Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersor

8,515 results

0.59s

  • Brumnett v. Psychiatric Security Review Board

    315 Or. 402 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 19, 1993

    He was committed to the jurisdiction of the Psychiatric Security Review Board (PSRB) for 25 years. … Brumnett v. Psychiatric Security Review Board, 106 Or App 182 , 807 P2d 347 (1991). This court allowed review.

    Cited 193 timesPublished
  • Gehring v. Board of Parole

    342 Or. 416 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 21, 2007

    154 P.3d 722 (2007) 342 Or. 416 GEHRING v. BOARD OF PAROLE and Post-Prison Supervision. S54399. Supreme Court of Oregon. February 21, 2007. Petition for review denied.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Singleton v. Board of Parole

    342 Or. 416 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 21, 2007

    154 P.3d 722 (2007) 342 Or. 416 SINGLETON v. BOARD OF PAROLE and Post-Prison Supervision. S54436. Supreme Court of Oregon. February 21, 2007. Petition for review denied.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Alexanderson v. Board of Commissioners

    290 Or. 137 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 4, 1980

    See Alexanderson v. Polk County Commissioners, 289 Or 427 , 616 P2d 459 (1980).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Drew v. Psychiatric Security Review Board

    322 Or. 491 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 1, 1996

    Drew v. Psychiatric Security Review Board, 127 Or App 753 , 875 P2d 546 (1994). … Rolfe v. Psychiatric Security Review Board, 53 Or App 941, 951 , 633 P2d 846 , rev den 292 Or 334 (1981). We agree with that statement and adopt it as our own.

    Cited 92 timesPublished
  • Nakashima v. BOARD OF EDUC.

    342 Or. 116 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 5, 2006

    149 P.3d 138 (2006) 342 Or. 116 NAKASHIMA v. BOARD OF EDUC. No. S53972. Oregon Supreme Court. December 5, 2006 Petition for review allowed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Baker v. Board of Parole

    303 Or. 656 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 4, 1987

    The Board voted to sustain the minimum sentence and set a one-year period of supervision on parole because of the nature of the offense. The Board is not required to state further details for its decision. Anderson V. … Board of Parole, 303 Or 618 , 740 P2d 760 (1987). This petitioner’s other complaint is that the Board failed to consider a factor in mitigation.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brogoitti Et Ux v. Brown Et Ux

    231 Or. 309 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 27, 1962

    Sterling v. … Randell v. Randell, 4 Cal.2d 575 , 50 P2d 806 .” In Morris v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Castillo v. Board of Parole

    338 Or. 680 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 6, 2005

    115 P.3d 245 (2005) 338 Or. 680 CASTILLO v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION. No. S51823. Supreme Court of Oregon. July 6, 2005. Petition for review allowed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Fisher v. Board of Parole

    338 Or. 374 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 5, 2005

    110 P.3d 113 (2005) 338 Or. 374 FISHER v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION No. S52046. Supreme Court of Oregon. April 5, 2005 Petition for review denied.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State Land Board v. United States

    222 Or. 40 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 18, 1960

    S. v. Gallagher, 97 F Sup 1014, 1015 (SD Cal 1951); U. S. v. Brown, 110 F Sup 370, 372 (SD Cal 1952); U. S. v. Peoples Nat. Bank of Chicago, 121 F Sup 331, 332 (ND Ill 1953); U. S. v. The Mid City Nat. … Dexter v. Hall, supra (21 L.ed at 77). In coming to his conclusion in U. S. v.

    Reversed on other grounds by United States v. Oregon, 366 U.S. 643 (1961)Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Robinson v. Public Employees Retirement Board

    351 Or. 404 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 30, 2011

    Arken v. 4 City of Portland, 351 Or 113, ___ P3d ___ (2011). … We allow petitioners' request for reconsideration, but adhere 12 to our previous opinion. 13 In Strunk v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Osborn v. Psychiatric Security Review Board

    325 Or. 135 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 27, 1997

    Relying on Hillman v. North. Wasco Co. PUD, 213 Or 264 , 323 P2d 664 (1958), overruled on other grounds by Maulding v. … Axis I consists of clinical syndromes and V Codes. For a definition of “V Codes,” see note 13, below. Axis II consists of developmental disorders and personality disorders.

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • Bay v. State Board of Education

    233 Or. 601 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 30, 1963

    Richardson v. Neuner, 183 Or 558, 564 , 194 P2d 989 . … Leverich v. Frank, 6 Or 212 ; State v. Sing, 114 Or 267 , 229 P 921 .

    Cited 42 timesPublished
  • Board of Medical Examiners v. Mintz

    233 Or. 441 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 20, 1963

    Blanchard, 138 Ark 137 , 211 SW 375 , 5 ALR 84 (1919); Hyatt v. Williams, 148 Cal 585, 84 P 41 (1906); Matthews v. Murphy, 23 Ky L Rep 750, 63 SW 785 (1901); Czarra v. … Board of Medical Ex-Supervisors, 25 App D C 443 (1905). ⑦ Warren v. Marion County, 222 Or 307 , 353 P2d 257 (1960).

    Cited 42 timesPublished
  • Jenkins v. Board of Parole

    Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 18, 2014

    In Dawson/Fletcher v. … Similarly, in Baker v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Funston v. District School Board, Etc.

    130 Or. 82 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 4, 1929

    Such programs are instituted by the board, and it would be an anomaly for them to sit as judges upon the merits of causes of dismissal which they created. The case of Venable v. … Board of Police Commrs., supra, decided by this court, is an authority against plaintiff’s contentions. From Kenny v. Kane, 27 Misc. Rep. 680 ( 59 N. Y.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Mueller v. Psychiatric Security Review Board

    325 Or. 332 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 30, 1997

    The order of the Psychiatric Security Review Board is vacated, and the case is remanded to the Board for reconsideration. … Petitioner’s diagnosis does not include any V Codes. The other two axes are Axis IV, Severity of Psychosocial Stressors, and Axis V, Highest Level of Adaptive Functioning Past Year.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Hanson v. Psychiatric Security Review Board

    331 Or. 626 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 1, 2001

    Id. at 150 ; see also Rios v. PSRB, 325 Or 151 , 934 P2d 399 (1997) (same result in similar circumstances). … See generally Mueller v.

    Reversed — as noted by 2 later courtsCited 10 timesPublished
  • Esperum v. Oregon Board of Parole

    296 Or. 789 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 17, 1984

    Hein v. Board of Parole, 56 Or App 293 , 641 P2d 642 (1982). In Hein , the court stated: “The Board contends that such a holding would ‘nullify’ our decision in Cruz v. … review. 3 Matteson v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.