Case law

Elliott v. Tillamook County

86 Or. 427 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 27, 1917

In State ex rel. v. … To the same effect see, also, Smith v. Mayor and Council of Dublin, 113 Da. 833 ( 39 S. E. 327 ); Crooke v. Board of Commissioners, 36 Ind. 320 ; Cincinnati etc. R. Co. v. Wells, 39 Ind. 539 ; Mercer County v.

Masterson v. Kennard

140 Or. 288 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 1, 1932

In 1912 the Nevada Ditch Company filed a petition to have the Malheur river and its tributaries adjudicated under the laws of Oregon, and an adjudication was held, and on the 13th of May, 1925, the findings of the water board … Coughanour, 34 Or. 9 ( 54 P. 223 ); Bowman, v. Bowman, 35 Or. 279 ( 57 P. 546 ); Watts v. Spencer, 51 Or. 262 ( 94 P. 39 ); Davis v. Chamberlain, 51 Or. 304 ( 98 P. 154 ).

Lourim v. Swensen

328 Or. 380 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 8, 1999

Boise Cascade Corp. v. Board of Forestry, 325 Or 185, 196-97 , 935 P2d 411 (1997). Conclusions of law alone, however, are insufficient. See Zehr v. … Stanfield v. Laccoarce, 284 Or 651 , 588 P2d 1271 (1978). In Chesterman v.

Bank of California National Ass'n v. Scott

159 Or. 70 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 22, 1938

. *73 After the moneys earned or to be earned by Johnson had been assigned to the bank and while the work was still in progress, Lanra Hotchkiss, at the special instance and request of Johnson, furnished board and provisions … See Earle v. Holman, 154 Or. 578 ( 55 P. (2d) 1097 , 61 P. (2d) 1242 ). In such distribution, the Bank of California was not entitled to participate since it had no claim against the bond. See State v.

State v. Campbell

265 Or. 82 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1973

In State ex rel McNary v. … State v. Brown, 113 Or 149 , 231 P 926 .” See, also, State v. Glenn, 233 Or 566 , 379 P2d 550 (1963) and State v. Blackwell, 241 Or 528 , 407 P2d 6 .17 (1965).

Swaggerty v. Petersen

280 Or. 739 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 28, 1977

Co., 77 Mass (11 Gray) 359 (1858); Bigham v. Winnick, 288 Mich 620 , 286 NW 102 (1939); Cantieny v. Boze, 209 Minn 407, 296 NW 491 (1941); Smith v. Spencer, 81 NJ Eq 389, 87 A 158 (1913). 3 Frankland v. … West View Cemetery Ass’n., 195 Ga 237, 24 SE2d 29 (1943); Louisiana State Board of Medical Exam. v. Banker, 100 So2d 920 (La App 1958); Bayer v. Associated Underwriters, Inc., 402 SW2d 11 (Mo App 1966).

Putnam v. Pacific Monthly Co.

68 Or. 36 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 25, 1913

In Kappes v. Brown Shoe Co., 116 Mo. App. 154 ( 90 S. W. 1158 ), a large number of employees of the defendant were waiting for an elevator to take them down and out of the building at the end of a day’s work. … O’Conner & Co. v. Gillaspy, 170 Ind. 428 ( 83 N. E. 738 ); Binklin v. Acker, *52 125 App. Div. 244 ( 109 N. Y. Supp. 125 ); Goff v. Kokomo Brass Wks., 43 Ind. App. 642 ( 88 N. E. 312 ); Aetitis v.

Hofer v. Gofner

134 Or. 33 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 28, 1930

BROWN, J. This record embraces appeals from two orders made by the circuit court for Multnomah county, Oregon, probate department, in the matter of the estate of Robert Fehlmann, deceased. … trust, it became its duty to determine whether he should be removed or not, and its decision in that regard will not be reviewed on appeal unless abuse appears: In re Holladay’s Estate, 18 Or. 168 ( 22 P. 750 ); McFadden v.

Tobin v. Portland Mills Co.

41 Or. 269 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 21, 1902

v. … The testimony fails to show, as in State v.

State v. White

297 Or. 302 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 26, 1984

Cf, Artman v. Ray, 263 Or 529 , 501 P2d 63 , 502 P2d 1376 (1972). In our initial decision in State v. … About four hours later, four police officers came to defendant’s bedroom in a boarding house and began to question him.

