Case law

Starkey v. Lunz

57 Or. 147 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 13, 1910

This case was followed in Shaffer v. Sundwall, 33 Iowa, 579 . In the subsequent case of Murdough v. … In State v.

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Obert

336 Or. 640 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 6, 2004

In re Brown, 326 Or 582, 601 , 956 P2d 188 (1998). … Picard v. Connor, 404 US 270, 275-76 , 92 S Ct 509 , 30 L Ed 2d 438 (1971). See also Coleman v.

State v. Andersen

Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 9, 2017

State v. Brown, 301 Or 268, 274, 721 P2d 1357 (1986). … State v. Andersen, 361 Or 187, 201, ___ P3d ___. Thus, although the majority does not overrule State v. Brown, 301 Or 268, 721 P2d 1357 202 State v.

Milne v. Hess

141 Or. 469 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 6, 1933

The case of State v. Hoffman, decided by the supreme court of Texas, 109 Tex. 133 ( 201 S. … Corporation v. Barrett, 350 Ill. 291 ( 183 N. E. 205 ).

Sloan v. Journal Publishing Co.

213 Or. 324 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 23, 1958

In National Labor Relations Board v. Houston Chronicle Publishing Co., 5th Circuit, 211 F2d 848, the issue was almost identical to that with which we are concerned. … Labor Relations Board v. American Rolling Mill Co., 126 F2d 88 at 41; National Labor Relations Board v. Boso Mfg. Co., 118 F2d 187.

DCBS v. Muliro

Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 16, 2016

The order of the board is reversed, and the case is remanded to the board for further proceedings. 738 DCBS v. Muliro NAKAMOTO, J. … As support, the board cited three Court of Appeals cases “dealing with ‘imputation’ between an employer and its insurer”: Anfilofieff v. SAIF, 52 Or App 127, 627 P2d 1274 (1981); Nix v.

Sterling v. Cupp

290 Or. 611 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 4, 1981

Like "punishment,” see Brown v. Multnomah County Dist. … Board of Dental Examiners, 288 Or 293, 296 , 605 P2d 273 (1980), Rogers v. Department of Revenue, 284 Or 409 , 412 n.2, 587 P2d 91 (1978).

Fish & Wildlife Department v. Land Conservation & Development Commission

288 Or. 203 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 18, 1979

As we pointed out in Joseph v. … See Spicer v. Benefit Ass’n of Ry. Emp., 142 Or 574, 594 , 17 P2d 1107 , 21 P2d 187 (1933); Judkins v. Taffe, 21 Or 89, 92 , 27 P 221 (1891).

Mursener v. Forte

186 Or. 253 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 22, 1948

A decree awarding judgment against defendant Tom Ray for the sum of $10,000, paid to him by the Governing Board after, it was dissolved, was *268 affirmed. Mursener v. … Appellants strongly rely on Duke v. Franklin, supra. In that ease the authority of Franklin to appoint a Governing Board was not questioned or challenged. Certainly, Bay was in no position to do so.

Elmore v. Tillamook County

55 Or. 224 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 28, 1909

This is , a proceeding to review the action of the Tillamook County board of equalization. … As to the sufficiency of the petition for a writ of review, what is said in Elmore Packing Co. *225 v. Tillamook County, 55 Or. 218 ( 105 Pac. 989 ), applies equally to this case. 1.

Derenco, Inc. v. Benj. Franklin Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n

281 Or. 533 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 21, 1978

In Meyers v. … In People v.

Whalen v. Gladden

249 Or. 12 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 24, 1968

He was on parole for 11 years when the parole board revoked his parole for violation of the restriction on the use of intoxicating liquor. … The first argument is answered by Anderson v. Alexander, 1951, 191 Or 409 , 229 P2d 663 , 230 P2d 770 , 29 ALR2d 1051, and by Greenwood v. Gladden, 1962, 231 Or 396 , 373 P2d 417 .

Union School District No. 5 v. Stanley

185 Or. 531 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 18, 1949

V. Chamberlain, Leonard E. Doerfler, J. E. Lewis and J. J. … Will v. District Boundary Board, 141 Or. 54 , 16 P. (2d) 24 , cited by the objectors, is of little, if any, assistance.

Alpha Phi of Sigma Kappa v. Kincaid

180 Or. 568 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 6, 1947

constitute a sufficient memorandum of the contract, provided the person making the offer is the narty to be charged, and the written offer contains all the essential terms *572 of the proposed contract.” citing Friendly v. … Shirley Sanborn, who was treasurer of the corporation and also a member of the Board of Directors, testified that as a member of the Board she approved the changes made by the defendant.

State Ex Rel. Frohnmayer v. Oregon State Bar

307 Or. 304 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 18, 1989

See Frohnmayer v. … Sadler v.

State v. Barnes

120 Or. 372 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 25, 1927

This instruction substantially follows the instruction approved by this court in State v. Harris, 106 Or. 211 ( 211 Pac. 944 ), State v. Brown, 113 Or. 149 ( 231 Pac. 926 ). … Burnett, Brown and Belt, JJ., dissent.

Russell v. Piper

101 Or. 680 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 25, 1921

For precedents in cases arising under various circumstances see 23 Cyc. 972; Kosher v. Stuart, 64 Or. 123 ( 121 Pac. 901 , 129 Pac. 491 ); Brown v. Brown, 37 Minn. 128 , ( 33 N. W. 546 ); Glickman v. Loew, 29 App. … Supp. 1078 ); *686 Brickel v. Train, 86 N. Y. Supp. 292 ; Union Bank v. Benjamin, 61 Wis. 512 ( 21 N. W. 523 ); note to Farmers’ Loan etc. v. Hale, 41 L. R. A. 222.

In re Koken

198 Or. 659 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 24, 1953

In advancing his contention that the Board violated § 47-213, the petition for review says: “The first paragraph of the board’s decision and recommendation states that the decision so to recommend was made by the board on … Kellogg v. Kellogg, 123 Or 639 , 263 P 385 .

Murray v. Helfrich

146 Or. 602 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 14, 1934

“Judge Seamen says in Brown v. … Strauhal v. Asiatic Steamship Company, 48 Or. 100 ( 85 P. 230 ); Brown v. Jones, 130 Or. 424 ( 278 P. 981 ).

Browne v. AL-KHATIB

342 Or. 416 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 21, 2007

154 P.3d 722 (2007) 342 Or. 416 BROWNE v. AL-KHATIB. S54305. Supreme Court of Oregon. February 21, 2007. Petition for review denied.