Case law

Butcher v. Flagg

185 Or. 471 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 7, 1948

In Warren v. … Co. v.

State v. Schwensen

237 Or. 506 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 20, 1964

State v. Opher, 38 Del 93, 188 A 257; People v. Brengard, 265 NY 100 , 191 NE 850 ; State v. Rounds, 104 Vt 442, 160 A 249; State v. Diebold, 152 Wash 68, 277 P 394 . As stated by the court in State v. … State v. Ely, 237 Or 329 , 390 P2d 348 ; State v. Garrison, supra.

Hall v. State

290 Or. 19 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 4, 1980

McVaigh v. … In Lopp v.

Portland Postal Employees Credit Union v. United States National Bank

171 Or. 40 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 10, 1943

At the times herein mentioned none of the executive officers or members of the board or committees received any compensation for services, except the treasurer. … In Sawtelle v.

Cederson v. Oregon Navigation Co.

38 Or. 343 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 12, 1900

Co. v. … The house was separated from the track by a board fence six feet high, through which was a door used by the inmates to pass out, and thence across the track, for the purpose of depositing ashes and garbage in barrels kept

State v. Huntley

302 Or. 418 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 30, 1986

Hunter, 58 Or App 99 , 647 P2d 943 (1982), rev den 294 Or 391 (1983); State v. Sanders, 35 Or App 503 , 582 P2d 22 (1978), rev den 285 Or 195 (1979); and State v. Klenk, 19 Or App 684 , 528 P2d 1092 (1974). … See, e.g., Arizona Board of Pardons and Paroles, Parole Risk Assessment — An Overview (Feb 1986); Baird & Lerner, A Survey of the Use of Guidelines and Risk Assessments by State Parole Boards, National Council on Crime and

Terry v. Multnomah County

279 Or. 127 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 12, 1977

That approval was then reversed by the Board of Commissioners of Multnomah County. … In Butler v.

Albrecht v. Safeway Stores, Inc.

159 Or. 331 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 4, 1938

Takakura, supra; Cardinal v. Reinecke, supra; Peronto v. Cootware, 281 Mich. 664 ( 275 N. W. 724 ); McCann v. Hoffman, supra. … Surely it was not necessary to have a meeting of the board of directors to authorize its district manager to secure the services of some person to aid in the furtherance of the company business.

Hicks v. Peninsula Lumber Co.

109 Or. 305 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 13, 1923

Rep. 456 ); Johnson v. Spear, 76 Mich. 139 ( 42 N. W. 1092 , 15 Am. St. Rep. 298 ); Coughtry v. Woolen Co., 56 N. Y. 124 ( 15 Am. Rep. 387 ); Coughlin v. The Rheola, 19 Fed. 926 ; Cliffe v. Pacific Mail S. S. … J., and Bean and Brown, JJ., concur.

State v. Beals

73 Or. 442 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 8, 1914

L., provides for the issuance of a writ of mandamus as follows: “It may be issued to any inferior court, corporation, board, officer or person, to compel the perform *446 anee of an act which the law specially enjoins, as … In United States v. Boutwell, 17 Wall. 604, 607 ( 21 L.

Palm v. Smith

183 Or. 617 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 3, 1948

LaFollett v. LaFollett, 136 Or. 332 , 288 P. 507 , 299 P. 299 ; Matlock v. Matlock, 87 Or. 307 , 170 P. 528 ; Ex parte Bowers, 78 Or. 390 , 153 P. 412 ; 21 C. J. S. 745, § 492. … Defendants Smith rely strongly on McClain et ux v. Superior Court of Chelan County, 112 Wash. 260 , 191 P. 852 .

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Nuss

335 Or. 368 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 17, 2003

A trial panel of the Disciplinary Board agreed with the Bar and imposed a public reprimand. … See Gilmore v.

ZRZ Realty Co. v. Beneficial Fire & Casualty Insurance

349 Or. 117 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 14, 2010

Hall v. … The court explained in Brown v.

Pointer v. Osborne

158 Or. 573 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 2, 1938

In the recent case of Koski v. … Anderson, supra; Layman v. Heard, 156 Or. 94 ( 66 P. (2d) 492 ); Herzog v. Mittleman, 155 Or. 624 ( 65 P. (2d) 384 , 109 A. L. R. 662); Storm v. Thompson, 155 Or. 686 ( 64 P. (2d) 1309 ); Younger v.

Brazeale v. State Industrial Accident Commission

190 Or. 565 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 21, 1951

partnership, which conducted a lumbering operation under the assumed name of Lucky Pour Logging Company, to haul for it exclusively, to the extent of its *569 requirements, for a consideration of an agreed price per thousand board … In this connection respondent cites Stuhr v.

Hodges v. OAK Tree Realtors, Inc.

363 Or. 601 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 13, 2018

State v. Walker , 356 Or. 4 , 13, 333 P.3d 316 (2014). B. … See, e.g. , Spellman v. American Sec.

State Ex Rel. Stadter v. Newbry

196 Or. 331 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 10, 1952

See, State v. Stannard, 84 Or 450, 453 , 165 P 566 , 165 P 571 . … Perry v. Oregon Liquor Commission, 180 Or 495, 499 , 177 P2d 406 .

Whipple v. Department of Revenue

309 Or. 422 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 6, 1990

Whipple v. Dept. of Rev., 11 OTR 117 (1989). … Franchise Tax Board, 255 CA2d 277, 282, 63 Cal Rptr 326 *428 (1967) (Equal Protection Clause has limited scope in relation to state taxation); Commonwealth v.

Burnett v. Lemon Et Ux.

185 Or. 54 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 25, 1949

Preston v. State Industrial Accident Commission, supra, H. H. Worden Co. v. Beals, 120 Or. 66 , 250 P. 375 . … Also see Call v. Linn, supra.

McKissick v. McKissick

93 Or. 644 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 21, 1918

Chief Justice Moore in Gibbons v. … Justice McBride in Matthews v.