Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersor

8,515 results

1.78s

  • Burt v. Blumenauer

    299 Or. 55 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 23, 1985

    Board of Education, supra, and Stanson v. Mott, supra, or for “drowning out” the free speech of opposing voices, a problem acknowledged in Miller v. California Com’n on Status of Women, supra. … In Gosso v.

    Cited 44 timesPublished
  • R. E. Davis Electric Co., Inc. v. Hopkins

    155 Or. 510 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 20, 1937

    Oregon Hassam Company, 67 Or. 576 ( 134 P. 1184 ); Savage v. Glenn, 10 Or. 440 . … In Wood v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Romero v. State Compensation Department

    250 Or. 368 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 15, 1968

    Plaintiff requested a Board review of the award under ORS 656.295. The Board affirmed the Hearing Officer and plaintiff then appealed to the circuit court under ORS 656.298. … For the foregoing reasons, we feel compelled to hold that the judgment of the trial court must be reversed and the order of the Workmen’s Compensation Board be reinstated. It is so ordered. ① Coday v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • J. R. Widmer, Inc. v. Department of Revenue

    261 Or. 371 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 9, 1972

    Co. v. … Multnomah County, supra; Douglas Land Co. v. Clatsop County, 87 Or. 462 ( 169 P. 790 ); Weyerhaeuser Land Co. v. Board of Equalization, 85 Or. 434 ( 165 P. 1164 ); Northern Pac. Ry. Co. v.

    Cited 30 timesPublished
  • Barendse v. KNAPPA WATER ASSOCIATION

    260 Or. 356 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 24, 1971

    Milk Producers, Inc. v. Campbell, 459 SW2d 114, 117 (Ark, 1970); Bertram v. Danish Creamery Ass’n, 120 Cal App 2d 458, 261 P2d 349, 351 (1953); Benson Coop Creamery Ass’n v. … The evidence in this case demonstrates that the classification in which the board has placed plaintiffs is an unreasonable one. Our opinion in Kliks v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • State v. Hemenway

    353 Or. 498 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 25, 2013

    Id. at 349 (quoting Brown ” v. Oregon State Bar, 293 Or 446, 449, 648 P2d 1289 (1982)). … The state cites Kerr v.

    Cited 39 timesPublished
  • State v. Amini

    331 Or. 384 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 14, 2000

    Ricco v. … In State v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel Sprague v. Straub

    240 Or. 272 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 14, 1965

    These are designated in these proceedings as the University of Oregon Donation Fund, State Board of Higher Education Donation Fund, and the State Board’s Suspense Checking Account, the funds of the State Industrial Accident … Allen v. Multnomah County, 1946, 179 Or 548 , 173 P2d 475 .

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Mellott v. Downing

    39 Or. 218 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 1, 1901

    defendant admits the ownership “of the property to be in the plaintiff, and claims a *224 right to its possession by virtue of a lien thereon, such lien should be pleaded, and can not be shown under a general denial: Guille v. … Marks, 40 Ill. 313 ; Denton v. Jackson, 106 Ill. 433 ; Larminie v. Garley, 114 Ill. 196 ( 29 N. E. 382 ); Gregory v. Wendell, 39, Mich. 337 ( 33 Am. Rep. 390 ).

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Cummings Construction Co. v. School District No. 9

    242 Or. 106 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 24, 1965

    Portland Web Pressmen’s Union v. Oregonian Pub. Co., 188 F Supp 859, 864 (DC Or 1960), aff’d 286 F2d 4, cert. den. 366 US 912 , 81 S Ct 1086 , 6 L Ed2d 237. See also, Parks v. … State ex rel Chilcutt v. Thatch, 359 Mo 122, 129, 221 SW2d 172, 176 .

    Cited 52 timesPublished
  • Sterling v. Cupp

    290 Or. 611 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 4, 1981

    Like "punishment,” see Brown v. Multnomah County Dist. … Board of Dental Examiners, 288 Or 293, 296 , 605 P2d 273 (1980), Rogers v. Department of Revenue, 284 Or 409 , 412 n.2, 587 P2d 91 (1978).

    Cited 159 timesPublished
  • Silverfield v. Multnomah County

    97 Or. 483 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 28, 1920

    The facts in the case of Searing v. Heavysides, 106 Ill. 85 , are almost identical with those in the present instance, and it was there contended that there was an adequate remedy at law. … The opinion of this court in Portland University v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Blaine v. Ross Lbr. Co., Inc.

    224 Or. 227 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 21, 1960

    The view we adopt is supported by Brown v. Underwood Lumber Co., 172 Or 261 , 141 P2d 527 (1943). See also, Johnson v. Timber Structures, 203 Or 670 , 281 P2d 723 (1955); Claussen v. … Campbell v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Hayes v. Hayes

    89 Or. 630 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 1, 1918

    The case is to be distinguished from the early case of Brown v. Lord, 7 Or. 302, 307 , wherein the testimony was contradictory as to the particular tract of land that the son was to have. … To all outward appearances, also, the mode of living on the Brown place was the same that it had always been.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Ellis v. McCall Insulation

    308 Or. 74 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 6, 1989

    The Board also deleted the penalty and modified the attorney fees award. The Court of Appeals affirmed the Board’s decision. 1 Ellis v. McCall Insulation, 93 Or App 188 , 761 P2d 6 (1988). … Ellis v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Johnston v. Wadsworth

    24 Or. 494 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 17, 1893

    J., “proceeds in personam, and may be maintained in any court of equity which has jurisdiction of the parties, even if the land lies in another state or foreign country ”: Brown v. … Elmore, 4 Wis. 214 ; Watson v. McLaren, 19 Wend. 557 ; Miller v. Cook, 23 N. Y. 495 ; Osborne v. Baker, 34 Minn. 307 ( 25 N. W. Rep. 606 ); Brooks v. Morgan, 1 Har. (Del.), 123; Whitney v. Stearns 16 Me. 394 .

    Cited 30 timesPublished
  • Alpha Phi of Sigma Kappa v. Kincaid

    180 Or. 568 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 6, 1947

    constitute a sufficient memorandum of the contract, provided the person making the offer is the narty to be charged, and the written offer contains all the essential terms *572 of the proposed contract.” citing Friendly v. … Shirley Sanborn, who was treasurer of the corporation and also a member of the Board of Directors, testified that as a member of the Board she approved the changes made by the defendant.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Webb v. Clatsop County School District No. 3

    188 Or. 324 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 28, 1950

    Dist. v. Deschutes Co., 168 Or. 493, 507 , 124 P. 2d 518 ; Cabell v. Cottage Grove, supra. … Fox v. Title and Trust Co., 129 Or. 530, 534 , 277 P. 1003 ; Central Or. Irr. Dist. v. Deschutes Co., supra; Cabell v. Cottage Grove, supra; Paron v. Shakopee, 226 Minn. 222 , 32 N. W. 2d 603 , 2 A. L. R. 2d 1227, 1232.

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • Reynolds Metals Co. v. Department of Revenue

    300 Or. 250 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 26, 1985

    The Department of Revenue (Department) has petitioned for reconsideration of a portion of our opinion and decision in Reynolds Metals Co. v. Dept. of Rev., 299 Or 592, 606-607 , 705 P2d 712, 720-721 (1985). … As we noted in the original opinion, Reynolds Metals Co. v. Dept. of Rev., 299 Or 592, 595 , 705 P2d 712, 714 (1985), the taxpayer did not question the true cash value of the land as being $1,781,940.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Ibach v. Hoffman

    184 Or. 296 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1948

    Ibach intendéd to pay for her board and lodging. … In Sigman v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.