Case law

State v. Nix

355 Or. 777 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 7, 2014

August 7, 2014 777 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON STATE OF OREGON, Petitioner on Review, v. … After all, provi- sions relating to the rights of victims to appear in court, to obtain restitution, and to be heard at sentencing and Parole Board hearings would be difficult to apply were “victims” to include non-human

Hamacher v. TUMY

222 Or. 341 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 11, 1960

In Brown v. Cooley, 56 N M 630, 247 P2d 868 (1952) plaintiff brought an action against the defendant to recover premiums due on certain policies of insurance. … Co. v. Draper, supra; Lawrence v. Francis, supra; Rezac v. Zima, supra; Ames-Brooks Co. v. Aetna Ins. Co., 83 Minn 346, 86 NW 344 (1901); Kor v. American Eagle Fire Ins. Co., supra; Post v.

Whipple v. Howser

291 Or. 475 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 11, 1981

In Kempf v. … Brown v. Portland School Dist. #1, 291 Or 77 , 628 P2d 1183 (1981) (dissenting opinion of Peterson, J.). Similarly, it is reasonable to infer that drivers and insurers governed their affairs as if Smith were law.

State v. Slim and Wolfe

141 Or. 174 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 29, 1932

BROWN, J. The defendant was prosecuted for the crime of robbery, being armed with a dangerous weapon, and was convicted. From the judgment .entered on the verdict rendered, he has appealed. … Logan v. United States, 144 U. S. 263 , 12 Sup. Ct. 617; Sparf v. United States, 156 U. S. 51 , 15 Sup. Ct. 273; Sheppard v. Yocum, 10 Or. 417 ; Osmun v. Winters, 30 Or. 177 , 46 P. 782 ; State v.

State v. Tannehill

341 Or. 205 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 3, 2006

See Carlson v. Myers, 327 Or 213, 226 , 959 P2d 31 (1998) (stating that inquiry); State v. Gulley, 324 Or 57, 66 , 921 P2d 396 (1996) (same). … See Rise v. Board of Parole, 304 Or 385, 392-93 , 745 P2d 1210 (1987) (recognizing that rescission is one remedy for failed plea agreement); Santobello v.

Doyle v. City of Medford

356 Or. 336 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 2, 2014

Co. v. Mowry, 350 Or 686, 695 , 261 P3d 1 (2011) (citing Severy/Wilson v. Board of Parole, 349 Or 461, 474 , 245 P3d 119 (2010)). … Brown v.

Billups v. Colmer

118 Or. 192 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 11, 1926

Co. v. Jones, supra; Alexander v. Kansas City etc. R. R. Co., supra; Bonner v. Rio Grande & So. R. R. Co., 31 Colo. 446 ( 72 Pac. 1065 , 1067); Hamilton v. Spokane, 3 Idaho, 164 ( 28 Pac. 408 ); Lewis v. … J., and Brown and Belt, JJ., concur.

Adams v. Kulongoski

323 Or. 253 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 9, 1996

Hudson, 475 US 292 , 106 S Ct 1066 , 89 L Ed 2d 232 (1986), and Abood v. … Detroit Board of Education, 431 US 209, 222 , 97 S Ct 1782 , 52 L Ed 2d 261 (1977), in regard to collection from non-union employees of their share of union representation costs. See Elvin v.

Eagle Cliff Fishing Co. v. McGowan

70 Or. 1 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 6, 1914

Co. v. Worster, 23 N. H. 462; Alexander v. Tolleston Club, 110 Ill. 65 ; Schmaltz v. York Mfg. Co., 204 Pa. 1 ( 53 Atl. 522 , 93 Am. St. Rep. 782 , 59 L. R. A. 907); Kirklin v. Atlas Sav. & Loan Assn. (Tenn. Ch. … The provisions of the statute regulating the catching of salmon may be summarized as follows: The Governor, the Secretary of State, and State Treasurer constitute the board of fish commissioners, whose duty it is to appoint

State v. Tucker

286 Or. 485 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 5, 1979

In State v. … Brown v. Multnomah County Dist. Ct., 280 Or 95, 108 , 570 P2d 52 (1977), and id. 280 Or at 114 *498 (Holman, J., dissenting).

POWERS ET UX. v. Coos Bay Lumber Co.

200 Or. 329 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 25, 1953

Allen v. … Bernards v.

State v. Walton

50 Or. 142 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 27, 1907

Hardy, 2 Mass. 303 ; Sartorious v. State, 24 Miss. 602 ; Hill v. People, 16 Mich. 351 ; Grigg v. People, 31 Mich. 471 ; State v. Vanhook, 88 Mo. 105 ; State v. Saunders, 53 Mo. 234 ; Beck v. … A. 417 ); Barker v. State, 54 Neb. 53 ( 74 N. W. 427 ); Browning v. State, 54 Neb. 203 ( 74 N. W. 631 ); Hill v. State, 1 Yerg. 76 ( 24 Am. Dec. 441 ); Jefferson v. State, 24 Tex. App. 535 ( 7 S. W. 244 ); Douglass v.

Clanton v. Oregon Kelp-Ore Products Co.

135 Or. 321 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 16, 1931

“Compensation and not forfeiture is a favorite maxim with the courts of equity”: Comstock v. Schiffman et al., 113 Or. 677 ( 234 P. 293 ). … J., Brown and Belt, JJ., concur.

Jg v. Ndg

348 Or. 525 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 15, 2010

See Armstrong v. … Brown v.

McKINZIE v. CLINE

197 Or. 184 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 28, 1953

See Board of Trade v. Christie Grain & Stock Co., 198 US 236 , 49 L ed 1013, 25 S Ct 637 . In the case of Consolidated Boiler Corp. v. … Defendants cite the following cases: Boucher v. Wissman, 206 SW2d 101 ; Schavoir v. American Rebonded Leather Co., 104 Conn 472, 133 A 582; Southwest Specialties Co. v. Eastman, 130 Kan 433, 286 P 225 ; Carver v.

Scott & Payne v. Potomac Insurance Co.

217 Or. 323 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 22, 1959

The board *327 of the hospital district agreed to the change. Accordingly, the steel tubing was installed in lieu of the copper. … White v. Pallay, supra.

Corvallis & Alsea River R. v. Portland E. & E. Ry. Co.

84 Or. 524 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 3, 1917

Co. v. Douglas Co. Bank, 42 Neb. 469 ( 60 N. W. 886 ); Smith v. … It is for that reason assignable as declared by this court in Browne & Co. v. John P. Sharkey Co., 58 Or. 480 , at page 483 ( 115 Pac. 156 , at page 157), wherein Mr. Justice McBride said: “The case of Campbell v.

Carnine v. Tibbetts

158 Or. 21 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 14, 1937

Co. v. Cluck, 97 Tex. 172 ( 77 S. W. 403 , 64 L. R. A. 494, 104 Am. St. Rep. 863 , 1 Ann. Cas. 261); annotation, 51 A. L. R. 183, following the opinion in Brown v. Hutzler Bros. Co., 152 Md. 39 ( 136 Atl. 30 , 51 A. L. … In Foott v.

Hughes v. State of Oregon

314 Or. 1 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 6, 1992

In Brown v. … In Brown v.

Ballard v. Walker Et Ux.

141 Or. 47 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 9, 1932

For recent decisions by this court see Hill v. Harritt, 140 Or. 86 ( 12 P. (2d) 1021 ); and Marion Automobile Co. v. Brown, 127 Or. 551 ( 272 P. 914 ). The evidence was thoroughly sifted out in the circuit court.