Case law

Hanson v. Mosser

247 Or. 1 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 26, 1967

James & Yost v. Board of Higher Edu., 216 Or 598 , 340 P2d 577 (1959). … In Inge v.

Kelley v. Devin

65 Or. 211 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 20, 1913

Brown v. Lord, 7 Or. 302 , cited by the defendant here, was a *216 suit to compel specific performance of an agreement said to have been made by a father, then deceased, to convey, land to his son. … Other cases showing that it is competent to make such a contract are Johnson v. Hubbell, 10 N. J. Eq. 332 ( 66 Am. Dec. 773 ); Brown v. Sutton, 129 U. S. 238 ( 32 L. Ed. 664 , 9 Sup. Ct. Rep. 273); Teske v.

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Smith

289 Or. 501 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 23, 1980

One member of the Board dissented by an opinion in which he agreed with the findings and recommendations of the Trial Board. … See Megdal v. Board of Dental Examiners, 288 Or 293 , 605 P2d 273 (1980).” It is clear from the record that the conduct of the accused does not come within terms of DR 9-101(A), (B) or (C).

Mast v. Kern

34 Or. 247 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 7, 1898

v. … Law Reg. 481 ; Crispin v. Babbitt, 81 N. Y. 516 ( 37 Am. Rep. 521 ); McCosker v. Long Island R. R. Co., 84 N. Y. 77 ; Hussey v. Coger, 112 N. Y. 614 ( 8 Am. St. Rep. 787 , 3 L. R. A. 559, 20 N. E. 556 ); Brown v.

Moore v. Frazer

15 Or. 635 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 30, 1888

In Biddle v. … And the same principle is stated in Crane v. Hardy, 1 Mich. 56 ; Shafer v. Bolander, 4 Iowa, 201 ; Griffith v. Bogert, 18 How. 158 ; Laudes v. Perkins, 12 Mo. 329 ; Butterfield v. Walsh, 21 Iowa, 97 ; Yates v. St.

Association of Unit Owners of the Inn v. Gruenfeld

277 Or. 259 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 25, 1977

The Board of Directors shall fix a monthly assessment for each unit in an amount sufficient to provide for all current expenses, a reasonable reserve for future expenses, and such other expenses as the Board of Directors … Failure to enforce any provision hereof shall not constitute a waiver of the right thereafter to enforce that provision or any other provision hereof.” *265 In Bauman v.

Timber Structures, Inc. v. C. W. S. Grinding & MacHine Works

191 Or. 231 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 28, 1951

In Paget v. … . *251 In Barr v. World Keepfresh Co., 77 Or. 95, 99 , 150 P. 747 , the court approved the inclusion of board furnished as a part of the reasonable value of the labor performed.

Poe v. State Treasurer

144 Or. 561 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 20, 1933

The most satisfactory one seems to be that given by Lord Macnaghten in Commissioners of Income Tax v. Pemsel, 1891, A. C., at p. 583. … In Eustace v. Dickey, 240 Mass. 55 ( 132 N.

Wheeler Lumber, Bridge & Supply Co. v. Shelton

146 Or. 550 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 2, 1934

Brown, 49 Or. 423, 425 ( 90 P. 673 ). In Fulp v. … L., p. 79, § 58; Merinella v. Swartz, 123 Wash. 521 ( 212 P. 1052 ); Schumann v. Bank of California, 114 Or. 336, 344 ( 233 P. 860 , 37 A. L. R. 1531, 1538); Rawley v. Brown, 71 N. Y. 85, 89 .

Monger Et Ux. v. Dimmick

187 Or. 253 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 27, 1949

The agreed price was to be $1.50 per M. board feet for red and yellow fir and ponderosa pine, $5.00 per M. board feet for sugar pine, and $1.00 per M. board feet for white fir and all other lands of merchantable timber. … . * * * ” Adams v.

Strauhal v. Asiatic Steamship Co.

