Case law

Simon v. Portland Common Council

9 Or. 437 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1881

This object was also effected by making the decision of this board final and conclusive in all cases of contested elections. From the decision of this board there is no appeal. … Co. v. Railroad Commissioners, 118 Mass., 563 ; Crawford v. Township Board, 22 Mich., 405 .) The judgment of the circuit court should be affirmed, and it is so ordered. Judgment affirmed.

Holmes v. State Industrial Accident Commission

227 Or. 562 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 31, 1961

The *569 papers were properly filed and were approved by tbe Industrial Accident Board. … The decision held: “The compensation agreement approved by the board had the same effect as an award of the board.”

Foland v. Jackson County

311 Or. 167 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 7, 1991

Foland v. Jackson County, 18 Or LUBA 731 (1990). … See Foland v.

Chance v. Coquille Indian Tribe

327 Or. 318 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 16, 1998

Co., Inc. v. U.S., 666 F Supp 1437, 1441 (D Idaho 1987) (same). See also Central Machinery Co. v. … Clearly, Anderson needed Board approval to enter into contracts on CEDCO’s behalf and, consequently, also needed Board approval to waive CEDCO’s immunity.

State v. Noble

314 Or. 624 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 25, 1992

He relies on the decision of the Court of Appeals in State v. Brown, 96 Or App 171 , 772 P2d 429 (1989). State v. … As State v. Brown, supra, 96 Or App at 175 , intimated, an exception to the warrant requirement exists when the facts giving rise to probable cause occur “in the presence of the court.” Utley v.

Benton County v. Friends of Benton County

294 Or. 79 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 23, 1982

Marbet v. … Megdal v. Board of Dental Examiners, 288 Or 293, 317-320 , 605 P2d 273 (1980).

State Ex Rel. Sisemore v. Standard Optical Co.

182 Or. 452 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 13, 1947

Semler v. Oregon State Board of Dental Examiners, 148 Or. 50, 53 , 34 P. (2d) 311 . … Georgia State Board, etc., v. Friedmans’ Jewelers, 183 Ga. 669 , 189 S. E. 238 ; State v. Goodman, 206 Minn. 203, 288 N.W. 157; Jaeckle v. Bamberger & Co., 119 N. J. Eq. 126, 181 A. 181 ; Dvorine v.

Chavez v. Boise Cascade Corporation

307 Or. 632 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 18, 1989

Convalescent Ctr. v. Dept. of Income M., 208 Conn 187, 544 A2d 604 (1988). We therefore examine what the present Board order decided regarding plaintiffs ability to perform the work he previously had done. … Parklane Hosiery Co. v.

Kidney Association of Oregon v. Ferguson

315 Or. 135 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 31, 1992

See Silbiger V. … Mirabito v.

BAY CREEK LUMBER AND MFG. CO. v. Cesla

213 Or. 316 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 19, 1958

. *318 The referee found all truck loads accounted for except four, representing an aggregate of 25,225 board feet, of a value of $58.42 per thousand board feet. … Crane v. School District No. 14, 95 Or 644, 651 , 188 P 712 ; Anderson v. North Pacific Lumber Co., 21 Or 281, 282 , 28 P 5 ; Graham v. Corvallis & E. R.

Rogue Valley Sewer Services v. City of Phoenix

357 Or. 437 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 16, 2015

State ex rel Haley v. … Brown v. Brown, 206 Or App 239, 248, 136 P3d 745 (2006), rev den, 341 Or 449 (2006) (internal quotation and cita- tion omitted); see also Central Oregon Fabricators, Inc. v.

Union Bond & Trust Co. v. M & M Wood Working Co.

256 Or. 384 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 11, 1970

See Parkinson v. Caldwell, 126 Cal App 2d 548, 272 P2d 934, 937 (1954), quoting from La Rue v. Groesinger, 84 Cal 281, 283, 24 P 42, 43 (1890). … See Lulay v. Lulay, 247 Or 497, 501 , 429 P2d 802 (1967) and Aspinwall v. Ryan, 190 Or 530, 540 , 226 P2d 814 (1951).

State v. Layne

244 Or. 510 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 19, 1966

The first challenges the constitutionality of the relevant sections of the Uniform Narcotic Drug Act on the ground that the statute delegates to the State Board of Pharmacy the duty to define narcotic drugs. … The ambiguity in the wording and punctuation of Art I, § 16, has been resolved by State v. Wong Si Sam, 63 Or 266 , 127 P 683 (1912); State v. Daley, 54 Or 514 , 103 P 502 , 104 P 1 (1909); State v.

Schneider v. Hutchinson

35 Or. 253 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 29, 1899

Rep. 360 ) ; People v. Van Rensselaer, 8 Barb. 201 ; People v. Clarke, 10 Barb. 144 ; People v. Rector, etc. of Trinity Church, 22 N. Y. 44 ; Wyatt v. Tisdale, 97 Ala. 594 ( 12 South. 233 ); Price v. Jackson, 91 N. … City of San Francisco, 50 Cal. 265 ; People v. Pope, 53 Cal. 437 ; *258 Board of Education v. Martin, 92 Cal. 209 ( 28 Pac. 799 ).

Lovell v. Potts

112 Or. 538 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 24, 1924

BROWN, J. Section 45 — 1, Or. … In Sprague v.

Boothe v. Bennett

249 Or. 31 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 24, 1968

In Brown v. Siemens, the president of a bank told an anxious depositor who presented a withdrawal form that the bank was solvent, and thereby induced him to leave his money in the bank. … The case is distinguishable from the case at bar for the reason that in Brown v. Siemens there was no allegation that the banker received a direct and personal benefit by reason of his fraud.

Smith v. ABEL

211 Or. 571 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 23, 1957

Krause v. Bell Potato Chip Co., 149 Or 388, 394 , 39 P2d 363 ; Randles v. Nickum & Kelly, 169 Or 284, 287 , 127 P2d 347 . In McGinnis v. … Barnard & Bunker v. Houser, 68 Or 240, 243 , 137 P 227 ; Oregon Fisheries v. Elmore, 69 Or 340, 343 , 138 P 862 . And ordinarily the custom must be pleaded. Barnard & Bunker v. Houser, supra; Simms v.

Hamilton v. Corvallis General Hospital Ass'n

146 Or. 168 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 31, 1934

R. 721); Schloendorff v. Society of New York Hospital, 211 N. Y. 125 ( 105 N. E. 92 ; 52 L. R. A. (N. S.) 505, Ann. Cas. 1915C, 581); Brown v. St. Luke’s Hospital Association, 85 Colo. 167 ( 274 P. 740 ); O’Neill v. … Board of Review, 290 Ill. 108 ( 125 N. E. 7, 10 ); 11 C. J. 303.

State v. Bucholz

317 Or. 309 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 5, 1993

See State v. … See State v. Castrejon, supra, 317 Or at 212 ; State v. Jensen, 313 Or 587, 598-99 , 837 P2d 525 (1992).

Spencer v. Carlson

36 Or. 364 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1900

Dec. 700 ); State v. Cole, 17 Wis. *674; State v. Fowler, 41 La. Ann. 380 ( 6 South. 602 ). … Stat. § 35 ; Simonds v. Powers’ Estate, 28 Vt. 354 ; State ex. rel. v. Mitchell, 50 Kan. 289 ( 33 Pac. 104 , 20 L. R. A. 306). As Mr.