Case law

East County Bargaining Council v. Centennial School District No. 28JT

298 Or. 146 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 30, 1984

Subsequent to the board’s final order, however, the Court of Appeals decided that there is no legal remedy for violations of the statutory procedures. Smith v. … Because we think that the Employment Relations Board should have an opportunity to consider the effect of Smith v.

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Bell

294 Or. 202 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1982

Silbernagel v. Goin, 41 Or App 269 , 597 P2d 1287 (1979). 2 The Trial Board found the accused guilty of the charge made in these proceedings and recommended that he be administered a public reprimand. … The Disciplinary Review Board substantially agreed with the Trial Board as to the facts and concluded: “Finally, we note that the Trial Board has given the accused the benefit of the doubt where, from reading the transcript

Moe v. Pratt, Sheriff

178 Or. 320 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 13, 1946

Guthrie v. … Taggart v.

State ex rel. Griffin v. State Industrial Accident Commission

145 Or. 443 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 9, 1934

Co. v. Hampton, 33 Ga. App. 476 ( 127 S. E. 155 ); Pye v. Southwestern Gas & Electric Co., 147 La. 537 ( 85 So. 232 ); Sizza v. W. H. Compton Shear Company, 10 N. J. Misc. 1168 ( 163 Atl. 143 ); Rothschild & Co. v. … Brown v. Nevada Industrial Commission, 40 Nev. 220 ( 161 P. 516 ); Woodcock v. Board of Education, 55 Utah 458 ( 187 P. 181 , 10 A. L. R. 181); State ex rel. Nagy v. Industrial Commission, 41 Ohio App. 549 ( 180 N.

Basche v. Pringle

21 Or. 24 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 14, 1891

(Hill’s Code, § 535; State v. Brown, 5 Or. 119 .) The order from which this appeal is taken is not such final judgment.

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Hannon

214 Or. 51 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 30, 1958

See also Kirchoff v. Bernstein, 92 Or 378 , 181 P 746 . These pronouncements of our own court cannot be too often emphasized. … State v. January, 353 Mo 324, 182 SW2d 323 ; State ex rel. Nebraska State Bar Association v. Rein, 141 Neb 758, 4 NW2d 829 ; In re Cherry, 116 Minn 448, 208 NW 197 ; People ex rel. Black v.

Joseph Milling Co. v. First Bank of Joseph

109 Or. 1 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 10, 1923

Brown Co., there is no evidence, aside from the indorsements on the check,, to indicate how the check came into the hands of The S. S. Brown Co. … J. 178, 179, 181; Los Angeles Investment Co. v. Home Savings Bank, 180 Cal. 601 ( 182 Pac. 293 , 5 A. L. R. 1193); Shaw, Kendall & Co. v. Brown, 128 Mich. 573 ( 87 N. W. 757 ); Weishaar v.

Sears v. Orchards Water Co.

115 Or. 291 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 29, 1924

Rep. 169 ); Stanley v. Luse , 36 Or. 25 ( 58 P. 75 ). … In this contention the appellants are supported by respectable authority: Shelby *Page 296 v. Farmers' Ditch Co. , 10 Idaho 723 ( 80 P. 222 ); Adams v. Twin Falls Co. , 29 Idaho 357 ( 161 P. 322 ); Reynolds v.

City of Eugene v. State

339 Or. 113 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 11, 2005

PERB will implement the judgment entered in City of Eugene v. … See Yancy v. Shatzer, 337 Or 345 , 97 P3d 1161 (2004) (moot case not justiciable); Hamel v.

James v. State of Oregon

366 Or. 732 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 6, 2020

Arken v. City of Portland, 351 Or 113, 163, 263 P3d 975 (2011), opin- ion adh’d to on recons sub nom Robinson v. Public Employees Retirement Board, 351 Or 404, 268 P3d 567 (2011). … Under petitioners’ proposed approach, the board 756 James v.

EAST CTY. BARGAINING COUN. v. Centennial Sch. Dist.

298 Or. 146 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 30, 1984

Subsequent to the board's final order, however, the Court of Appeals decided that there is no legal remedy for violations of the statutory procedures. Smith v. School District No. 45, 63 Or. … Because we think that the Employment Relations Board should have an opportunity to consider the effect of Smith v.

City of Eugene v. STATE, PERB

341 Or. 120 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 30, 2006

Inter-venors are individual PERS members who intervened in the litigation below to defend, in part, employer contribution rate orders issued by the Public Employees Retirement Board (PERB) in 1998 and 2000. … Because we concluded that their appeal had become moot, intervenors now ask this court, in keeping with First Commerce of America v.

Zeek v. Union School District No. 5

188 Or. 45 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 2, 1949

school board.” … State v. Hingley, 32 Or. 440 , 52 P. 89 ; Lathen v. Campbell, 7 Kan. App. 388 , 51 P. 931 .

In Re Estate of Urich

194 Or. 429 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 2, 1952

Albert Solari was approximately two years of age when decedent first commenced to board with the Solari family. … In re Porter's Estate, supra; Trombly et al. v. McKenney, Ex., et al., 191 Or 90, 108 , 228 P2d 417 ; Allen v. Breding, 181 Or 332 , 181 P2d 783 ; 2 Page on Wills, 607, § 814. 6.

Straw v. Harris

54 Or. 424 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 24, 1909

In Dock Co. v. … Murphy v. Board, 57 N. J. Law, 245 ( 31 Atl. 229 ). And there is nothing in the amendement to indicate that its application was to be restricted.

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Gygi

273 Or. 443 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 6, 1975

The disciplinary hearing took place on December 30, 1974, before the Trial Board. In an opinion issued on March 14,1975, the Trial Board recommended the dismissal of count 1 for lack of evidence. … State v.

Graves v. Arnado

307 Or. 358 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 14, 1989

The charter vested county legislative authority in the Board of County Commissioners (Board) and it provided express authority for a county personnel system. … In Mills v.

Parker v. Clatsop County

69 Or. 62 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 27, 1914

Co. v. Village of Wilber, 63 Neb. 624 ( 88 N. W. 660 ). … McHaley, 52 Or. 555 ( 98 Pac. 158 ); Roesch v. Henry, 54 Or. 244 ( 103 Pac. 439 ); Tazwell v. Davis, 64 Or. 325 ( 130 Pac. 400 ). 4.

Hoffman v. Habighorst

53 L.R.A. 908 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 21, 1901

Brown v. … To the same effect is Brown v. Rathburn, 10 Or. 158 ; also Denny v. Seeley, 34 Or. 364 ( 55 Pac. 976 ).

State v. Castrejon

317 Or. 202 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 22, 1993

Ailes v. Portland *210 Meadows, Inc., supra, 312 Or at 382; State v. Brown, 310 Or 347, 355-56 , 800 P2d 259 (1990). 10 An appellate court opinion that fails to satisfy the requirements stated in Ailes v. … In Brown v. Multnomah County Dist.