Case law

Brown v. Spokane, Portland & Seattle Railway Co.

248 Or. 110 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 20, 1967

The plaintiff Viola V. … Brown v. Louisville and Nashville R. R. Co., 234 F2d 204, 206 (5th cir, 1956).

Gowan-Lenning-Brown Co. v. Kingman

116 Or. 650 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 4, 1925

The rent was reckoned at $75 per month, and the board and room of the daughter at $20 per month. There is no testimony that either of these terms was unreasonable. … State v. Steeves, 29 Or. 85 ( 43 Pac. 947 ). This principle is also announced in Chance v. Graham, 76 Or. 199 ( 148 Pac. 63 ), and in Sabin v. Kyniston, 81 Or. 358 ( 159 Pac. 69 ).

Brown v. Hayden Island Amusement Co.

233 Or. 416 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 20, 1963

Brown testified that “If you looked real close you could see it * * *.” Mrs. Brown described the marker as “very pale.” The plaintiff was not asked and did not testify whether she observed the markers. … In Johnson v. Hot Springs Land & Imp.

Rise v. Board of Parole

304 Or. 385 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 24, 1987

In Santobello v. … See, e.g., Palermo v.

Martz v. Board of Parole

301 Or. 400 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 5, 1986

Like the petitioner in Price v. … Board of Parole, 301 Or 393 , 723 P2d 314 (1986), this petitioner argued to the Court of Appeals and to this court that the Board of Parole (Board) “abused its discretion” by not overriding the minimum sentence imposed by

Brown v. Belcrest Memorial Park Ass'n

149 Or. 625 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 25, 1935

Coad v. M. Brown & Sons, Inc.

276 Or. 797 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 26, 1976

State Land Board v. Campbell

140 Or. 196 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1932

to which it is a party, the state is the real party in interest: State Land Board v. … Co. v. Bramwell, 108 Or. 261 , ( 217 P. 332 , 32 A. L. R. 829), and cases cited. In conformity to this rule, it was held in State Land Board v.

State Land Board v. Gennies

204 Or. 443 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 18, 1955

This is an appeal by Albert Gennies, et al., alleged to be the heirs at law of Henry Otto Genies, deceased, from a decree escheating the latter’s estate to the State Land Board. … The State Land Board brought an escheat proceeding in the county court pursuant to § 21-101, OCLA, as amended by ch 105, Oregon Laws 1943, ORS 120.030, whereupon Albert Gennies, the alleged brother, and the alleged nephews

State Land Board v. SAUSE

217 Or. 52 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1959

This is an appeal by the state through its land board (ORS 273.410) from a decree of the circuit court which, after trial of the suit, dismissed the complaint that the board had filed in the name of the state. … Pierce of the state land board by the attorney general and found in 26 Ops Atty Gen 167. The issue involved was the power of the state land board to lease a privately dredged navigable channel between two tidal rivers.

Board of Commissioners v. Babcock

5 Or. 472 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1875

In the case of Bishop v.

Engle v. State Land Board

164 Or. 109 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 29, 1940

J., Abatement and Revival, section 303, note 16, page 175, citing Selden v. Illinois Trust Etc. Bank, 239 Ill. 67 , 87 N. E. 860 , 130 Am. St. Rep. 180 and note; Hitt v. Scammon, 82 Ill. 519 ; Turney v. … J., Escheat, sec. 42, at page 862, notes 78-81, citing Fenstermacher v. State, 19 Or. 504 , 25 P. 142 ; White v. White, 2 Metc. (Ky.) 185, Com. v. Thomas, 140 Ky. 789 , 131 S. W. 797 .

Brown v. United States National Bank

265 Or. 161 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 2, 1973

The writer then concludes: “It is' not clear from the opinion of Cordon v. Gregg what scope the court intends the doctrine to have.” ② With this ambiguity as to the holding in Cordon v. … Waterway Terminals v. P. S. Lord, 242 Or 1 , 406 P2d 556 , 13 ALR3d 1 (1965).

State Land Board v. Davidson

147 Or. 504 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 26, 1934

In the instant case, the bonds and other obligations of respondent being prior in time to the mortgage of the State Land Board, different principles apply. In State Land Board v. … Co. v. Cowden, supra.

Barton v. Brown

117 Or. 525 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 23, 1926

Johnson v. Circuit Court, 114 Or. 6 ( 233 Pac. 563 ), it is clear that the affidavit of prejudice came too late, and, in fact, defendant so conceded upon the argument. … Bean, Brown and Belt, JJ., concur.

State Land Board v. Braun

167 Or. 218 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 16, 1941

No cross-interrogatories were submitted by counsel representing the state land board. … In view of this presumption (State v.

State Land Board v. Ransom

158 Or. 197 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 21, 1937

Board, said property to be sold subject to the lien of the taxes accrued and due against said property up to the 30th of April, 1936. … To the same effect see: 3 Thompson on Real Property, 543, 544, § 2427, et seq.; Attorney General’s Opinions, 1934-1936, Nov. 16,1934, p. 151; Annotation to Louisville School Board v. King, 15 L. R. A. (N. S.) 382.

Will v. District Boundary Board

141 Or. 54 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 18, 1932

They rely strongly on School District No. 79 v. District No. 2, 121 Ark. 584 ( 182 S. W. 268 ), and Rural School District v. Tatum, 139 Ark. 3 ( 211 S. W. 923 ). These cases are not in point. … J., Brown and Belt, JJ., concur.

Gliem v. Board of Commissioners

16 Or. 479 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 28, 1888

said assignment, and demanded from the board a deed to the said lands to him in his own name. … The board thereupon refused to execute such a deed to the respondent, for the reason that it appeared from the records of the board that a deed had theretofore been executed to respondent for three hundred and twenty acres

Templeton v. Board of Parole

350 Or. 574 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 18, 2011

258 P.3d 1240 (2011) 350 Or. 574 TEMPLETON v. BOARD OF PAROLE. (S059494). Supreme Court of Oregon. August 18, 2011. Petition for Review Denied.