Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersor

8,515 results

2.08s

  • DeJonge v. Mutual of Enumclaw

    315 Or. 237 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 31, 1992

    In Paulson v. … Vision v. Fireman’s Fund Ins. Companies, supra; Wyoming Sawmills v. Transportation Ins. Co., supra; Schaeffer v. Mill Owners Ins.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Capital Lumbering Co. v. Hall

    9 Or. 93 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1881

    It also cites Chism v. … Brown, supra).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Goodin v. Cornelius

    101 Or. 422 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 27, 1921

    In order that such an agreement may be enforced by a court of equity, it must be clear, definite, certain, just, reasonable, and mutual in all its parts: Odell v. Morin, 5 Or. 96 ; Brown v. … Lord, 7 Or. 302 ; Wagonblast v. Whitney, 12 Or. 83 ( 6 Pac. 399 ); Knight v. Alexander, 42 Or. 521 ( 71 Pac. 567 ); Tucker v. Kirkpatrick, 86 Or. 681 ( 169 Pac. 117 ).

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Adskim v. Oregon-Washington Railroad & Navigation Co.

    129 Or. 169 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 14, 1929

    In Millen v. … J., and Brown and Belt, JJ., concur.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Muzzy v. Wilson

    259 Or. 512 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 11, 1971

    City of Scottsdale v. Mocho, 8 Ariz App 146, 444 P2d 437, 441-442 (1968); Hofgesang v. Woodbine Avenue Realty Company, 414 SW2d 580, 585 (Ky 1967); Town of Eunice v. Childs, 205 S2d 897, 899 (La App 1967); Shia v. … See Cohen v. Board of Trustees of Immanuel Baptist Ch., *522 276 SW2d 26 (Ky 1955); Flaherty v. Fleming, 58 W Va 669, 52 SE 857, 859 (1906).

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Chauncey v. Wollenberg

    59 Or. 214 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 9, 1911

    Windsor v. Simpkins, 19 Or. 117 ( 23 Pac. 669 ); Sterling v. Sterling, 43 Or. 200 ( 72 Pac. 741 ); Frye v. Moffet, 50 Or. 495 ( 93 Pac. 353 ). … Florence v. Hopkins, 46 N. Y. 186 .’” Freem.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Simon v. Northup

    30 L.R.A. 171 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 3, 1895

    Commissioners v. … And in City of Lafayette v.

    Cited 50 timesPublished
  • Watrous v. Salem Brewery Ass'n

    151 Or. 294 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 5, 1935

    The affidavit and facts contained therein substantially comply with the requirements set out in State v. … This question is fully *304 discussed and the authorities collated in Wise v. S. I. A. C., 148 Or. 461 ( 35 P. (2d) 242 ).

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • In Re Grimes' Estate

    170 Or. 204 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 5, 1943

    See Kimbrough v. Pitts, supra, and Twiggs v. Chambers, supra. … Sumpter Valley Railway Company, 88 Or. 554, 581 , 171 P. 202 ; Brown v. Ritterman, 156 Or. 405 , 67 P. (2d) 774 . Had Mrs. Grimes insisted that Mr.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Rayburn Et Ux. v. Crawford Et Ux.

    187 Or. 386 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 12, 1949

    “now have, and have had for some time, a ready sale for said merchantable timber at around $5.00 per thousand board feet, and that if the Court would grant a seven-month extension of time to remove the same from March 15, … Parsons v. Boggie, supra (at page 472).

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Scobey v. Swartz

    176 Or. 654 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 29, 1945

    Ward v. James , 84 Or. 375 , 164 P. 370 , 372 ; Higinbotham v. Frock , 48 Or. 129 , 83 P. 536 , 120 Am. St. Rep. 796 ; Wells Fargo Co. v. Page , 48 Or. 74 , 82 P. 856 , 3 L.R.A. (N.S.) 103; Sievers v. … Brown , 34 Or. 454 , 56 P. 171 , 45 L.R.A. 642 . Ability to perform on the part of plaintiff has neither been pleaded or proven.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • School District No. 1 Ex Rel. Lynch Co. v. Rushlight & Co.

    232 Or. 341 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 24, 1962

    In People, for use of Chasteen, v. … United States v.

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • State v. Moore

    32 Or. 65 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 19, 1897

    In State v. … In State v.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Campbell v. Walker

    137 Or. 375 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 9, 1931

    This rule they applied to appellants as well as to respondents: Seaweard v. … J., Brown and Belt, J'J., concur.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Coca Cola Company v. Department of Revenue

    271 Or. 517 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 1, 1975

    The parent company maintains a specific department or division for the sole purpose of supervising the operation of the bottling subsidiaries through placement of its employees on the corporate boards of the subsidiaries … Haas, Inc. v.

    Cited 45 timesPublished
  • Ward v. McKinley

    97 Or. 45 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 13, 1920

    Co. v. Whitebreast Goal Co., 160 Ill. 85 ( 43 N. E. 774 , 31 L. R. A. 529); Dreiske v. Davis Colliery Co., 156 Ill. App. 291 ; Rice v. Miner, 151 N. Y. Supp. 983 ( 89 Misc. Rep. 395 ). … In McCartney v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Fearing v. Bucher

    328 Or. 367 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 8, 1999

    Boise Cascade Corp. v. Board of Forestry, 325 Or 185, 196-97 , 935 P2d 411 (1997). Conclusions of law alone, however, are insufficient. See Zehr v. … See PGE v.

    Cited 59 timesPublished
  • Atkeson v. Holly

    258 Or. 265 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 24, 1971

    Soon after Anthony moved in with the Hollys it was agreed that he would pay them $300 a month for his board, room and care. In addition, his social security cheek of about $50 a month was given to Mrs. … Geiger v. Palmer, 249 Or 123, 129 , 437 P2d 750 (1968); Cline v. Larson, 234 Or 384, 409 , 383 P2d 74 (1963); Elkin et al. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Barker v. Sonner

    135 Or. 75 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 6, 1930

    In Allen v. … We quote from Vaughan v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Equitable Savings & Loan Ass'n v. State Tax Commission

    251 Or. 70 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 5, 1968

    Savings & Loan Ass’n v. … Co. v. Commissioner, 284 U.S. 552, 562 , Kansas City Southern Ry. Co. v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.