Case law

GTE Northwest Inc. v. Public Utility Commission

321 Or. 458 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 24, 1995

Nollan v. … See Dept. of Trans. v.

Sehlbrede v. State Land Board

46 Or. 615 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 24, 1905

State Land Board has authority,.by virtue of its power to make rules and regulations for the transaction of its business, etc., to act for and bind the State by such waiver: Miller v. … The full and complete. discussion of the question in the recent case of Maffet v. Oregon & Cal. R. Co. 46 Or. 443 ( 80 Pac. 489 ), renders needless its further consideration at this time. 3.

Coffey v. BOARD OF GEOLOGIST EXAMINERS

347 Or. 317 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 5, 2009

221 P.3d 748 (2009) 347 Or. 317 COFFEY v. BOARD OF GEOLOGIST EXAMINERS. No. (S057511). Supreme Court of Oregon. November 5, 2009. Petition for Review Allowed.

Tharp v. Psychiatric Security Review Board

338 Or. 413 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 14, 2005

Accordingly, the board asserted that, as this court held in Einstein v. … affirmed the board’s order, citing two cases, Rios v.

Wester v. State Land Board

231 Or. 405 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 6, 1962

Dean v. First Nat’l Bank, 217 Or 340, 375 , 341 P2d 512 (1959); Pioneer Trust Co. v. Thielsen, 199 Or 206, 214 , 258 P2d 788 (1953); Heimbigner v. U. S. Natl. Bank, 190 Or 592, 597 , 227 P2d 827 (1951); Schramm v. U. S. … Rowe v. Rowe, 219 Or 599, 608 , 347 P2d 968 (1959); Heimbigner v. U. S. Natl. Bank, supra, 190 Or at 596 , 227 P2d 827 (1951); Miller v. Smith, 179 Or 214, 219 , 170 P2d 583 (1946); Hansem v.

Howard v. Board of Parole

345 Or. 417 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 26, 2008

198 P.3d 941 (2008) 345 Or. 417 HOWARD v. BOARD OF PAROLE. No. (S056612). Supreme Court of Oregon. November 26, 2008. Petition for review denied.

Fields v. Workmen's Compensation Board

276 Or. 805 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 26, 1976

Petitioner seeks a review of the decision of the Court of Appeals in Fields v. Workmen’s Compensation Board, 26 Or App 323 , 552 P2d 834 (1976). … Petitioner contends that the Court of Appeals erred in holding that the Workmen’s Compensation Board had no jurisdiction under ORS 656.278(1) to reconsider a claim which was initially determined to be noncompensable and where

State Land Board v. Schroetlin

161 Or. 146 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 28, 1939

v. … In State Land Board v.

Coffey v. BOARD OF GEOLOGIST EXAMINERS

348 Or. 494 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 9, 2010

See Meltebeke v. … In PGE v.

Woodroffe v. Board of Parole

343 Or. 206 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 14, 2007

166 P.3d 535 (2007) 343 Or. 206 WOODROFFE v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION. No. S55075. Supreme Court of Oregon. August 14, 2007. Petition for review denied.

Hemmerich v. Board of Parole

303 Or. 683 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 4, 1987

PER CURIAM Petitioner seeks review, alleging that the Board of Parole (Board) failed to satisfy the requirements of ORS 144.135. As in Anderson v. … Board of Parole, 303 Or 618 , 740 P2d 760 (1987), the Board fully complied with ORS 144.135 by setting forth “in writing the detailed bases for its decision,” which included four aggravation factors as justifying its decision

Freeman v. BOARD OF INVESTIGATORS

341 Or. 197 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 18, 2006

140 P.3d 580 (2006) 341 Or. 197 FREEMAN v. BOARD OF INVESTIGATORS. No. S53559. OREGON SUPREME COURT. July 18, 2006. Petition for review denied.

Strunk v. Public Employees Retirement Board

338 Or. 145 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 8, 2005

Brown v. Oregon State Bar, 293 Or 446, 449 , 648 P2d 1289 (1982); see also State ex rel v. … See generally PGE v.

Guzman v. Board of Parole

340 Or. 34 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 24, 2006

129 P.3d 183 (2006) 340 Or. 34 GUZMAN v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION. No. S52900. Supreme Court of Oregon. January 24, 2006. Petition for Review Allowed.

Jenkins v. Board of Parole

340 Or. 34 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 24, 2006

129 P.3d 183 (2006) 340 Or. 34 JENKINS v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION. No. S52963. Supreme Court of Oregon. January 24, 2006. Petition for Review Allowed.

MENDACINO v. Board of Parole

342 Or. 416 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 21, 2007

154 P.3d 722 (2007) 342 Or. 416 MENDACINO v. BOARD OF PAROLE and Post-Prison Supervision. S54304. Supreme Court of Oregon. February 21, 2007. Petition for review denied.

Gomez v. Board of Parole

341 Or. 579 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 31, 2006

146 P.3d 884 (2006) 341 Or. 579 Gomez v. Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (S54076). Supreme Court of Oregon. October 31, 2006. Petition for Review Denied.

Brown v. Westfal-Larsen & Co.

235 Or. 64 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1963

Gutierrez v. Waterman Steamship Corp., 83 S Ct 1185 , 10 L Ed2d 297 (1963). … Michalic v. Cleveland Tankers, Inc., 364 US 325 , 81 S Ct 6 , 5 L Ed2d 20 (1960); Mahnich v. Southern S. S. Co., 321 US 96, 103 , 64 S Ct 455 , 88 L Ed 561 (1944).

Brown v. Department of Revenue

308 Or. 111 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 13, 1989

Brown v. Dept. of Rev., 11 OTR 61 (1988). On de novo review, ORS 305.445, ORS 19.125(2), we affirm. We summarize the facts detailed in the Tax Court’s opinion. … Brown v. Dept. of Rev., 11 OTR 61 at 64 . Although our scope of review is de novo, we accord some deference to the Tax Court’s findings concerning a witness’s credibility.

Brown v. City of Silverton

50 Or. 425 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 16, 1908

The material facts being identical with the case of Cusiter v. City of Silverton, 50 Or. 419 ( 93 Pac. 234 ), that case is controlling.