Rel. Sports Management News, Inc. v. Nachtigal
324 Or. 80 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 29, 1996
Also on the drawing board is a reduction of foam to foam-less midsole and a three-dimensional frame to attach to the PODS outriggers.” … Interpretation of that provision most frequently begins with State v. Robertson, 293 Or 402 , 649 P2d 569 (1982); and State v.
Cited 4 timesPublished142 Or. 503 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 3, 1933
In O’Conner v. … Janin v. Browne, 59 Cal. 37 ; Bank v. Betts’ Estate, 103 Kan. 807 ( 176 P. 660 , 3 A. L. R. 1604); Bambrick v. Webster Groves Presb. Church Assoc., 53 Mo. App. 225 ; Russell v. Buckhout, 87 Hun. 46 (34 N. Y.
Cited 16 timesPublished84 Or. 224 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 1, 1917
Bank v. Fire Assn., 33 Or. 172 ( 53 Pac. 8); State v. Barrett, 33 Or. 194 ( 54 Pac. 807 ); Everart v. Fischer, 75 Or. 316, 328 ( 147 Pac. 189 ). … Co., 79 Or. 403, 408 ( 155 Pac. 375 ); Childers v. Brown, 81 Or. 1 ( 158 Pac. 166 ). The evidence on this and other points was amply sufficient to be submitted to the jury.
Cited 13 timesPublished291 Or. 343 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 8, 1981
Brown, Atty. Gen., and John R. McCulloch Jr., Sol. Gen., Salem. John Henry Hingson, III, Oregon City, argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent. … United States v.
Cited 30 timesPublishedKoch v. Southern Pacific Company
266 Or. 335 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 10, 1973
Brown v. Spokane, P. & S. … In Clements v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry.
Cited 16 timesPublishedFriends of Oregon v. LCDC (Curry Co.)
301 Or. 447 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 12, 1986
V. … Marion County Board of Commissioners, 1 Or.LUBA 164, 170 (1980) (needs for non-farm, non-forest industrial uses must be satisfied from land included within UGB); Sandy v.
Cited 32 timesPublishedAmerican Petrofina Co. of Texas v. D & L Oil Supply, Inc.
283 Or. 183 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 1, 1978
Insurers v. Bessonette, 241 Or 500, 506 , 405 P2d 529 (1965); Brown v. Eakins, 220 Or 122, 124 , 348 P2d 1116 (1960); Newlee v. Heyting, 167 Or 288, 292 , 117 *195 P2d 829 (1941). … In Dean v.
Cited 21 timesPublished292 Or. 254 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 29, 1981
Daugherty v. … See Blair v. Mt. Hood Meadows Dev. Corp., supra ; Baccelleri v.
Cited 14 timesPublished56 Or. 524 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 24, 1910
Co. v. Porter, 52 Or. 318, 331 ( 95 Pac. 1 : 97 Pac. 541 ). 3. … To the same effect, see Luck v. Robinson, 30 Ga. 55, 59 ; Montgomery v. Brush, 121 Ill. 513, 524 ( 13 N. E. 230 ); Ibbitson v. Brown, 5 Iowa, 532, 534 ; Faulkner v. Whitaker, 15 N. J. Law, 438, 440.
Cited 5 timesPublished329 Or. 47 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 9, 1999
In Still v. … See, e.g., Wampler v.
Cited 95 timesPublished361 Or. 314 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 20, 2017
South Beach Marina, Inc. v. Dept. of Rev., 301 Or 524, 531 , 724 P2d 788 (1986). However, we recently explained in Lake Oswego Preservation Society v. … Brown v. SAIF, 361 Or 241, 269 , 391 P3d 773 (2017).
Cited 64 timesPublished209 Or. 80 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 5, 1956
Co. v. … We hold that this case is controlled by the decisions in Drake Lumber Co. v. Paget Mortgage Co. and Ross v. Robinson, both supra, and Board of Medical Examiners v. Buck, 192 Or 66 , 232 P2d 791 .
Cited 8 timesPublishedRosentool v. Bonanza Oil and Mine Corp.
221 Or. 520 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 11, 1960
Bernert v. … Gustafson Co. v.
Cited 18 timesPublished140 Or. 371 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 29, 1932
On a prosecution for larceny by embezzlement, it is necessary to show that the property belonged to some one other than the person indicted: State v. Stearns, 28 Or. 262 ( 42 Pac. 615 ); State v. … The instant case is easily distinguished from State v. Minnick, 54 Or. 94 , ( 102 Pac. 605 ); State v. Hunsaher, 16 Or. 497 ( 19 Pac. 605 ); State v. Evans, 98 Or. 214 ( 192 Pac. 1062 , 193 Pac. 927 ). 10.
Cited 6 timesPublished290 Or. 855 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 21, 1981
Smith v. … See Stevenson v. State of Oregon, supra, 290 Or at 11 ; McBride v. Magnuson, supra, 282 Or at 436 ; compare Jarrett v. Wills, supra. 8 Citing Dowell v. Mossberg, 226 Or 173, 181 , 359 P2d 541 (1961); Bales for Food v.
Cited 30 timesPublished309 Or. 464 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 21, 1990
See also Oregon Aqua-Foods v. … Holmes v. Appling, supra; Whitbeck v. Funk, supra; Monahan v. Funk, supra. See also City of Eugene v.
Cited 23 timesPublished361 Or. 47 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 16, 2017
Brown, Chief Deputy Defender, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioner on review. Also on the brief was Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Office of Public Defense Services. Jamie K. … See State v.
Cited 10 timesPublished302 Or. 477 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 13, 1987
The record indicates that Bohemia was paid by the piece or board foot of the finished blanks, and received *481 approximately $2,000 a month from Cascade for the waste wood scavenged for the handle operation. … See Wilson v. P.G.E. Company, supra; Warner v. Synnes, supra.
Cited 35 timesPublished
Ask Donna