Case law

Allen v. County of Jackson County

340 Or. 146 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 24, 2006

See Bolt v. … On December 7, 1994 — after Ballot Measure 8 had passed, but before it became effective — the Jackson County Board of Commissioners approved Order No. 488-94.

POWERS ET UX. v. Coos Bay Lumber Co.

200 Or. 329 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 25, 1953

Allen v. … Bernards v.

Miller v. Weaver

78 Or. 594 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 14, 1915

In Edgar v. … Coulter, 10 Ohio St. 451 ; Mead v. Pettigrew, 11 S. D. 529 ( 78 N. W. 945 ); Kimball v. Stanton (C. C.), 4 Fed. 325 ; New York Coach & Auto Lamp Co. v. Brown, 82 Misc. Rep. 92 ( 143 N. Y. Supp. 100 ).

Franklin v. Northrup

107 Or. 537 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 22, 1923

Grim, 25 Or. 506 ( 36 Pac. 634 ); Goltra v. Penland, 45 Or. 254 ( 77 Pac. 129 ); Bull v. Payne, 47 Or. 580 ( 84 Pac. 697); Consor v. Andrews, 61 Or. 483 ( 123 Pac. 46 ); Branch v. … J., and Bean and Brown, JJ., concur.

State v. Taylor

364 Or. 364 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 7, 2019

Leland v. … Baze v. Rees , 553 U.S. 35 , 47, 128 S.Ct. 1520 , 170 L.Ed.2d 420 (2008). Oregon's current governor, Kate Brown, announced upon taking office in 2015 that she plans to continue the moratorium.

Shopping Centers of America, Inc. v. Standard Growth Properties, Inc.

265 Or. 405 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 13, 1972

At that time, although it was agreed that the attorneys for both parties would review the proposal further, defendant’s president stated that “It’s all right with me, but it’s subject to the approval of the board of directors … BoUenback v. Continental Casualty Co., 243 Or 498, 508 , 414 P2d 802 (1966); Mohr v. Lear, 239 Or 41, 49 , 395 P2d 117 (1964); Restatement of Contracts § 276. , \.

City of Portland v. Terwilliger

16 Or. 465 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 2, 1888

In Wier v. … (S ohier v. Trinity Church, 109 Mass. 1 ; Stanley v. Colt, 5 Wall. 119 ; Chapin v. Harris, 8 Allen, 594 .) In Wright v.

Hawkins v. Donnerberg

40 Or. 97 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 18, 1901

Co. v. Vason, 52 Ga. 326 ; Cherry v. Lamar, 58 Ga. 541 ; Glenn v. Williams, 60 Md. 93 ; Hawkins v. Glenn, 131 U. S. 319 (9 Sup. Ct. 739); Glenn v. Liggett, 135 U. S. 533 (10 Sup. Ct. 867). … In Brown v. Union Ins. Co. 3 La.

State v. Greene

285 Or. 337 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 27, 1979

State v. Fondren . … Rev. 474 (1961); Abel v.

State v. Poole

161 Or. 481 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 20, 1939

Defendant cites Fredenthal v. Brown, 52 Or. 33 , 95 P. 1114 ; Coggins v. State, 20 Ala. App. 378 , 102 So. 241 . We do not think that these cases are contrary to the rule here announced. *491 In the case of State v. … It is said in State v.

Robinson v. Oregon City Sand & Gravel Co.

143 Or. 177 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 29, 1933

Several cases from the Supreme Court of Massachusetts are cited also, among which are Norcross v. Haskell, 251 Mass. 30 ( 146 N. E. 239 ); Savage v. Welch, 246 Mass. 170 ( 140 N. E. 787 ), and Parker v. Lewis J. … Co. v. Consolidated Cattle Co., supra.

Robinson v. Linn

155 Or. 591 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 16, 1937

J. 259, Section 409; Cox v. Heagy, 184 S. W. 495 ; State Banking Board v. James, 264 S. W. 145 ; Bennington State Bank v. Petersen, 114 Neb. 420 ( 207 N. W. 673 ); Rice v. Rice, 101 Kans. 20 ( 165 P. 799 ). … In Vincent v.

Sertic v. Roberts

171 Or. 121 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 7, 1943

Nessley v. … Bayne v. Brown, 60 Or. 110, 112 , 118 P. 282 . In that case, the plaintiff, Mr. Bayne, sought to invoke the claim of adverse possession by tacking Ms *134 purported adverse possession to that of Mrs.

Morris v. City of Salem

179 Or. 666 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 9, 1946

Co. v. Helena, 47 Mont. 18 , 130 P. 446 ; Peru v. Gleason, 91 Ind. 566 , 575 ; State ex rel. v. Board of Park Commissioners, 100 Minn. *675 150, 110 N.W. 1121 , 9 L.R.A. (N. S.) 1045; Wills v. … In State ex rel. v.

State v. Graf

316 Or. 544 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 17, 1993

At the post-termination hearing, “if the board finds that the action was not taken in good faith for cause, it shall order the immediate reinstatement and the reemployment of the employee in the position without the loss … The judgment of the circuit court is reversed, and the case is remanded to the circuit court for further proceedings. 1 State v.

Matter of Marriage of Meier

286 Or. 437 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 22, 1979

Perley v. Perley, supra, 220 Or at 401 ; Edwards v. Edwards, supra, 191 Or at 280-81 . As stated in Rea v. … In short, the Court of Appeals departed from the rule as stated by this court in cases such as Perley v. Perley, Levell v. Levell, and Edwards v. Edwards, and which we now reaffirm.

Willamette Estates II, LLC v. Dept. of Rev.

Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 9, 2015

Cite as 357 Or 113 (2015) 119 The first case, Bear Creek Plaza v. … See ORS 305.287; Village at Main Street Phase II v. Dept. of Rev., 356 Or 164, 339 P3d 428 (2014). Cite as 357 Or 113 (2015) 121 State v.

Wood v. Woodcock

276 Or. 49 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 3, 1976

See also Thompson v. Scott, 270 Or 542, 551 , 528 P2d 509 (1974). … In Jones v.

Northwest Door Co. v. Lewis Inv. Co.

92 Or. 186 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 29, 1919

Co. v. Stark, 38 Mich. 717 ; Brown v. Congress & B. St. Ry. Co., 49 Micb. 153 ( 13 N. W. 494 ), and we see no good reason for withdrawing that approval.” In Martin et al., v. Texas & Pac. Ry. Co., 87 Tex. 117 ( 26 S. … The rule, relating to an instruction of the character here complained of, is analogous to that announced in Murray v. Murray, 6 Or. 17 ; Langford v. Jones, 18 Or. 307 (22 Pac. 1064 ); Nickum v.

Harrisburg Lumber Co. v. Washburn

29 Or. 150 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 16, 1896

In Hotaling v. … So too in Tredinnick v.