Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersor

8,515 results

2.13s

  • Ludwick v. Yamhill County

    298 Or. 302 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 4, 1984

    Copies of the notice shall be served by registered or certified mail upon the board, and all other parties of record in the board proceeding. * * * * “(6) Petitions and briefs shall be filed within time periods and in a manner … Ensley v. Fitzwater, 293 Or 158 , 645 P2d 1062 (1982) (jurisdiction upon notice of appeal describing a nonappealable order but attaching copy of an appealable *306 judgment).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Hereford

    295 Or. 604 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 7, 1983

    The Trial Board found Hereford guilty of all the charges in each cause of the complaint. … The five member Disciplinary Review Board concurred with the Trial Board’s decision and its recommendations.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Benton County v. Friends of Benton County

    294 Or. 79 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 23, 1982

    Marbet v. … Megdal v. Board of Dental Examiners, 288 Or 293, 317-320 , 605 P2d 273 (1980).

    Cited 38 timesPublished
  • State v. Jewett

    48 Or. 577 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 26, 1906

    There is only one State Land Board in this state, and no board outside of the state has control of any of the state school lands within this state, so the application speaks for itself. 3. … Under Section 5 of Article VIII of the Constitution of Oregon, the Governor, Secretary of State and State Treasurer constitute.the board of commissioners for the sale of state lands, and are, therefore, a constitutional board

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Daniels v. City of Portland

    124 Or. 677 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 8, 1928

    BROWN, J. … Justice Brown in Camfield v. United States, 167 U. S. 518, 524 ( 42 L. Ed. 260 , 17 Sup. Ct. Rep. 864, see, also, Rose’s U. S. Notes), citing Rideout v. Knox, 148 Mass. 368 ( 19 N. E. 390 , 12 Am. St. Rep. 560 , 2 L. R.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Union Bond & Trust Co. v. M & M Wood Working Co.

    256 Or. 384 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 11, 1970

    See Parkinson v. Caldwell, 126 Cal App 2d 548, 272 P2d 934, 937 (1954), quoting from La Rue v. Groesinger, 84 Cal 281, 283, 24 P 42, 43 (1890). … See Lulay v. Lulay, 247 Or 497, 501 , 429 P2d 802 (1967) and Aspinwall v. Ryan, 190 Or 530, 540 , 226 P2d 814 (1951).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Warner v. Myers

    4 Or. 72 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1870

    The principal question of fact to be ascertained in this proceeding is, what was the decision of the Board of Canvassers ? To whom did that Board award the certificate of election ? … (Lawrence v. Houghton, 5 Johnson, 128 ; 6 Hill, 114 ; 4 Renmen, 329; 2 Seldon, 137.)

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Dahl v. Crain Et Ux.

    193 Or. 207 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 21, 1951

    Justice Hay in Monger et ux. v. … In Weiss v.

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • Gurdane v. Northern Wasco County Peoples' Utility District

    183 Or. 565 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 6, 1948

    Board of Directors of Northern Wasco County Peoples’ Utility District v. Kelly, et al., 171 Or. 691 , 137 P. (2d) 295 . … Wheeler v. City and County of Denver, 231 F. 8 . In Dougan Co. v. Klamath County, 99 Or. 436, 457 , 193 P. 645 , the court quotes with approval from Avery v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Howard v. Jackson

    213 Or. 447 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 30, 1958

    See Grider v. Turnbow, 162 Or 622 , 94 P2d 285 and Zumstein v. … Miles v. Hemenway, 59 Or 318 , 111 P 696 , 117 P 273 ; Mascall v. Erikson, 131 Or 509 , 382 P 2 ; Atkochunas v. Gustafson, 156 Or 126 , 66 P2d 1192 ; Share v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Boothe v. Bennett

    249 Or. 31 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 24, 1968

    In Brown v. Siemens, the president of a bank told an anxious depositor who presented a withdrawal form that the bank was solvent, and thereby induced him to leave his money in the bank. … The case is distinguishable from the case at bar for the reason that in Brown v. Siemens there was no allegation that the banker received a direct and personal benefit by reason of his fraud.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Mattiza v. Foster

    311 Or. 1 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 20, 1990

    The court, citing Browning Debenture Holders’ Committee v. … In Browning Debenture Holders’ Committee v.

    Cited 132 timesPublished
  • State v. Layne

    244 Or. 510 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 19, 1966

    The first challenges the constitutionality of the relevant sections of the Uniform Narcotic Drug Act on the ground that the statute delegates to the State Board of Pharmacy the duty to define narcotic drugs. … The ambiguity in the wording and punctuation of Art I, § 16, has been resolved by State v. Wong Si Sam, 63 Or 266 , 127 P 683 (1912); State v. Daley, 54 Or 514 , 103 P 502 , 104 P 1 (1909); State v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • State v. Caraher

    293 Or. 741 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 2, 1982

    In State v. Brown, 291 Or 642 , 643 P2d 212 (1981) we found that Chadwick by using the phrase “personal property not immediately associated with the person of the arrestee” had distinguished it from Robinson . … In State v. Brown, supra, we went one step further and said that the defendant could be searched at the jail as an incident to the arrest.

    Questioned by State v. Langevin, 84 Or. App. 376 (1987)Cited 183 timesPublished
  • Gibbs v. Multnomah County

    219 Or. 84 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 18, 1959

    Brown v. Irwin, Executrix, 187 Or 462, 475 , 212 P2d 729 ; La Grande v. Municipal Court et al, 120 Or 109, 115 , 251 P 308 . In Kadderly v. … Brown v. Irwin, supra, 178 Or 474 , and cases there cited. The opinion of Chief Justice McBride in an opinion on rehearing in Libby v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Herrick v. Barzee

    96 Or. 357 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 25, 1920

    Rep. 441); Brown v. Brown, 34 Barb. (N. Y.) 533; Nutt v. Knut, 200 U. S. 12 ( 50 L. Ed. 348 , 26 Sup. Ct. Rep. 216); McGowan v. Parish, 237 U. S. 285 ( 59 L. Ed. 955 , 35 Sup. Ct. Rep. 543, see, also, Rose’s U. S. … Co., 50 Or. 464 ( 93 Pac. 356 ); Peabody v. Oregon R. & N. Co., 21 Or. 121, 136 ( 26 Pac. 1053 , 12 L. R. A. 823); Brown v. Oregon Lumber Co., 24 Or. 317 ( 33 Pac. 557 ); Barr v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Sprague v. Straub

    252 Or. 507 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 26, 1969

    Thus in Utah State Land Board v. … We would not agree with this interpretation. ⑥ But see, Dade County, Florida Board of Public Instruction v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • In re Assignment of Bank

    32 Or. 84 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 7, 1897

    In Robb v. … Ervin, 9 Or. 52 ; Gammons v. Holman, 11 Or. 284 ( 3 Pac. 676 ); Helm v. Gilroy, 20 Or. 517 ( 26 Pac. 851 ).

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • State v. Cannon

    11 Or. 312 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1884

    (Commonwealth v. Wymouth, 2 Allen, 144 ; Brown v. Rice, 57 Me., 56; The People v. Duffy, 5 Barb., 205 .)

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Nicholson v. Blachly

    305 Or. 578 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 3, 1988

    Wimer v. Miller, 235 Or 25 , 383 P2d 1005 (1963). … See Tracy v. Lane County, 305 Or 378 , 752 P2d 300 (1988).

    Cited 13 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.