Case law

Civil Service Board v. Bureau of Labor & Industries

298 Or. 307 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 11, 1984

Matter of Civil Service Board of Portland, supra at 17. … In McPherson v.

City of La Grande v. Public Employes Retirement Board

284 Or. 173 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 25, 1978

See Rose v. Port of Portland, 82 Or at 573 ; Wasco County P.U.D. v. … Thus Kidd v.

Leavitt v. Stamp

134 Or. 191 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 13, 1930

In Brown v. … J., and Brown, J., concur. Belt, J., concurs in the result.

Browder v. BOARD OF PAROLE & POST-PRISON SUPERVISION

343 Or. 222 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 4, 2007

168 P.3d 1153 (2007) BROWDER v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION No. S53551. Supreme Court of Oregon. October 4, 2007. Petition for review allowed.

Springfield Utility Board v. Emerald People's Utility District

339 Or. 631 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 30, 2005

See PGE v. … In Wasco County P.U.D. v.

Board of Railroad Commissioners v. Oregon Railway & Navigation Co.

17 Or. 65 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 5, 1888

cognizance, or what would be a lawful order or requirement of the board; nor does any section of it indicate what law the board has cognizance of. … Under this view, the board would be the most important tribunal in the state.

Hibbard v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

327 Or. 594 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 22, 1998

The order of the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision is vacated. The case is remanded to the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision for further consideration in light of Noble v. … Board of Parole, 327 Or 485 , 964 P2d 990 (1998).

Board of School Trustees v. Morrison

105 Or. 629 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 21, 1922

If he did this, the board had no reason to complain: 14 C. J., § 1887; Cook on Corporations, § 652; Jameson v. Coldwell, 23 Or. 144 ( 31 Pac. 279 ); Stanley v. Luse, 36 Or. 25 ( 58 Pac. 75 ); Gam *641 ble v. … A. 527); Barr v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co., 57 Fed. 86 ( 6 C. C. A. 260 ); Figge v. Bergenthal, 130 Wis. 594 ( 109 N. W. 581 , 110 N. W. 798 ); Stetson v. Northern Inv. Co., 104 Iowa, 393 ( 73 N. W. 869 ); Battelle v.

James & Yost, Inc. v. State Board of Higher Education

216 Or. 598 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 10, 1959

Schrader v. Veatch, et al., 216 Or 105 , 337 P2d 814 ; Lucas v. Banfield et al., 180 Or 437 , 177 P2d 244 ; United Contracting Co. v. Duby, 134 Or 1 , 292 P 309 ; Mohler et ux. v. … It has such powers and duties only as the state entrusts to the Board and these powers and duties are set forth by statutory *601 enactment. McClain v. Regents of the University, 124 Or 629 , 265 P 412 .

Engweiler v. Oregon Board of Parole (Certified Question)

Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 21, 2006

MISCELLANEOUS SUPREME COURT DISPOSITIONS CERTIFIED QUESTIONS, CERTIFIED APPEALS, MANDAMUS PROCEEDINGS, AND OTHER MATTERS November 21, 2006 Engweiler, Conrad v. … Oregon Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision / White, Lydell M. v. Lampert / White, Laycelle T. v. Czerniak (S54153). Certified questions accepted.

Perez v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

327 Or. 595 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 22, 1998

The order of the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision is vacated. The case is remanded to the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision for further consideration in light of Noble v. … Board of Parole, 327 Or 485 , 964 P2d 990 (1998).

DeCosta v. State Board of Parole

288 Or. 515 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 29, 1980

*517 MEMORANDUM OPINION The Court of Appeals allowed respondent’s motion to dismiss this case based upon the previous decision by that Court in Harris v. … Board of Parole, 39 Or App 913 , 593 P2d 1292 (1979), a similar case. Since then this Court has reversed the decision of that Court in Harris and remanded that case to it. 288 Or 495 , 605 P2d 1181 (1980).

Garratt v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

327 Or. 596 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 22, 1998

The order of the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision is vacated. The case is remanded to the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision for further consideration in light of Noble v. … Board of Parole, 327 Or 485 , 964 P2d 990 (1998).

Citizens' National Bank v. Baker County Board of Equalization

109 Or. 669 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 22, 1924

A hearing was had before the county board of equalization upon the petition of the bank, after which the board disallowed the petition. … In the case of Valley Investment Co. v. Board, 152 Iowa, 84 ( 131 N. W. 669), the Supreme Court of Iowa placed a construction upon analogous statutes of that state like that adopted by the Connecticut court.

Oregon Environmental Council v. Oregon State Board of Education

307 Or. 30 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 30, 1988

Pharmacy Bd. v. Va. … price of prescription drugs); see also Board of Education v.

Fleming v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION

346 Or. 361 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 17, 2009

211 P.3d 930 (2009) 346 Or. 361 FLEMING v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION. (S057245). Supreme Court of Oregon. June 17, 2009. Petition for review allowed.

State Ex Rel. Board of Bar Examiners v. Poyntz

152 Or. 592 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 26, 1935

No hearing was had, however, by the State Board of Bar Examiners and the petitioner had no opportunity to meet his accusers face to face to refute any charges which might be made against him, although he urged the board to … In fairness to the board, let it be said that no statutory procedure for such hearing was provided.

Severy v. Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision

347 Or. 42 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 17, 2009

217 P.3d 688 (2009) 347 Or. 42 SEVERY v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION. (S057516). Supreme Court of Oregon. September 17, 2009. Petition for review allowed.

State Land Board v. United States National Bank

213 Or. 368 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 19, 1958

When the estate was previously before us (In the *370 Matter of the Estate of Peter Lappy, Deceased, State Land Board v. … and that the State Land Board of the State of Oregon claims an escheat in this estate.

Silsby v. Strong

38 Or. 36 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 12, 1900

Brown as a witness, who testified that he was a member of the board of trustees of the Elmer-Brown Copper Mining & Smelting Company, and produced *39 the minutes of the first meeting of the stockholders and of the board of … It is insisted that the board meeting which authorized the execution of the deed was illegal, because R. A. Brown was not personally present thereat, leaving the board without a quorum to transact business.