Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
8,515 results
2.13s
298 Or. 302 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 4, 1984
Copies of the notice shall be served by registered or certified mail upon the board, and all other parties of record in the board proceeding. * * * * “(6) Petitions and briefs shall be filed within time periods and in a manner … Ensley v. Fitzwater, 293 Or 158 , 645 P2d 1062 (1982) (jurisdiction upon notice of appeal describing a nonappealable order but attaching copy of an appealable *306 judgment).
Cited 3 timesPublishedIn Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Hereford
295 Or. 604 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 7, 1983
The Trial Board found Hereford guilty of all the charges in each cause of the complaint. … The five member Disciplinary Review Board concurred with the Trial Board’s decision and its recommendations.
Cited 7 timesPublishedBenton County v. Friends of Benton County
294 Or. 79 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 23, 1982
Marbet v. … Megdal v. Board of Dental Examiners, 288 Or 293, 317-320 , 605 P2d 273 (1980).
Cited 38 timesPublished48 Or. 577 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 26, 1906
There is only one State Land Board in this state, and no board outside of the state has control of any of the state school lands within this state, so the application speaks for itself. 3. … Under Section 5 of Article VIII of the Constitution of Oregon, the Governor, Secretary of State and State Treasurer constitute.the board of commissioners for the sale of state lands, and are, therefore, a constitutional board
Cited 3 timesPublished124 Or. 677 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 8, 1928
BROWN, J. … Justice Brown in Camfield v. United States, 167 U. S. 518, 524 ( 42 L. Ed. 260 , 17 Sup. Ct. Rep. 864, see, also, Rose’s U. S. Notes), citing Rideout v. Knox, 148 Mass. 368 ( 19 N. E. 390 , 12 Am. St. Rep. 560 , 2 L. R.
Cited 12 timesPublishedUnion Bond & Trust Co. v. M & M Wood Working Co.
256 Or. 384 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 11, 1970
See Parkinson v. Caldwell, 126 Cal App 2d 548, 272 P2d 934, 937 (1954), quoting from La Rue v. Groesinger, 84 Cal 281, 283, 24 P 42, 43 (1890). … See Lulay v. Lulay, 247 Or 497, 501 , 429 P2d 802 (1967) and Aspinwall v. Ryan, 190 Or 530, 540 , 226 P2d 814 (1951).
Cited 2 timesPublished4 Or. 72 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1870
The principal question of fact to be ascertained in this proceeding is, what was the decision of the Board of Canvassers ? To whom did that Board award the certificate of election ? … (Lawrence v. Houghton, 5 Johnson, 128 ; 6 Hill, 114 ; 4 Renmen, 329; 2 Seldon, 137.)
Cited 14 timesPublished193 Or. 207 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 21, 1951
Justice Hay in Monger et ux. v. … In Weiss v.
Cited 25 timesPublishedGurdane v. Northern Wasco County Peoples' Utility District
183 Or. 565 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 6, 1948
Board of Directors of Northern Wasco County Peoples’ Utility District v. Kelly, et al., 171 Or. 691 , 137 P. (2d) 295 . … Wheeler v. City and County of Denver, 231 F. 8 . In Dougan Co. v. Klamath County, 99 Or. 436, 457 , 193 P. 645 , the court quotes with approval from Avery v.
Cited 3 timesPublished213 Or. 447 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 30, 1958
See Grider v. Turnbow, 162 Or 622 , 94 P2d 285 and Zumstein v. … Miles v. Hemenway, 59 Or 318 , 111 P 696 , 117 P 273 ; Mascall v. Erikson, 131 Or 509 , 382 P 2 ; Atkochunas v. Gustafson, 156 Or 126 , 66 P2d 1192 ; Share v.
Cited 10 timesPublished249 Or. 31 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 24, 1968
In Brown v. Siemens, the president of a bank told an anxious depositor who presented a withdrawal form that the bank was solvent, and thereby induced him to leave his money in the bank. … The case is distinguishable from the case at bar for the reason that in Brown v. Siemens there was no allegation that the banker received a direct and personal benefit by reason of his fraud.
Cited 1 timesPublished311 Or. 1 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 20, 1990
The court, citing Browning Debenture Holders’ Committee v. … In Browning Debenture Holders’ Committee v.
Cited 132 timesPublished244 Or. 510 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 19, 1966
The first challenges the constitutionality of the relevant sections of the Uniform Narcotic Drug Act on the ground that the statute delegates to the State Board of Pharmacy the duty to define narcotic drugs. … The ambiguity in the wording and punctuation of Art I, § 16, has been resolved by State v. Wong Si Sam, 63 Or 266 , 127 P 683 (1912); State v. Daley, 54 Or 514 , 103 P 502 , 104 P 1 (1909); State v.
Cited 4 timesPublished293 Or. 741 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 2, 1982
In State v. Brown, 291 Or 642 , 643 P2d 212 (1981) we found that Chadwick by using the phrase “personal property not immediately associated with the person of the arrestee” had distinguished it from Robinson . … In State v. Brown, supra, we went one step further and said that the defendant could be searched at the jail as an incident to the arrest.
Questioned by State v. Langevin, 84 Or. App. 376 (1987)Cited 183 timesPublished219 Or. 84 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 18, 1959
Brown v. Irwin, Executrix, 187 Or 462, 475 , 212 P2d 729 ; La Grande v. Municipal Court et al, 120 Or 109, 115 , 251 P 308 . In Kadderly v. … Brown v. Irwin, supra, 178 Or 474 , and cases there cited. The opinion of Chief Justice McBride in an opinion on rehearing in Libby v.
Cited 1 timesPublished96 Or. 357 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 25, 1920
Rep. 441); Brown v. Brown, 34 Barb. (N. Y.) 533; Nutt v. Knut, 200 U. S. 12 ( 50 L. Ed. 348 , 26 Sup. Ct. Rep. 216); McGowan v. Parish, 237 U. S. 285 ( 59 L. Ed. 955 , 35 Sup. Ct. Rep. 543, see, also, Rose’s U. S. … Co., 50 Or. 464 ( 93 Pac. 356 ); Peabody v. Oregon R. & N. Co., 21 Or. 121, 136 ( 26 Pac. 1053 , 12 L. R. A. 823); Brown v. Oregon Lumber Co., 24 Or. 317 ( 33 Pac. 557 ); Barr v.
Cited 13 timesPublished252 Or. 507 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 26, 1969
Thus in Utah State Land Board v. … We would not agree with this interpretation. ⑥ But see, Dade County, Florida Board of Public Instruction v.
Cited 15 timesPublished32 Or. 84 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 7, 1897
In Robb v. … Ervin, 9 Or. 52 ; Gammons v. Holman, 11 Or. 284 ( 3 Pac. 676 ); Helm v. Gilroy, 20 Or. 517 ( 26 Pac. 851 ).
Cited 8 timesPublished11 Or. 312 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1884
(Commonwealth v. Wymouth, 2 Allen, 144 ; Brown v. Rice, 57 Me., 56; The People v. Duffy, 5 Barb., 205 .)
Cited 20 timesPublished305 Or. 578 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 3, 1988
Wimer v. Miller, 235 Or 25 , 383 P2d 1005 (1963). … See Tracy v. Lane County, 305 Or 378 , 752 P2d 300 (1988).
Cited 13 timesPublished
Ask Donna