Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
8,515 results
8.44s
Board of Medical Examiners v. Buck
200 Or. 488 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 24, 1954
State v. Ju Nun, 53 Or 1 , 97 P 96 , 98 P 513 ; Drainage Dist. No. 7 v. Bernards, 89 Or 531 , 174 P 1167 ; State v. Moore, 192 Or 39 , 233 P2d 253 ; 50 Am Jur, Statutes, § 530, p 536, § 552, p 556. … After the ease had been remanded to the circuit court pursuant to our opinion in Board of Medical Examiners v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedMohr v. State Board of Education
236 Or. 398 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 22, 1964
The decree of the lower court is reversed. ① In School District No. 7 v. … In the case at bar, although the board is made up of appointed rather than elected officials, the inference referred to in School District No. 7 v.
Cited 6 timesPublished241 Or. 442 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 13, 1965
Highway Com. v. Helliwell, 225 Or 588 , 358 P2d 719 . The record of the probate proceedings is before us as an exhibit on appeal. … The pertinent provisions of OES 120.130 'have been interpreted in Engle v. State Land Board, 164 Or 109 , 99 P2d 1018 .
Cited 1 timesPublishedMenzl v. Psychiatric Security Review Board
325 Or. 159 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 27, 1997
The order of the Psychiatric Security Review Board is vacated, and the case is remanded to the Board for reconsideration. 1 The DSM is a publication of the American Psychiatric Association that categorizes mental disorders … Axis I consists of clinical syndromes and V Codes. V Codes are conditions not attributable to a mental disorder that are a focus of attention or treatment.
Cited 2 timesPublishedStrunk v. Public Employees Retirement Board
343 Or. 226 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 11, 2007
Salem, Deschutes County, the League of Oregon Cities, and the Oregon School Boards Association. … See Kahn v.
Cited 11 timesPublishedLlewellyn v. Board of Chiropractic Examiners
318 Or. 120 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 9, 1993
Petitioner seeks review of a Court of Appeals’ decision affirming an order of the State Board of Chiropractic Examiners (Board) that revoked petitioner’s chiropractic license. ORS 684.100. 1 Llewellyn v. … He would have remanded the case to the Board for a new hearing. Llewellyn v. Board of Chiropractic Examiners, supra, 119 Or App at 404-05 (Rossman, P. J., dissenting). 9 Larry D.
Cited 8 timesPublishedNorden v. STATE, WATER RESOURCES DEPT.
329 Or. 641 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 17, 2000
See Erck v. Brown Oldsmobile, 311 Or 519, 528 , 815 P2d 1251 (1991) (substantial evidence standard of review in APA does not require reviewing court to “explain away” conflicting evidence). … Fitzstephens v.
Cited 41 timesPublishedNakashima v. Oregon State Board of Education
344 Or. 497 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 8, 2008
See Joshi v. … Dist. v.
Cited 15 timesPublishedRuonala v. Board of County Commissioners
212 Or. 309 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 31, 1957
Pratt v. … Unless there is a clear abuse of discretion in that regard, we may not interfere with the province of the board by means of mandamus or otherwise. Mann v. Tracy, 185 Cal. 272 , 196 P. 484 .’ Otto v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedSmith v. State Board of Parole
297 Or. 184 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 30, 1984
We conclude that the Board erred, reverse the Court of Appeals and remand the case to the Board of Parole for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. … Accordingly, we remand this case to the Board of Parole for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. Reversed and remanded to the Board of Parole.
Cited 2 timesPublishedJefferson County School District No. 509-J v. Fair Dismissal Appeals Board
311 Or. 389 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 30, 1991
Thus, “so long as the facts justify the grounds cited for dismissal, [FDAB] may engage in only deferential review of the school board’s judgment concerning the dismissal sanction.” Ross v. … No. 509-J v.
Cited 18 timesPublishedFuller v. BOARD OF TAX PRACTITIONERS
343 Or. 223 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 4, 2007
168 P.3d 1154 (2007) FULLER v. BOARD OF TAX PRACTITIONERS No. S55197. Supreme Court of Oregon. October 4, 2007. Petition for review denied.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBarclay v. State Board of Education
244 Or. 294 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 9, 1966
School Dist. 7 v. Weissenfluh, 1963, 236 Or 165, 172 , 387 P2d 567 . In no event could the allegation of the petition establish arbitrary action by the Board. In Nicklaus v. … School Dist. 7 v. Weissenfluh, supra, 236 Or at 171 ; Mohr v. State Board of Education, 1964, 236 Or 398 , 388 P2d 463 .
Cited 3 timesPublishedWilson v. State Board of Parole
304 Or. 480 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1987
State v. Wilson, 35 Or App 181 , 581 P2d 106 (1978). This court denied review. The Court of Appeals’ opinion in part said: “Defendant’s second assignment concerns his sentence. … The balance of the record is made up of documents reciting actions taken by the Board. For the most part these documents are “Board Action Forms” (BAF). See Anderson v. Board of Parole, 303 Or 618 , 740 P2d 760 (1987).
Cited 1 timesPublishedBoard of Medical Examiners v. Cusick
234 Or. 533 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 19, 1963
Defendant filed his application with the board. On October 6, 1960 he appeared before the board and requested reinstatement. … pleadings filed by the board.
Cited 1 timesPublishedCity of Hermiston v. Employment Relations Board
280 Or. 291 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 1, 1977
It appears that the Court of Appeals overlooked its own prior conclusion on the identical point in Klamath County v. Laborers Inter. … See 29 USC §160 (e), (f); American Fed. of Labor v.
Cited 37 timesPublishedMcGowan v. Psychiatric Security Review Board
324 Or. 17 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 8, 1996
The case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further consideration in the light of Drew v. PSRB, 322 Or 491 , 909 P2d 211 (1996).
Cited 1 timesPublished244 Or. 229 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 27, 1966
In Ljubich v. … In addition, Santovincenzo v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedAngelos v. State Board of Dental Examiners
244 Or. 1 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 18, 1966
Semler v. Oregon Dental Examiners, 148 Or 50 , 34 P2d 311 (1934), affirmed 294 US 608 , 55 S Ct 570 , 79 L Ed 1086 (1935). … We believe that the legislative grant of authority is clear in the case at bar, and that it was within the power of the Board to promulgate the rule which is here under attack. See Phelps Dodge Corp. v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedWard v. Oregon State Board of Nursing
266 Or. 128 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 1, 1973
Thus in Lamb v. … Reversed. ① Cf., Board, of Medical Examiners v. Mintz, 233 Or 441 , 378 P2d 945 (1963).
Cited 19 timesPublished
Ask Donna