Case law

Milwaukie Co. of Jehovah's Witnesses v. Mullen

214 Or. 281 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 17, 1958

Nutini v. Zoning Board of Review of City of Cranston, 78 RI 421, 82 A2d 883, 885 (1951); Kindergan v. Board of Adjustment of Borough of River Edge, 137 NJL 296, 59 A2d 857, 858, 859 (1948); People ex rel. Polcini v. … Also see Rexon v. Board of Adjustment, 10 NJ 1, 89 A2d 233, 234-5 (1952) (decision by Brennan, J., now of U. S. Supreme Court); Sweck v. Zoning Board of Review, 77 RI 8, 72 A2d 679 (1950); O’Neill v.

Vinton v. Hoskins

174 Or. 106 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 21, 1944

State Board of Equalization, 39 Wyo. 461, 273 , P. 696; State ex rel. v. Gaitskill, 133 Kan. 389 , 300 P. 326 ; State v. Jay J. Garfield Bldg. … Co., 39 Ariz. 45 , 3 P. (2d) 983 ; In re Maury, 97 Mont. 316 , 34 P. (2d) 380 ; Green v. State Highway Board, 172 Ga. 618 , 158 S. E. 329 ; Charleston National Bank v. Fox, 116 W. Va. 487 , 182 S.

School District No. 1 v. Gleason

178 Or. 577 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 18, 1946

State ex rel v. Simon, 20 Or. 365 , 26 P. 170 ; State ex rel v. Kozer, 115 Or. 638 , *580 239 P. 805 ; Kneeland v. Multnomah Co., 139 Or. 356 , 10 P. 2d 342 ; State ex rel v. … Hoss, 143 Or. 383 , 22 P. 2d 883 ; State ex rel v. Hayworth, 152 Or. 416 , 53 P. 2d 1048 .

State v. Hall

37 Or. 479 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 17, 1900

It was so held by the Supreme Court of Iowa, under a statute conferring upon the boards of county supervisors substantially the same powers as conferred upon the county courts of this state : Wilhelm v. … We think, therefore, the board of supervisors had the power to employ the plaintiff to render the service in question.”' The decision in Burness v.

State v. Kragt

368 Or. 577 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 30, 2021

In a per curiam opinion, the Court of Appeals rejected that argument, relying on its decisions in Norris v. Board of Parole, 237 Or App 1, 238 P3d 994 (2010), rev den, 350 Or 130 (2011), and Delavega v. … “At the same time, the legislature created the State Sentencing Guidelines Board (the Board) to serve as the administra- tive body that would adopt the guidelines in the form of 3 As the Court of Appeals explained

Stovall v. Sally Salmon Seafood

306 Or. 25 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 7, 1988

On judicial review, the Court of Appeals affirmed the Board’s decision. 4 Stovall v. Sally Salmon Seafood, 84 Or App 612 , 735 P2d 18 (1987). … Foster v.

Rothenfluch v. Department of Revenue

312 Or. 1 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 8, 1991

Rothenfluch v. Dept. of Rev., 11 OTR 322 (1990). Taxpayers appeal, and the department cross-appeals. … See also Hood River County v. Dept. of Rev., 8 OTR 279, 287 (1980) (department is required to issue final orders).

Association of Unit Owners of the Inn v. Gruenfeld

277 Or. 259 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 25, 1977

The Board of Directors shall fix a monthly assessment for each unit in an amount sufficient to provide for all current expenses, a reasonable reserve for future expenses, and such other expenses as the Board of Directors … Failure to enforce any provision hereof shall not constitute a waiver of the right thereafter to enforce that provision or any other provision hereof.” *265 In Bauman v.

State v. Tauscher

227 Or. 1 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 12, 1961

Brown, Personal Property (2nd Ed 1955), §7, p. 13. … Coleman, 119 Or 430, 435-436 , 249 P 1049 (1926); State v. Browning, 47 Or 470, 472 , 82 P 955 (1905). In State v. Miller, 192 Or 188, 193 , 233 P2d 786 (1951), opinion by Mr.

State v. Cornwall

102 Or. 220 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 22, 1921

J., p. 874, §44; Ausplund v. Aetna Indemnity Co., 47 Or. 10 ( 81 Pac. 574 , 82 Pac. 12 ); Gray v. McDonald, 19 Wis. 213, 229 . … McBride, Harris and Brown, JJ., concur.

Goodson v. Public Employees Retirement System

351 Or. 173 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 6, 2011

Co. v. … Board of Regents v.

State v. Anderson

242 Or. 368 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 12, 1966

See the comment on Stale v. Wilson in State v. Howell, 237 Or 382, 388 , 388 P2d 282 . … See, also, Breeding v. State, 220 Md 193, 199, 151 A2d 743 .

United Pacific Insurance v. Schetky Equipment Co.

217 Or. 422 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 29, 1959

Co. v. Milwaukee G. C. Co., 213 Wis 302, 251 NW 491 . … Bates v. Cleaver, 114 NJL 346, 176 A 889, 892. Based upon these well-recognized principles (United States F. & G. Co. v.

Clarke v. Oregon Health Sciences University

343 Or. 581 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 28, 2007

Brown, and Ronald W. … In Hale v.

Lowe v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.

344 Or. 403 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 1, 2008

See Zehr v. … Doe v.

Portland v. Portland Ry., L. & P. Co.

80 Or. 271 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 25, 1916

If the board of tax commissioners makes the assessment, the amount is governed by the “true cash value,” and for the purpose of determining that value the board may take into consideration “the entire gross receipts and net … Rep. 496); Society for Savings v. Coite, 6 Wall. 594 ( 18 L. Ed. 897 ); Provident Inst. v. Massachusetts, 6 Wall. 611 ( 18 L. Ed. 907 ); Hamilton Co. v. Massachusetts, 6 Wall. 632 ( 18 L. Ed. 904 ); Commonwealth v.

Morales v. SAIF Corp.

339 Or. 574 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 15, 2005

In support of that contention, claimant initially argues that this court’s decision in Buddenberg v. … In Cutright v.

State v. School District No. 3

78 Or. 188 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 13, 1915

requesting said boundary board to direct the school board of each district in said union high school district to state in the notice for the next annual or special meeting or election that *192 the question of dissolving … Astoria, 49 Or. 520 ( 90 Pac. 153 ); McBee v. Springfield, 58 Or. 459 ( 114 Pac. 637 ); Schubel v. Olcott, 60 Or. 503 ( 120 Pac. 375 ); State ex rel. v. Portland, 65 Or. 273 ( 133 Pac. 62 ); State ex rel. v.

Dunn v. City of Redmond

303 Or. 201 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 14, 1987

Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. … See Suess Builders v.

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Staar

324 Or. 283 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 11, 1996

A trial panel of the Disciplinary Board entered an Order of Default and ordered that all allegations contained in the Bar’s complaint “are deemed admitted by virtue of this default.” … P2d 466 (1993) (six-month suspension for assisting client in preparation of fraudulent documents); In re Hawkins, 305 Or 319 , 751 P2d 780 (1988) (disbarment for filing of false affidavit and using false evidence); In re Brown