State v. Hoskinson

320 Or. 83 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 9, 1994

Brown, 291 Or 642, 661 , 634 P2d 212 (1981) (Linde, J., concurring) (“for practical reasons [this court] generally respects the voluminous and familiar Fourth Amendment jurisprudence ** * * unless ‘persuasive reasons’ are … Although State v. Ehly, supra, and State v.

State v. Roble-Baker

340 Or. 631 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 25, 2006

See State v. … See State v. Brown, 310 Or 347, 359 , 800 P2d 259 (1990) (stating rule).

Pacific Life Stock Co. v. Isaacs

52 Or. 54 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 30, 1908

It was, therefore, incumbent on plaintiff to offer competent proof of valid selections by Hyde, and of Gentry’s notice or protest of contest: Brown v. Corson, 16 Or. 388 ( 19 Pac. 66 : 21 Pac. 47 ). 6. … Abr. 554; Holcomb v. Rawlyns, Cro. Eliz. 540; Truebee v. Miller, 48 Conn. 347 , s. c. 40 Am. Rep. 177 ; Morgan v. Varick, 8 Wend. (N. Y.) 587; Green v. Biddle, 8 Wheat. (U. S.) 75 ( 5 L. Ed. 547 ). See Bacon v.

Stull v. Porter

100 Or. 514 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 7, 1919

The instructions followed Perkins v. … Brown, J., concurs in result. Burnett, C. J., dissents.

Flanagan v. Flanagan

188 Or. 126 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 17, 1950

L. 1949, ch. 154); Neely v. Neely, 162 Or. 610 , 94 P. (2d) 300 ; Goodman v. Goodman, 165 Or. 141, 149 , 105 P. (2d) 1091 ; Sabot v. Sabot, 97 Wash. 395 , 166 P. 624 ; 17 Am. Jur., Divorce and Separation, § 49, p. 174. … In discussing the question of alimony, we said in Siebert v.

State v. Keenan

307 Or. 515 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 21, 1989

See, e.g., People v. Meredith, 29 Cal 3d 682, 175 Cal Rptr 612, 631 P2d 46 (1981). … State ex rel Hardy v.

Eagle Cliff Fishing Co. v. McGowan

70 Or. 1 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 6, 1914

Co. v. Worster, 23 N. H. 462; Alexander v. Tolleston Club, 110 Ill. 65 ; Schmaltz v. York Mfg. Co., 204 Pa. 1 ( 53 Atl. 522 , 93 Am. St. Rep. 782 , 59 L. R. A. 907); Kirklin v. Atlas Sav. & Loan Assn. (Tenn. Ch. … The provisions of the statute regulating the catching of salmon may be summarized as follows: The Governor, the Secretary of State, and State Treasurer constitute the board of fish commissioners, whose duty it is to appoint

Allegretto v. Oregon Automobile Insurance

140 Or. 538 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 30, 1932

Zimmerman v. … J., Brown and Campbell, JJ., concur.

Iwanicki v. State Industrial Accident Commission

104 Or. 650 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 18, 1922

Com. v. Brown, 92 Ohio, 309 ( 110 N. E. 744 , L. R. A. 1916B, 1277), Adams v. Acme Works, 182 Mich. 157 ( 148 N. W. 485 , Ann. Cas. 1916D, 689, L. R. A. 1916A, 283), and Steel v. Cammell, 2 K. B. 232 (2 Ann. Cas. 142). … L.; Bowen v. Emmerson, 3 Or. 452 ; King v. Boyd, 4 Or. 326 ; Evarts v. Steger, 5 Or. 149 ; Mack, v. Salem, 6 Or. 278 ; McKay v. Freeman, 6 Or. 449 ; State v. McKinnon, 8 Or. 487 ; Weissman v.

Adams v. Kulongoski

323 Or. 253 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 9, 1996

Hudson, 475 US 292 , 106 S Ct 1066 , 89 L Ed 2d 232 (1986), and Abood v. … Detroit Board of Education, 431 US 209, 222 , 97 S Ct 1782 , 52 L Ed 2d 261 (1977), in regard to collection from non-union employees of their share of union representation costs. See Elvin v.