Case law

Lasalle v. Board of Parole

303 Or. 665 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 4, 1987

For the reasons expressed in my dissenting opinion in Anderson v. … Board of Parole, 303 Or 618, 632 , 740 P2d 760, 769 (1987), I respectfully dissent from that portion of this opinion dealing with a “detailed explanation,” under ORS 144.135, of the action taken by the Board of Parole with

Moore v. Board of Parole

303 Or. 668 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 4, 1987

At petitioner’s prison term hearing, the Board of Parole (Board) had previously established a history/risk score of 4, crime category 6 with a matrix range of 74 to 100 months and set petitioner at 92 months with a release … Petitioner seeks review, alleging that the Board failed to satisfy the requirements of ORS 144.135. Petitioner’s procedural contentions are answered in Anderson v. Board of Parole, 303 Or 618 , 740 P2d 760 (1987).

Brush v. State Board of Higher Education

245 Or. 373 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 30, 1966

. *375 Our decision here is controlled by Baggett v. Bullitt, 377 US 360 , 84 S Ct 1316 , 12 L ed 2d 377 (1964). … West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette, 319 US 624 , 87 L ed 1628, 63 S Ct 1178 , 147 ALR 674 .

Morgan v. Board of Forestry

250 Or. 460 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 26, 1969

Early in 1942, prior to the completion of the foreclosure proceeding, the Board of Forestry acquired from Polk County a deed to an undivided three quarter interest in the disputed property, making the Board a tenant in common … See also Deardorff v. Hood River County, 84 Or Adv Sh 175, 246 Or 7 , 423 P2d 952 (1967); Evergreen Timber v. Hood River Co., 84 Or Adv Sh 205, 246 Or 11 , 423 P2d 963 (1967); Johnson v.

Smith v. Board of Parole

313 Or. 342 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 18, 1992

The case is remanded to the Board of Parole for further proceedings. Jenkins v. Board of Parole, 313 Or 234 , 833 P2d 1268 (1992).

Weldon v. Board of Licensed Professional Counselors & Therapists

353 Or. 85 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 20, 2012

State v. … Blair v.

Thomas v. Board of Parole

305 Or. 46 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 9, 1988

*47 MEMORANDUM OPINION Petitioner, a prisoner, complains that in setting his parole release date the Board of Parole (Board) improperly failed to consider a mitigating circumstance. … The Board Action Form (BAF), which this court explained in detail in the case of Anderson v.

Seaunier v. Board of Parole

303 Or. 677 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 4, 1987

At petitioner’s prison term hearing, the Board established a history/risk score of 3 under crime category 6 with a matrix range of 60 to 80 months, but sustained the 60-month minimum, affirming the previous parole release … Petitioner seeks review, alleging the same grounds as in Anderson v. Board of Parole, 303 Or 618 , 740 P2d 760 (1987). Petitioner’s procedural contentions are answered in Anderson v. Board of Parole, supra.

Schmidt v. Board of Parole

303 Or. 673 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 4, 1987

The Board shall then set an initial parole release date in accordance with rule 255-35-013.” As we said in Anderson v. … Anderson v. Board of Parole, supra. The decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.

Hines v. Board of Parole

303 Or. 662 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 4, 1987

For the reasons expressed in my dissenting opinion in Anderson v. … Board of Parole, 303 Or 618, 632 , 740 P2d 760, 769 (1987), I respectfully dissent from that portion of this opinion dealing with a “detailed explanation,” under ORS 144.135, of the action taken by the Board of Parole with

Quintero v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

329 Or. 319 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 8, 1999

In its order of dismissal, the court cited its own intervening decision in Luckey v. Board of Parole, 150 Or App 480 , 946 P2d 361 (1997). … It is for this court, not the Board’s legal representatives, to determine what the legislature intended when it enacted ORS 144.335(3). See Lincoln Loan Co. v.

Reese v. Board of Parole

303 Or. 692 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 4, 1987

At petitioner’s prison term hearing, the Board of Parole (Board) established a history/risk score of 6, and crime category 7, bringing petitioner within a matrix range of 168 to 228 months, but continued the matter to clarify … Petitioner seeks review, alleging that the Board failed to satisfy the requirements of ORS 144.135. Petitioner’s procedural contentions are answered in Anderson v. Board of Parole, 303 Or 618 , 740 P2d 760 (1987).

Pilgrim v. Board of Parole

303 Or. 689 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 4, 1987

Petitioner seeks review, alleging that the Board failed to satisfy the requirements of ORS 144.135 and to consider certain factors in mitigation. Petitioner’s procedural contentions are answered in Anderson v. … Board of Parole, 303 Or 618 , 740 P2d 760 (1987).

Noble v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

327 Or. 485 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 11, 1998

Fuentes v. … v.

Boise Cascade Corp. v. Board of Forestry

344 Or. 390 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 26, 2008

181 P.3d 769 (2008) 344 Or. 390 BOISE CASCADE CORP. v. BOARD OF FORESTRY. No. S055621. Supreme Court of Oregon. March 26, 2008. Petition for review denied.

Taylor v. Board of Parole

313 Or. 344 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 18, 1992

The case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further consideration in light of Jenkins v. Board of Parole, 313 Or 234 , 833 P2d 1268 (1992).

Welch v. Board of Parole

313 Or. 343 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 18, 1992

The case is remanded to the Board of Parole for further proceedings. Jenkins v. Board of Parole, 313 Or 234 , 833 P2d 1268 (1992).

Blacknall v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

348 Or. 131 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 8, 2010

Blacknall v. Board of Parole, 221 Or App 200 , 189 P3d 1234 (2008). … Board of Parole, 332 Or 266 , 27 P3d 110 (2001) and Atkinson v. Board of Parole, 341 Or 382 , 143 P3d 538 (2006). See Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v.

Zahos v. Board of Parole

303 Or. 695 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 4, 1987

Petitioner seeks review, alleging that the Board failed to satisfy the requirements of ORS 144.135 and failed to consider certain factors in mitigation. Petitioner’s procedural contentions are answered in Anderson v. … Board of Parole, 303 Or 618 , 740 P2d 760 (1987). Petitioner also claims that “[t]he record reflects the Board failed to consider a number of mitigating circumstances.”

State Board of Higher Education v. Stewart

236 Or. 386 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 31, 1963

The State Board of Higher Education brought an action to condemn certain real property consisting of land and building which defendants Stewart and Christianson were purchasing under a contract from defendants Moore.