Case law

Eivers v. Peard

100 Or. 197 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 12, 1921

Scott v. … Bean, Brown and Harris, JJ., concur.

Williams v. Pacific States Fire Ins. Co.

120 Or. 1 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 14, 1926

Co. v. Pearce, 39 Kan. 396 ( 18 Pac. 291 , 7 Am. St. Rep. 557 ); Rissler v. American Cent. Ins. Co., 150 Mo. 366 ( 51 S. W. 755 ); Bennett v. Agricultural Ins. Co., 106 N. Y. 243 ( 12 N. E. 609 ); Owens v. … J., and Brown and Belt, JJ., concur.

Frankland v. City of Lake Oswego

267 Or. 452 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 31, 1973

In Thompson v. … In Karoblis v.

Staub v. Jensen

180 Or. 682 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 5, 1947

In Tudor v. … That section has been construed by this court as follows: “* * * Section 33 in effect declares a decree of the court confirming a determination of the board to be conclusive as to claimants lawfully embraced in the determination

Gustin v. Gustin

79 Or. 387 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 29, 1916

She is corroborated in these particulars by the testimony of her uncle, Ernest V. Jensen, and by that of her sister, Mrs. Crum. … He complained to his wife about being compelled to furnish board and lodging for his sister-in-law and her child, whereupon the child was left at his home, while its mother secured employment at a hotel.

Skelton v. Newberg

76 Or. 126 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 27, 1915

Co. v. Hill, 9 Or. 377, 382 , Mr. … Cable Co. v. Southern Ry. Co. (C.

Schram v. Manary

123 Or. 354 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 30, 1927

BROWN, J. There is but little, if any, controversy concerning the facts in this case. That the labor was performed and the material furnished as alleged by Kelly and the lumber company is clearly .apparent. … Co. v. Rowand, 26 N. J. Eq. 389.

Phillips v. Perrin

253 Or. 540 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 19, 1969

Way et al v. Patton et al, 195 Or 36 , 241 P2d 895 (1952); Carpenters Union v. Backman, 160 Or 520, 528 , 86 P2d 456 (1939); Bradley v. … In Crocker et al v.

State v. Sholedice

364 Or. 146 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 13, 2018

See Illinois v. … As Justice Linde explained in State v.

Howell v. Howell

77 Or. 539 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 13, 1915

Howell and wife borrowed $1,500 from the board of commissioners for the sale of school and university lands and gave a mortgage on the Santiam farm to secure the note. … Pelton, 17 Or. 554 ( 21 Pac. 667 ); De Roboam v. Schmidtlin, 50 Or. 393 ( 92 Pac. 1082 ); Williamson v. Roberts, 70 Or. 126 ( 138 Pac. 840 , 140 Pac. 633 ); Chance v. Graham, 76 Or. 199 ( 148 Pac. 65 ).

Borden, Inc. v. Department of Revenue

286 Or. 567 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 12, 1979

Plaintiff, the owner of two chemical plants, one in Lane County and one in Union County, appealed fruitlessly to the Board of Equalization the assessed valuation assigned to its property, more particularly to the machinery … The taxpayer cites Publishers Paper Co. v. Dept. of Rev., 270 Or 737 , 530 P2d 88 (1974) and Reynolds Metals Company v.

Hughes v. Heppner Lumber Co.

205 Or. 11 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 29, 1955

Rayburn et ux. v. Crawford et ux., 187 Or 386, 398 , 211 P2d 483 . What is merchantable timber, in the absence of agreement, is a question of fact. We quote from Dahl et al. v. … We do not assume to enumerate all the elements involved in the term. * * *” Again, in Parsons v.

Kellaher v. City of Portland

57 Or. 575 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 10, 1911

State Land Board, 56 Or. 157 ( 108 Pac. 126 ) ; Chicago Ry. Co. v. Frary, 22 Ill. 34 ; Albany & Boston Min. Co. v. Auditor General, 37 Mich. 391 . 5. … Rep. 298 ); McCauley v. State, 83 Neb. 431 ( 119 N. W. 675 ) ; City of Brooklyn v. Breslin, 57 N. Y. 591 ) ; and it may except vehicles used for pleasure (City of Brooklyn v.

Breon v. Henkle

14 Or. 494 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 19, 1887

And the same rule is in effect stated in Tantum v. Tantum, 5 Ills. App. 598; Board of Trustees v. Misenheimer, 78 Ills. 22 ; St. Louis A. T. H. R. R. Co. v. Manley, 58 Ills. 300; Oxley v. … So in Bank v.

M & M Wood Working Co. v. State Industrial Accident Commission

176 Or. 35 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 6, 1944

Co. v. Ellis, 165 U. S. 150 ( 41 L. Ed. 666 , 17 Sup. Ct. Rep. 255); State v. Wright, 53 Or. 344 ( 100 Pac. 296 , 21 L. R. A. (N. S.) 349); Kellaher v. Portland, 57 Or. 575 -584 ( 112 Pac. 1076 ); State v. … III, § 1, of the Constitution of Oregon; Savage v. Martin, 161 Or. 660 , 91 P. (2d) 273 ; City of Portland v. Welch, 154 Or. 286 , 59 P. (2d) 228 , 106 A. L. R. 1188; Van Winkle v.

Jensen v. Medley

336 Or. 222 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 26, 2003

Northwest Natural Gas Co. v. … Ziegler, a vice president on International’s executive board, trained plaintiff to use International’s accounting software.

STATE EX REL. PACIFIC TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH CO. v. Duncan

191 Or. 475 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 25, 1951

The complaint (telephone company v. … Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commrs., 276 Fed. 979 , gives an excellent delineation of the rule under discussion: “On this showing the question is, shall a preliminary injunction issue?

State Highway Commission v. Heintz Construction Co.

245 Or. 530 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 1, 1967

Courtney v. … Examples are the presumption that district boundary board posted election notices: School District No. 17 v.

Joseph v. Utah Home Fire Insurance

313 Or. 323 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 18, 1992

See Mullart v. … See Shadbolt v. Farmers Insur.

State v. Wakefield

111 Or. 615 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 22, 1924

Justice Brown in State v. Stevenson, 98 Or. 285 ( 193 Pac. 1030 ), followed the ruling of the Supreme Court of the State of Iowa. … This instruction clearly states the law: State v Scott, 28 Or. 331, 335 ( 42 Pac. 1 ); State v. Case, 61 Or. 265 ( 122 Pac. 304 ); *625 State v. Jarvis, 18 Or. 360 ( 23 Pac. 251 ); State v.