48 Or. 100 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 17, 1906

Rep. 688 ); Hawkesworth v. Thompson, 98 Mass. 77 ( 93 Am. Dec. 137 ) ; Cuddy v. Horn, 46 Mich. 596 ( 10 N. W. 32 , 41 Am. Rep. 178 ); Slater v. Mersereau, 64 N. Y. 138 ; Brown v. Coxe (C. C.), 75 Fed. 689 ; Flaherty v. … Judge Seaman says in Brown v.

Ex parte Young

49 L.R.A. 153 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1900

Coleman, 1 Or. 192 ; State v. Brown, 2 Or. 221 ; Fox v. Ohio, 46 U. S. (5 How.) 410 ; United States v. Marigold, 50 U. S. (9 How.) *560; Moore v. Illinois, 55 U. S. (14 How.) 13 ; Ex parte Siebold, 100 U. … Ct. 826); Brown v. Houston, 114 U. S. 622 (5 Sup. Ct. 1091).

Baines v. Coos Bay Navigation Co.

45 Or. 307 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 5, 1904

of directors, saving that the board of directors shall be a board of control over him, and whenever they shall give him special instructions he shall be bound strictly to adhere to them.” … In Castle v.

Warren v. Lane County

297 Or. 290 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 19, 1984

In its motion to dismiss, Lane County relies on Citadel Corp. v. Tillamook Co., 66 Or App 965 , 675 P2d 1114 (1984), Carmel Estates, Inc. v. … See Jefferson Landfill Comm. v. Marion Co., 297 Or 280 , 686 P2d 310 (1984).

Cullop v. Rogue Valley Physicians' Service, Inc.

263 Or. 621 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 30, 1972

Co. v. Marr, 254 P2d 289 (9th Cir 1958), cert den 358 US 839 , 79 S Ct 63 , 3 L Ed 2d 74 (1958); Travelers Insurance Company v. Esposito, 171 So 2d 177 (Fla App 1965); McKinney v. American Sec. Life Ins. … Co. v. Hornbeak, 266 SW2d 228 (Tex Civ App 1954).

Wiseman v. N. P. R. R.

20 Or. 425 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 31, 1891

. § 558; Simpson v. Dall, 3 Wall. 460 ; Johnson v. Arnwine, 42 N. J. L. 451, 36 Am. Rep. 527 ; Kelsey v. Hanmer, 18 Conn. 310 .) Thus in Mariner v. … Driggs, 20 Wall. 134 ; Gordon v. Searing, 8 Cal. 49 ; Beattie v. Hilliard, 55 N. H. 428; Brown v. Wood, 19 Mo. 475 ; Shepard v. Giddings, 22 Conn. 282 ; Ralph v. Brown, 3 Watts & S. 395 ; Gordon v.

Kidney Association of Oregon v. Ferguson

315 Or. 135 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 31, 1992

See Silbiger V. … Mirabito v.

England v. Thunderbird & Saif Corp.

315 Or. 633 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 25, 1993

Claimant seeks review of a Court of Appeals decision affirming an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board awarding her nine percent unscheduled permanent partial disability (PPD). England v. … On July 10, 1991, the Workers’ Compensation Board affirmed the referee’s order.

United States Fidelity Co. v. United States Nat. Bank

80 Or. 361 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 9, 1916

Rep. 871 ); Interstate National Bank v. Claxton, 97 Tex. 569 ( 80 S. W. 604 , 104 Am. St. Rep. 885 , 65 L. R. A. 820); Safe *366 Deposit & Trust Co. v. Diamond National Bank, 194 Pa. 334 ( 44 Atl. 1064 ); Batchelder v. … It had no more right to do this than it had to pay the check of Jones out of Brown’s deposit.

Chavez v. Boise Cascade Corporation

307 Or. 632 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 18, 1989

Convalescent Ctr. v. Dept. of Income M., 208 Conn 187, 544 A2d 604 (1988). We therefore examine what the present Board order decided regarding plaintiffs ability to perform the work he previously had done. … Parklane Hosiery Co. v.