Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersor

8,515 results

0.36s

  • Silsby v. Strong

    38 Or. 36 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 12, 1900

    Brown as a witness, who testified that he was a member of the board of trustees of the Elmer-Brown Copper Mining & Smelting Company, and produced *39 the minutes of the first meeting of the stockholders and of the board of … It is insisted that the board meeting which authorized the execution of the deed was illegal, because R. A. Brown was not personally present thereat, leaving the board without a quorum to transact business.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Board of Trustees v. Oregon Consistory No. 1

    103 Or. 621 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 25, 1922

    persons, constituting a board called the Board of School Trustees, to the corporation known as the Board of School Trustees. … By the recitals written in the deed signed by Bishop Morris, he and those in privity with him are estopped from denying that he possessed an estate more restricted than the one recited: Bayley v. McCoy, 8 Or. 262 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • North Pacific Presbyterian Board of Missions v. Ah Won

    18 Or. 339 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 13, 1890

    This provision we considered in Mitchell v Powers, 16 Or. 492 , and in the same case in 17 Or. 492 , as conferring jurisdiction upon said court to revise al final decisions of the circuit courts. … They found the children in a Chinese brothel, where , they were allowed to remain by their ardent and disinterested friends until the Woman’s North Pacific Presbyterian Board of Missions took action to rescue them and put

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Holmes

    290 Or. 173 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 2, 1980

    The Trial Board, one member dissenting, found the Accused not guilty of both charges. The Disciplinary Review Board disagreed. It found the Accused guilty of both charges and recommended that he be reprimanded. … Both the Trial Board and the Disciplinary Review Board found the Accused not guilty of that charge.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • State Land Board v. Western-Pacific Dredging Corp.

    244 Or. 184 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 14, 1966

    Co. v. State Tax Com., 1937, 156 Or 505, 511 , 62 P2d 7 . The proceeds derived from any use of the lands became a part of the Common School Fund. ORS 274.600 (3). … We have examined the decision in Bostick v. Smoot Sand & Gravel Corporation, (CCA 4th, 1958) 260 F2d 534. To the extent that the case is analogous to the one at hand, we cannot agree with it.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Weiss v. Board of County Commissioners of Jackson County

    8 Or. 529 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1880

    (Lewis v. Lewis, 4 Or. 210 .) The objections to the undertaking are, however, well taken. The service of the notice must precede the filing of the undertaking for an appeal. (Dooling v. Moore, 19 Cal. 81 ; Buckholder v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Forelaws On Board v. Energy Facility Siting Council

    307 Or. 327 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 31, 1989

    Forelaws on Board v. Energy Facility Siting Coun., 84 Or App 433 , 734 P2d 370 (1987). The merits of that court’s decision are not before us. … Forelaws on Board v. Energy Fac. Siting Council, 303 Or 541 , 738 P2d 973 (1987). It follows that the Court of Appeals never had jurisdiction in this matter.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Makinson v. Board of Directors, School District No. 4

    209 Or. 232 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 31, 1956

    Seufert v. Stadelman, 178 Or 646 , 167 P2d 936 ; United States of America v. Cohn, 201 Or 680 , 272 P2d 982 ; State ex rel. Bethke v. Bain, 193 Or 688 , 240 P2d 958 . … Funston v. District School Board, etc., 130 Or 82 , 278 P 1075 .

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Shelby v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION

    351 Or. 507 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 29, 2011

    272 P.3d 742 (2011) 351 Or. 507 SHELBY v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION. No. (S059847). Supreme Court of Oregon. December 29, 2011. Petition for Review Denied.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Sabin v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION

    348 Or. 414 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 11, 2010

    233 P.3d 817 (2010) 348 Or. 414 SABIN v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION. (S058305). Supreme Court of Oregon. June 11, 2010. Petition for Review Denied.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Hendricks v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION

    350 Or. 571 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 28, 2011

    258 P.3d 526 (2011) 350 Or. 571 HENDRICKS v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION. (S059489). Supreme Court of Oregon. July 28, 2011. Petition for Review Denied.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • McIntyre v. Kamm

    12 Or. 253 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 4, 1885

    (Ja ckson v. Livingston, 6 Johns. 149; Jackson v. Osborn, *259 2 Wend. 555 ; Bradstreet v. Clarke, 12 Wend. 673 ; Norman v. Wells, 17 Wend. 137 ; Van Cortlandt v. Tozer, 17 Wend. 338 ; Carver v. Jackson, 4 Peters, 82 .) … As this was not done, it was error to admit the deed on the Woods’ certificate alone, and direct a verdict for the defendants as to said lot. *260 The description in the deed from Sarah Brown to William Stevens was sufficient

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Roberts v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION

    350 Or. 241 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 21, 2011

    254 P.3d 743 (2011) 350 Or. 241 ROBERTS v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION. (S059225). Supreme Court of Oregon. April 21, 2011. Petition for Review Denied.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Walton v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION

    349 Or. 654 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 17, 2011

    249 P.3d 542 (2011) 349 Or. 654 WALTON v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION. (S059006). Supreme Court of Oregon. February 17, 2011. Petition for Review Allowed.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Martinez v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION

    349 Or. 602 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 3, 2011

    249 P.3d 123 (2011) 349 Or. 602 MARTINEZ v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION. (S057876). Supreme Court of Oregon. February 3, 2011. Petition for review allowed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Baize v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION

    351 Or. 507 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 29, 2011

    272 P.3d 742 (2011) 351 Or. 507 BAIZE v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION. No. (S059825). Supreme Court of Oregon. December 29, 2011. Petition for Review Denied.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Murphy v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION

    351 Or. 545 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 2, 2012

    274 P.3d 184 (2012) 351 Or. 545 MURPHY v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION. No. (S059788). Supreme Court of Oregon. February 2, 2012. Petition for Review Denied.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Smith v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION

    350 Or. 241 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 21, 2011

    254 P.3d 743 (2011) 350 Or. 241 SMITH v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION. (S059247). Supreme Court of Oregon. April 21, 2011. Petition for Review Denied.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Baker v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION

    351 Or. 401 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 1, 2011

    268 P.3d 152 (2011) 351 Or. 401 BAKER v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION. No. (S059750). Supreme Court of Oregon. December 1, 2011. Petition for review denied.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Richins v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION

    348 Or. 621 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 29, 2010

    237 P.3d 221 (2010) 348 Or. 621 RICHINS v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION. (S058415). Supreme Court of Oregon. July 29, 2010. Petition for Review Denied.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.