Case law

Whalen v. Gladden

249 Or. 12 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 24, 1968

He was on parole for 11 years when the parole board revoked his parole for violation of the restriction on the use of intoxicating liquor. … The first argument is answered by Anderson v. Alexander, 1951, 191 Or 409 , 229 P2d 663 , 230 P2d 770 , 29 ALR2d 1051, and by Greenwood v. Gladden, 1962, 231 Or 396 , 373 P2d 417 .

State v. Williams

313 Or. 19 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 26, 1992

State v. Brown, 310 Or 347, 356 , 800 P2d 259 (1990). … Testimony about Board of Parole Practices Defendant next argues that the trial court erred by excluding testimony from an employee of the Board of Parole concerning the Board’s legal interpretation of aggravated murder sentencing

EAST CTY. BARGAINING COUN. v. Centennial Sch. Dist.

298 Or. 146 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 30, 1984

Subsequent to the board's final order, however, the Court of Appeals decided that there is no legal remedy for violations of the statutory procedures. Smith v. School District No. 45, 63 Or. … Because we think that the Employment Relations Board should have an opportunity to consider the effect of Smith v.

Carothers v. Wheeler

1 Or. 194 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1855

(Section 13, page 123, Statutes of Oregon; 1st Pick. 485; Arnold v. U. S. 9 Cond. 104; Cock v. Bunn, 6 John. R. 326.) … Holland, clerk,” and do not show that he was clerk of the board of county commissioners.

State Ex Rel. State Public Welfare Commission v. County Court of Malheur County

185 Or. 392 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 17, 1949

In Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 313 U. S. 146 , 61 Sup. … In the leading case of State v. Briggs, 45 Or. 366 , 77 P. 750 , 78 P. 361 , this court upheld the validity of an act which authorized a board to prescribe the qualifications of barbers. In Savage et al. v.

Oregon Growers' Co-Operative Ass'n v. Riddle

116 Or. 562 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 8, 1925

Assn. v. Jones, 185 N. C. 265 ( 117 S. E. 174 , 33 A. L. R. 231); Brown v. Staple Cotton Co-op. Assn., 132 Miss. 859 ( 96 South. 849 ); Kansas Wheat Growers’ Assn. v. Schulte, 113 Kan. 672 ( 216 Pac. 311 ). … J., and Brown and Belt, JJ., concur.

State ex rel. Griffin v. State Industrial Accident Commission

145 Or. 443 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 9, 1934

Co. v. Hampton, 33 Ga. App. 476 ( 127 S. E. 155 ); Pye v. Southwestern Gas & Electric Co., 147 La. 537 ( 85 So. 232 ); Sizza v. W. H. Compton Shear Company, 10 N. J. Misc. 1168 ( 163 Atl. 143 ); Rothschild & Co. v. … Brown v. Nevada Industrial Commission, 40 Nev. 220 ( 161 P. 516 ); Woodcock v. Board of Education, 55 Utah 458 ( 187 P. 181 , 10 A. L. R. 181); State ex rel. Nagy v. Industrial Commission, 41 Ohio App. 549 ( 180 N.

In Re Estate of Urich

194 Or. 429 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 2, 1952

Albert Solari was approximately two years of age when decedent first commenced to board with the Solari family. … In re Porter's Estate, supra; Trombly et al. v. McKenney, Ex., et al., 191 Or 90, 108 , 228 P2d 417 ; Allen v. Breding, 181 Or 332 , 181 P2d 783 ; 2 Page on Wills, 607, § 814. 6.

Basche v. Pringle

21 Or. 24 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 14, 1891

(Hill’s Code, § 535; State v. Brown, 5 Or. 119 .) The order from which this appeal is taken is not such final judgment.

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Hannon

214 Or. 51 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 30, 1958

See also Kirchoff v. Bernstein, 92 Or 378 , 181 P 746 . These pronouncements of our own court cannot be too often emphasized. … State v. January, 353 Mo 324, 182 SW2d 323 ; State ex rel. Nebraska State Bar Association v. Rein, 141 Neb 758, 4 NW2d 829 ; In re Cherry, 116 Minn 448, 208 NW 197 ; People ex rel. Black v.

