Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersor

8,515 results

1.75s

  • Mellott v. Downing

    39 Or. 218 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 1, 1901

    defendant admits the ownership “of the property to be in the plaintiff, and claims a *224 right to its possession by virtue of a lien thereon, such lien should be pleaded, and can not be shown under a general denial: Guille v. … Marks, 40 Ill. 313 ; Denton v. Jackson, 106 Ill. 433 ; Larminie v. Garley, 114 Ill. 196 ( 29 N. E. 382 ); Gregory v. Wendell, 39, Mich. 337 ( 33 Am. Rep. 390 ).

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Inland Navigation Co. v. Chambers

    202 Or. 339 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1954

    In Ott v. … Co. v. Browning, 310 U. S. 362, 365 .

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Silverfield v. Multnomah County

    97 Or. 483 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 28, 1920

    The facts in the case of Searing v. Heavysides, 106 Ill. 85 , are almost identical with those in the present instance, and it was there contended that there was an adequate remedy at law. … The opinion of this court in Portland University v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Blaine v. Ross Lbr. Co., Inc.

    224 Or. 227 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 21, 1960

    The view we adopt is supported by Brown v. Underwood Lumber Co., 172 Or 261 , 141 P2d 527 (1943). See also, Johnson v. Timber Structures, 203 Or 670 , 281 P2d 723 (1955); Claussen v. … Campbell v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Smith v. Smith

    197 Or. 96 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 7, 1953

    Galloway v. … State v.

    Cited 34 timesPublished
  • Hayes v. Hayes

    89 Or. 630 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 1, 1918

    The case is to be distinguished from the early case of Brown v. Lord, 7 Or. 302, 307 , wherein the testimony was contradictory as to the particular tract of land that the son was to have. … To all outward appearances, also, the mode of living on the Brown place was the same that it had always been.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Stepp v. SAIF Corp.

    304 Or. 375 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 24, 1987

    The claimant seeks review of the Court of Appeals’ affirmance of a Workers’ Compensation Board order that reversed a referee’s award of permanent total disability. Stepp v. SAIF, 78 Or App 438 , 717 P2d 216 (1986). … Boise Cascade v. Starbuck, 296 Or 238, 240, 245 , 675 P2d 1044 (1984); Sahnow v. Fireman’s Fund, 260 Or 564, 568 , 491 P2d 997 (1971).

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Webb v. Clatsop County School District No. 3

    188 Or. 324 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 28, 1950

    Dist. v. Deschutes Co., 168 Or. 493, 507 , 124 P. 2d 518 ; Cabell v. Cottage Grove, supra. … Fox v. Title and Trust Co., 129 Or. 530, 534 , 277 P. 1003 ; Central Or. Irr. Dist. v. Deschutes Co., supra; Cabell v. Cottage Grove, supra; Paron v. Shakopee, 226 Minn. 222 , 32 N. W. 2d 603 , 2 A. L. R. 2d 1227, 1232.

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Morrow

    297 Or. 808 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 18, 1984

    That Board made essentially the same findings as we have made and as the Trial Board made, as summarized, supra. … See Cook v. Michael, 214 Or 513, 527 , 330 P2d 1026 (1958), for the proposition “ ‘clear and convincing evidence’ means that the truth of the facts asserted is highly probable.”

    Cited 31 timesPublished
  • Reynolds Metals Co. v. Department of Revenue

    300 Or. 250 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 26, 1985

    The Department of Revenue (Department) has petitioned for reconsideration of a portion of our opinion and decision in Reynolds Metals Co. v. Dept. of Rev., 299 Or 592, 606-607 , 705 P2d 712, 720-721 (1985). … As we noted in the original opinion, Reynolds Metals Co. v. Dept. of Rev., 299 Or 592, 595 , 705 P2d 712, 714 (1985), the taxpayer did not question the true cash value of the land as being $1,781,940.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Barendse v. KNAPPA WATER ASSOCIATION

    260 Or. 356 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 24, 1971

    Milk Producers, Inc. v. Campbell, 459 SW2d 114, 117 (Ark, 1970); Bertram v. Danish Creamery Ass’n, 120 Cal App 2d 458, 261 P2d 349, 351 (1953); Benson Coop Creamery Ass’n v. … The evidence in this case demonstrates that the classification in which the board has placed plaintiffs is an unreasonable one. Our opinion in Kliks v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Ibach v. Hoffman

    184 Or. 296 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1948

    Ibach intendéd to pay for her board and lodging. … In Sigman v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Hurst v. Hawn

    5 Or. 275 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1874

    board did right -in making her a deed and in rejecting the subsequent application of the appellant. … The rights extended to settlers of the class to which appellant claims to belong by act of 1866, v^as materially changed by the act of 1868 in two particulars: Erst.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Blyth & Co., Inc. v. City of Portland

    204 Or. 153 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 13, 1955

    Co. v. Ochoco Irr. Dist., 108 Or 1, 19 , 210 P 873 , 216 P 189 . … It is a well-known phenomenon of modern life in the metropolitan centers, concerning which we had occasion to comment in the opinion in Thompson v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Starkey v. Lunz

    57 Or. 147 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 13, 1910

    This case was followed in Shaffer v. Sundwall, 33 Iowa, 579 . In the subsequent case of Murdough v. … In State v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Nepom v. Department of Revenue

    272 Or. 249 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 12, 1975

    In Pittsburgh Miracle Mile v. Board of Prop. … A similar stipulation restricting the issues only to the value of the land was also stricken as improper in Deitch Company v. Board of Property Ass., App., & Rev., 417 Pa 213, 209 A2d 397 (1965).

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Obert

    336 Or. 640 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 6, 2004

    In re Brown, 326 Or 582, 601 , 956 P2d 188 (1998). … Picard v. Connor, 404 US 270, 275-76 , 92 S Ct 509 , 30 L Ed 2d 438 (1971). See also Coleman v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Churchill v. Meade

    92 Or. 626 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 24, 1919

    Brown, 24 Or. 548 ( 34 *634 Pac. 475 , 38 Pac. 4 ), the plaintiff showed no excuse for not urging against the confirmation the very objections presented in the complaint. Farmers’ Loan Co. v. Oregon-Pacific R. R. … For example, in Board of School Commissioners v. Bender, 36 Ill. App. 164 ( 72 N.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • State v. Andersen

    Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 9, 2017

    State v. Brown, 301 Or 268, 274, 721 P2d 1357 (1986). … State v. Andersen, 361 Or 187, 201, ___ P3d ___. Thus, although the majority does not overrule State v. Brown, 301 Or 268, 721 P2d 1357 202 State v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Milne v. Hess

    141 Or. 469 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 6, 1933

    The case of State v. Hoffman, decided by the supreme court of Texas, 109 Tex. 133 ( 201 S. … Corporation v. Barrett, 350 Ill. 291 ( 183 N. E. 205 ).

    Cited 3 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.