Case law

McMahan v. Canadian Railway Co.

40 Or. 148 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 2, 1901

Brown, Vancouver, British Columbia, a copy of the paper in the meanwhile. … In such an event, where the plaintiff does not procure leave to and amend the complaint so as to make it conform to the proofs, it is proper to grant a nonsuit: Tomlinson v. Monroe, 41 Cal. 94 ; Johnson v.

Blalock v. CITY OF PORTLAND

206 Or. 74 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 14, 1955

Chapter V, insofar as applicable to the matter before us, is as follows: “Upon duly verified application of a member and a finding by the Board that through injury or sickness caused by the performance of duty or in line … Price v. Society for Savings, 64 Conn 362, 30 A 139, 42 Am St Rep 198; Logue v. Fenning, 29 DC App 519; State ex rel. Holton v. City of Tampa, 119 Fla 556, 159 So 292, 98 ALR 506 ; The People v. Bd.

Pleasant View Irrigation Co. v. Milton-Freewater & Hudson Bay Irrigation Co.

141 Or. 492 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 13, 1932

Co. v. Finis Irr. … J., and Brown, J., not sitting.

Wells v. Applegate

12 Or. 208 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 17, 1885

(Young v. Martin, 8 Wall. 357 .) So, “when a-, pleading is amended, the original pleading ceases to be a part of the record, because the party pleading having the power, has elected to make the change.” (Brown v. … Y. 495 ; Tennant v. Pfister, 45 Cal. 270 ; Barada v. Carondelet, 8 Mo. 649 ; Bowles v. Doble, 11 Oreg. 474 .)

Heyting v. Bottaglia

123 Or. 517 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 2, 1927

*518 BROWN, J. This suit involves an age-old cause of dispute, the proper location of the boundary line fence between.the farm lands of the principals to the contest. … Cook, 57 Or. 535 ( 112 Pac. 709 ); Chapman v. Dean, 58 Or. 475 ( 115 Pac. 154 ); Bayne v. Brown, 60 Or. 110 ( 118 Pac. 282 ); Thomas v. Spencer, 66 Or. 359 ( 133 Pac. 822 ); Parker v.

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Richmond

285 Or. 469 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 8, 1979

The trial board and the disciplinary review board recommended that the charge be dismissed. We concur and dismiss the charge for the reasons that follow. Facts. … See Craig v. Harney, 331 US 367 (1947); Pennekamp v. Florida, 328 US 331 (1946).

Lawrey v. Sterling

41 Or. 518 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 7, 1902

styled the “State Land Board,” and such board shall have power, and is hereby authorized, to use a common seal, and the secretary of state shall procure such a seal for said board: Laws, 1899, p. 156, § 2. … Whether the State Land Board is a corporation within the rule announced in Dunn v.

Page v. Thomas Kay Woolen Mill Co.

168 Or. 434 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 10, 1942

Pickens testified that the consensus of opinion of the board was that the 1933 bonus should be paid on Mr. … Maidment v. Russell, 159 Or. 653, 663 , 81 P. (2d) 136 , 82 P. (2d) 692 . We conclude, therefore, that the decree of the circuit court should be affirmed.

Watson v. Fantus

275 Or. 605 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 22, 1976

Miller et ux v. Barker et ux, 233 Or 113 , 377 P2d 343 (1962); Brown et ux v. Hassenstab et ux, 212 Or 246 , 319 P2d 929 (1957); Scott v. Walton, 32 Or 460 , 52 P 180 (1898). 4. … See Brown et ux v. Hassenstab et ux, supra. See also Miller et ux v. Barker et ux, supra; Nimrod Park, Inc. v. Rose, 265 Or 221 , 508 P2d 183 (1973); Engelking v.

Gilliam County v. Department of Environmental Quality

316 Or. 99 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1993

See also INS v. … County v.

Ackerman v. Physicians & Surgeons Hospital

207 Or. 646 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 27, 1956

Policy is determined by a board of governors, and staff members must be approved by this board. No patient may be treated except by a member of the staff. … Baird v. Boyer, 187 Or 131, 140 , 210 P2d 118 ; Callander v. Brown, 181 Or 279, 282 , 178 P2d 922 . 8.

Moe v. Pratt, Sheriff

178 Or. 320 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 13, 1946

Guthrie v. … Taggart v.

Oregon School Employees Ass'n v. Rainier School District No. 13

311 Or. 188 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 21, 1991

See generally Mastro *195 Plastics Corp. v. … The Employment Relations Board “order after remand” is affirmed.

State v. Ware

79 Or. 367 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 8, 1916

Both laws require the application for a license to be made to the state banking board and give such board power to reject such application upon proper notice and a public hearing “before issuing such license,” so we are not … Chief Justice Shaw, in Wright v. Oakley, 5 Met.

Miller v. Henry

62 Or. 4 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 21, 1912

Ashbury, 41 Cal. 525 ; Creighton v. Board of Supervisors, 42 Cal. 447 ; Board of Education v. McLandsborough, 36 Ohio St. 227 ( 38 Am. Rep. 582 ) ; Town of Guilford v. Board of Supervisors, 13 N. … E. 1089 ) ; Johnson v. Board, etc. 140 Ind. 152 ( 39 N. E. 311 .)

Nally v. Richmond

105 Or. 462 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 24, 1922

What was done thereafter was merely to aggravate or increase the damages. ’ ’ In Brown v. Manter, 32 N. H. 468, the court said: “The gist of the action of trespass is the disturbance of the possession. … Bean, Brown and McCouRT,t JJ., concur.

Jasper v. Wells

173 Or. 114 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 9, 1943

Judson v. Bee Hive Auto Service Co., supra; Lehl v. Hull, 152 Or. 470 , 53 P. (2d) 48 , 54 P. (2d) 290 (1936); Kantola v. Lovell Auto Co., 157 Or. 534 , 72 P. (2d) 61 (1937); Brown v. … Brown v. Fields et al., supra, 160 Or. at p. 29 . “* * * it logically follows that if the reasonableness of such purported inference is absent, the inference itself is nonexistent. ’ ’ Bumnell v.

Ragan v. MacGill

134 Or. 408 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 12, 1930

Defendant refers to the rule laid down in the case of Hall v. Brown, 102 Or. 389 ( 202 P. 719 ). … J., Brown and Belt, JJ., concur.

Enders v. Northwestern Trust Co.

125 Or. 673 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 18, 1928

In support of our construction of the by-law see Triplett v. Fauver, 103 Va. 123 ( 48 S. E. 875 ); Eddy v. Barry, 99 Ill. App. 266 ; Barstow v. City R. R. Co., 42 Cal. 465 ; Henry v. … W. 523 ); Marks v. Rocsand Co., 49 Ont. L. Rep. 137. In Triplett v.

Bolt v. Influence, Inc.

333 Or. 572 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 28, 2002

Id. at 461-66 (citing, e.g., Tippin v. Ward, 5 Or 450, 453 (1875); Collins v. United Brokers Co., 99 Or 556, 559-60 , 194 P 458 (1921)). … State v. Brown, 306 Or 599, 602 , 761 P2d 1300 (1988) (emphasis in original). In other words, “[o]nly when there is no evidence to support an element may the claim be withdrawn from the jury’s consideration.”