Holmes v. Goble

132 Or. 540 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 13, 1929

Appellants cite Smith v. Ozark Water Mills Co., 215 Mo. App. 129 ( 238 S. W. 573 ). In that case the decedent stood on the running board of an automobile after having been invited to sit in the rear seat. … Co. v. Nave, 204 Ky. 733 ( 265 S. W. 289 ); Strong v. Olsen, 74 Cal. App. 518 ( 241 P. 107 ); Rose v. Cartier, 45 R. I. 150 ( 120 Atl. 581 ). In Salemme v.

Knight v. Alexander

42 Or. 521 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 9, 1903

contract must be certain in its terms, both as to the description of the property and the estate to be conveyed; and, unless the land is so described therein that it can be identified, specific performance will be denied: Browne … Frauds (4 ed.), 385; Whiteaker v. Vanschoiack, 5 Or. 113 ; Brown v. Lord, 7 Or. 302, 311 ; Wagonblast v. Whitney, 12 Or. 83 ( 6 Pac. 399 ); Ferguson v. Blackwell, 8 Okla. 489 ( 58 Pac. 647 ); Preston v. Preston, 95 U.

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Bell

294 Or. 202 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1982

Silbernagel v. Goin, 41 Or App 269 , 597 P2d 1287 (1979). 2 The Trial Board found the accused guilty of the charge made in these proceedings and recommended that he be administered a public reprimand. … The Disciplinary Review Board substantially agreed with the Trial Board as to the facts and concluded: “Finally, we note that the Trial Board has given the accused the benefit of the doubt where, from reading the transcript

Sears v. Orchards Water Co.

115 Or. 291 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 29, 1924

Rep. 169 ); Stanley v. Luse , 36 Or. 25 ( 58 P. 75 ). … In this contention the appellants are supported by respectable authority: Shelby *Page 296 v. Farmers' Ditch Co. , 10 Idaho 723 ( 80 P. 222 ); Adams v. Twin Falls Co. , 29 Idaho 357 ( 161 P. 322 ); Reynolds v.

Colclasure v. Washington County School District No. 48-J

317 Or. 526 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 2, 1993

Germain v. … See Lincoln v.

City of Eugene v. State

339 Or. 113 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 11, 2005

PERB will implement the judgment entered in City of Eugene v. … See Yancy v. Shatzer, 337 Or 345 , 97 P3d 1161 (2004) (moot case not justiciable); Hamel v.

East County Bargaining Council v. Centennial School District No. 28JT

298 Or. 146 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 30, 1984

Subsequent to the board’s final order, however, the Court of Appeals decided that there is no legal remedy for violations of the statutory procedures. Smith v. … Because we think that the Employment Relations Board should have an opportunity to consider the effect of Smith v.

State Ex Rel. Smith v. Smith

197 Or. 96 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 7, 1953

Galloway v. … State v.

Joseph Milling Co. v. First Bank of Joseph

109 Or. 1 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 10, 1923

Brown Co., there is no evidence, aside from the indorsements on the check,, to indicate how the check came into the hands of The S. S. Brown Co. … J. 178, 179, 181; Los Angeles Investment Co. v. Home Savings Bank, 180 Cal. 601 ( 182 Pac. 293 , 5 A. L. R. 1193); Shaw, Kendall & Co. v. Brown, 128 Mich. 573 ( 87 N. W. 757 ); Weishaar v.

Matter of Compensation of Grable

291 Or. 387 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 28, 1981

On review, the Workers’ Compensation Board affirmed and adopted the referee’s Opinion and Order. The Court of Appeals affirmed without opinion. In the Matter of the Compensation of Grable v. … In those cases, we remanded to the Court of Appeals to remand to the Board for the Board to consider the circumstances in light of this opinion.