Case law

State v. Caraher

293 Or. 741 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 2, 1982

In State v. Brown, 291 Or 642 , 643 P2d 212 (1981) we found that Chadwick by using the phrase “personal property not immediately associated with the person of the arrestee” had distinguished it from Robinson . … In State v. Brown, supra, we went one step further and said that the defendant could be searched at the jail as an incident to the arrest.

Gibbs v. Multnomah County

219 Or. 84 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 18, 1959

Brown v. Irwin, Executrix, 187 Or 462, 475 , 212 P2d 729 ; La Grande v. Municipal Court et al, 120 Or 109, 115 , 251 P 308 . In Kadderly v. … Brown v. Irwin, supra, 178 Or 474 , and cases there cited. The opinion of Chief Justice McBride in an opinion on rehearing in Libby v.

Herrick v. Barzee

96 Or. 357 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 25, 1920

Rep. 441); Brown v. Brown, 34 Barb. (N. Y.) 533; Nutt v. Knut, 200 U. S. 12 ( 50 L. Ed. 348 , 26 Sup. Ct. Rep. 216); McGowan v. Parish, 237 U. S. 285 ( 59 L. Ed. 955 , 35 Sup. Ct. Rep. 543, see, also, Rose’s U. S. … Co., 50 Or. 464 ( 93 Pac. 356 ); Peabody v. Oregon R. & N. Co., 21 Or. 121, 136 ( 26 Pac. 1053 , 12 L. R. A. 823); Brown v. Oregon Lumber Co., 24 Or. 317 ( 33 Pac. 557 ); Barr v.

Sprague v. Straub

252 Or. 507 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 26, 1969

Thus in Utah State Land Board v. … We would not agree with this interpretation. ⑥ But see, Dade County, Florida Board of Public Instruction v.

In re Assignment of Bank

32 Or. 84 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 7, 1897

In Robb v. … Ervin, 9 Or. 52 ; Gammons v. Holman, 11 Or. 284 ( 3 Pac. 676 ); Helm v. Gilroy, 20 Or. 517 ( 26 Pac. 851 ).

State v. Cannon

11 Or. 312 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1884

(Commonwealth v. Wymouth, 2 Allen, 144 ; Brown v. Rice, 57 Me., 56; The People v. Duffy, 5 Barb., 205 .)

Multnomah County v. First National Bank

151 Or. 342 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 10, 1935

Oregon Fruit Growers Association v. Lents, 107 Or. 561 ( 212 P. 811 ); McLaughlin v. Helgerson, 116 Or. 310 ( 241 P. 50 ); State v. Eaton, 119 Or. 613 ( 250 P. 233 ); State ex rel. v. … The amendment is therefore repugnant to the constitution as embracing a subject not mentioned in the title of the act: Gaston v. Thompson, 89 Or. 412 ( 174 P. 717 ); State v.

In Re Waters of Rogue River

124 Or. 7 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1927

See Cameron v. Bucldey, 117 Or. 477 ( 244 Pac. 662 ). The claim of A. S. … J., and Brown and Belt JJ., concur.

Senter v. Peninsula Lumber Co.

109 Or. 325 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 13, 1923

The questions, both of law and of fact, presented by this appeal are identical with those considered by the court in the case of Hicks v. Peninsula Lumber Co., ante, p. 305 ( 220 Pac. 133 ). … J., and Bean and Brown, JJ., concur.

Wheeler v. Boise Cascade Corp.

298 Or. 452 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 8, 1985

The Court of Appeals reversed the Board by distinguishing Hutcheson and Weller . The Court of Appeals held that the record did not support the Weller and Stupfel v. … The decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed and the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board is reinstated. 1 In Weller v.

Collins v. Heckart

127 Or. 34 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 3, 1928

Among the decisions, see Gregoire v. Rourke, 28 Or. 275 ( 42 Pac. 996 ); Haviland v. Johnson, 70 Or. 83 ( 139 Pac. 720 ). … v.

State v. Stilwell

100 Or. 637 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 8, 1921

Superior Court, 88 Wash. 344 ( 153 Pac. 7 ); State v. Superior Court, 88 Wash. 669 ( 153 Pac. 1078 ); State v. Superior Court, 106 Wash. 507 ( 180 Pac. 481 ). 1, 2. … Brown, J., took no part in the consideration of this ease.

Hillend v. Koltsch and Frink

183 Or. 460 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 30, 1948

McIntosh v. McNair, 53 Or. 87, 90-91 , 99 P. 74 ; citing Huber v. Miller, 41 Or. 103 , 68 P. 400 ; see also Johnson v. Hoffman, et al, 132 Or. 46 , 284 P. 567 . Mr. … In support of his first assignment of error, defendant Koltsch also cites Collander v. Brown — Stone v. Brown, 178 P. 2d 922 , 44 Adv. Sheets 389.

Western Oregon Trust Co. v. Hendricks

77 Or. 104 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 20, 1915

not included therein, without alleging and proving that some fraud was practiced upon them to prevent such stipulation from being inserted in the written contract, and there is nothing of that kind in this ease: Looney v. … Rankin, 15 Or. 617 ( 16 Pac. 660 ); Stoddard v. Nelson, 17 Or. 417 ( 21 Pac. 456 ); Sutherlin v. Bloomer, 50 Or. 398 ( 93 Pac. 135 ).

Dibble v. David Hodes Co.

132 Or. 596 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 1, 1930

The motion is ruled by White v. East Side Mill Co., 84 Or. 224 ( 161 P. 969 , 164 P. 736 ); Vincent v. First Nat. Bank, 76 Or. 579 ( 143 P. 1100 , 149 P. 938 ); Wolf v. … Brown, J., did not participate in this opinion.

State v. Cloran

233 Or. 400 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 26, 1963

Berry and Walker, 204 Or 69 , 267 P2d 993 , 267 P2d 995 , 282 P2d 344 , 282 P2d 347 ; and State v. Brown, 5 Or 119 . … Co. v.

Personius v. Asbury Transportation Co.

152 Or. 286 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 20, 1935

It was filed with the board on August 8, 1933. … Clark v. Olson, wherein the opinion cites and follows King v.

Smith v. County of Washington

241 Or. 380 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 29, 1965

Page et ux. v. City of Portland et al., 178 Or 632, 640 , 165 P2d 280 (1946). … In Page et ux. v.

In Re Complaint as to Conduct of Devers

328 Or. 230 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 22, 1999

The Oregon State Professional Responsibility Board recommended that this court reciprocally suspend the accused from the practice of law in Oregon *237 based on his Michigan suspension. … See In re Brown, 326 Or 582, 598 , 956 P2d 188 (1998) (court gives weight to trial panel assessment of credibility).

Edney v. COLUMBIA COUNTY BD. OF COM'RS

318 Or. 138 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 16, 1993

Edney v. Columbia County Board of Commissioners, supra, 119 Or.App. at 12, 849 P.2d 1125 . … Wright v.