Case law

Smith v. Kay

153 Or. 80 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 13, 1935

See, in this connection: Wapples on Homestead and Exemption, pp. 182-184 and 232-238; Maloney v. Hefer, 75 Cal. 422 ( 17 P. 539 , 7 Am. St. Rep. 180 ); Hoitt v. Webb, 36 N. H. 158; Casselman v. … Brown, 127 Or. 551 ( 272 P. 914 ); Clarke v. Philomath College, 99 Or. 366 ( 193 P. 470 , 195 P. 822 ); Philbrick v. O’Connor, 15 Or. 15 ( 13 P. 612 , 3 Am. St. Rep. 139 ).

Sexton v. Kelly

185 Or. 1 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 9, 1948

price and terms or on such other terms and price as may be agreed to by me * * * I hereby agree to pay you in cash, for your services in connection with this contract, the regular commission fixed by the Portland Realty Board … Burke Machinery Co. v. Copenhagen, 138 Or. 314 , 6 P. (2d) 886 ; Shaver Forwarding Co. v. Eagle Star Ins. Co., 177 Or. 410 , 162 P. (2d) 789 .

Parrish v. Stephens

1 Or. 59 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1853

(Barclay v. Howell, 6 Peters, 498.) … (Rugby Charity v. Merriweather, 11 East, 372, note; Jarvis v. Dean, 3 Bingham, 447; Gamble v. St. Louis, 12 Missouri, 617.) In the St.

State v. Huntley

302 Or. 418 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 30, 1986

Hunter, 58 Or App 99 , 647 P2d 943 (1982), rev den 294 Or 391 (1983); State v. Sanders, 35 Or App 503 , 582 P2d 22 (1978), rev den 285 Or 195 (1979); and State v. Klenk, 19 Or App 684 , 528 P2d 1092 (1974). … See, e.g., Arizona Board of Pardons and Paroles, Parole Risk Assessment — An Overview (Feb 1986); Baird & Lerner, A Survey of the Use of Guidelines and Risk Assessments by State Parole Boards, National Council on Crime and

Andrews v. Spencer

193 Or. 615 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 21, 1951

See Nicholas v. Title & Trust Co., 79 Or 226, 238 , 154 P 391 , Ann Cas 1917A 1149; Leonard v. Howard, 67 Or 203, 213 , 135 P 549 . … Indian Refining Co., v. Royal Oil Co., 102 Cal App 710, 283 P 856, 857 ; Goldberg, Bowen & Co. v. Dimick, 169 Cal 187, 146 P 672 ; Carver Sound Equipment Co. v. Tonahill, Tex Civ App, 128 SW2d 860, 861 .

Coos Bay Railroad v. Wieder

26 Or. 453 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 26, 1894

In Rex v. … An action upon an auditor’s bond is not an adequate remedy, where he refuses to issue a county warrant directed to be issued by a board of supervisors, and mandamus will lie: Babcock v. Goodrich, 47 Cal. 509 .

Slusher v. Coates

120 Or. 338 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 25, 1926

Robinson, 26 Wash. 117 ( 66 Pac. 119 ); Oxsheer v. Nave, 90 Tex. 568 ( 40 So. 7 , 37 L. R. A. 98); Ayers v. King, 168 Mo. 244 ( 67 S. W. 558 , 90 Am. St. Rep. 452 ), and earlier cases cited therein; Streety v. … Brown, J., does not participate in this opinion.

Harder Et Ux. v. City of Springfield

192 Or. 676 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 17, 1951

Manary, 123 Or. 354, 363 , 260 P. 214 , 262 P. 263 ; Thompson v. Thompson, 79 Or. 513, 516 , 155 P. 1190 ; Binhoff v. State, 49 Or. 419, 421 , 90 P. 586 . … Those so referred to by the appellant are Gabriel Powder & Supply Co. v. Thompson, 163 Or. 623 , 97 P. 2d 182 ; Schram v. Manary, supra; Herrett v.

Cancilla v. Gehlhar

145 Or. 184 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 23, 1933

Kansas City v. Overton, 68 Kan. 560 ( 75 P. 549 ); Anderson v. Thomas, 144 Or. 572 ( 26 P. (2d) 60 ). … L. 178; State v. Briggs, 45 Or. 366 ( 77 P. 750 , 78 P. 361 , 2 Ann Cas. 424); White v. Mears, 44 Or. 215 ( 74 P. 931 ).

Morris, Mather & Co. v. Port of Astoria

141 Or. 251 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 20, 1932

In Kinney v. … J., Brown, Band, Belt, Campbell and Kelly, JJ., concur.

Yancy v. Shatzer

337 Or. 345 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 16, 2004

Brown v. Oregon State Bar, 293 Or. 446, 449 , 648 P.2d 1289 (1982). … Maxian v. Brown, 77 N.Y.2d 422, 425 , 568 N.Y.S.2d 575 , 570 N.E.2d 223, 224 (1991) (recognizing exception to mootness doctrine when issue is "capable of repetition, yet evading review"). North Carolina: Simeon v.

Spaulding v. Miller

221 Or. 503 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 6, 1960

In State v. … Bean v. Pettengill, 57 Or 22, 23 , 109 P 865 .

Clough v. Dawson

69 Or. 52 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 8, 1913

O’Donovan, 65 Or. 1 ( 130 Pac. 393 ); Kabat v. Moore, 48 Or. 191, 198 ( 85 Pac. 506 ). 2. … In order for her to ratify and obtain the benefit of the deal, she must assume the burden of the whole transaction: Porter v. O’Donovan, 65 Or. 1 ( 130 Pac. 393); Grover v.

Palm v. Smith

183 Or. 617 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 3, 1948

LaFollett v. LaFollett, 136 Or. 332 , 288 P. 507 , 299 P. 299 ; Matlock v. Matlock, 87 Or. 307 , 170 P. 528 ; Ex parte Bowers, 78 Or. 390 , 153 P. 412 ; 21 C. J. S. 745, § 492. … Defendants Smith rely strongly on McClain et ux v. Superior Court of Chelan County, 112 Wash. 260 , 191 P. 852 .

Pocholec v. GIUSTINA

224 Or. 245 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 12, 1960

And in Cicero State Bank v. … Hayko v. Colorado & Utah Coal Co., 77 Colo 143, 235 P 373 , 39 ALR 482 (1925); Goss v. Shawnee Post No. 3204, V.F.W. of U.S., 265 SW2d 799 (Ky 1954); Brown v. Salt Lake City, 33 Utah 222 , 93 P 570 (1908); Heva v.

Hatcher v. Briggs

6 Or. 31 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1876

(Mulford v. Brown, 1 Stock, ch. 800; Segee v. Thomas, 3 Black. C. C. 11.) This latter case is in some respects similar to the one under consideration. … (Corwin v.

Butcher v. Flagg

185 Or. 471 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 7, 1948

In Warren v. … Co. v.

Hall v. State

290 Or. 19 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 4, 1980

McVaigh v. … In Lopp v.

Powers v. Officer Cheeley

307 Or. 585 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 4, 1989

Co. v. … Brown, 297 Or 404, 443 , 687 P2d 751 (1984) (“[n]o witness may pass on the credibility of another witness”); State v.

Cederson v. Oregon Navigation Co.

38 Or. 343 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 12, 1900

Co. v. … The house was separated from the track by a board fence six feet high, through which was a door used by the inmates to pass out, and thence across the track, for the purpose of depositing ashes and garbage in barrels kept