Case law

Hostetler v. Eccles

112 Or. 572 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 18, 1924

Cas. 1135); Harris v. Frink, 49 N. Y. 24 ( 10 Am. Rep. 318 ); Reeder v. Sayre, 70 N. Y. 180 ( 26 Am. Rep. 567 ); Bittinger v. Baker, 29 Pa. St. 66 (70 Am. Dec. 154); Sievers v. Brown, 34 Or. 454 ( 56 Pac. 171 , 45 L. R. … J., and Bean and Brown, JJ., concur.

State v. Deal

43 Or. 17 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 3, 1902

That the instruction described the subject of the larceny at the first trial as a brown gelding does not vitiate it. … Ev. (8 ed.) p. *52; Williams v. State, 52 Ala. 411 ; Sayres v. State, 30 Ala. 15 ; Belt v. State, 103 Ga. 12 ( 29 S. E. 451 ).

Multifoods Specialty Distribution v. McAtee

333 Or. 629 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 11, 2002

The Court of Appeals reversed the board, holding that employer had not accepted the prior degenerative condition. Multifoods Specialty Distribution v. McAtee, 164 Or App 654 , 993 P2d 174 (1999). … We allowed claimant’s petition for review, and now we review the board’s order for errors of law. Wilson v. State Farm Ins., 326 Or 413, 415 , 952 P2d 528 (1998). This case involves two questions.

Warner Valley Stock Co. v. Morrow

48 Or. 258 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 24, 1906

The state land board under our law is the land department of the State: Corpe v. Brooks, *263 8 Or. 223 ; Robertson v. State Land Board, 42 Or. 183, 187 ( 70 Pac. 614 ). And, as stated by Mr. … of a certificate of purchase from the board to another applicant under the act and receiving a deed from the board for such lands in his own name.

Clark v. Wick

25 Or. 446 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 13, 1894

The first assignment of error is in the admission of evidence tending to show that plaintiffs furnished board for the defendant and feed for his stock, as alleged in the complaint, and that they purchased the Cree and Fitzwater … Y. 402 ; Walgamood v. Randolph, 22 Neb. 493 , 35 N. W. 217 . An allegation of partnership is only necessary when the cause of action depends on its existence: Abbott’s Trial Evidence, § 203; Loper v. Welch, 3 Duer. 644.

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Obert

336 Or. 640 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 6, 2004

In re Brown, 326 Or 582, 601 , 956 P2d 188 (1998). … Picard v. Connor, 404 US 270, 275-76 , 92 S Ct 509 , 30 L Ed 2d 438 (1971). See also Coleman v.

Wilkeson v. Myers

329 Or. 540 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 16, 1999

Requires forestry board to adopt new restrictions. Allows board to exempt lots 160 acres or smaller on showing of undue economic hardship, if no taking of endangered, threatened wildlife species. … See Phillips v. Myers, 325 Or 221, 227 , 936 P2d 964 (1997) (court makes conforming changes to result statements when modifying caption).

Tuite v. UNION PACIFIC STAGES

204 Or. 565 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 2, 1955

The following authorities are cited to support that contention: Halsan v. Johnson, 155 Or 583 , 65 P2d 661 ; Brown v. Fields, 160 Or 23 , 83 P2d 144 ; Guedon v. … In Hall v. Brown, supra, at page 395, we quoted the following from Leonard v.

Dolph v. Lennon's, Inc.

109 Or. 336 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 20, 1923

L. 828, § 323; Church v. Brown, 15 Ves. Jr. 258 (10 Rev. Rep. 74, 15 Eng. Rul. Cas. 688); Hampshire v. *349 Wickens, 7 Ch. Div. 555 (47 L. J. Ch. 243, 38 L. T. (N. S.) 408, 26 W. R. 491, 15 Eng. Rul. Cas. 699). … J., and Brown and McGourt, JJ., concur.

Houser v. Umatilla County

30 Or. 486 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 31, 1897

In Parsons v. Waukesha County, 83 Wis. 288 ( 53 N. … , and, in Wheelock v.

Hathaway v. Health Future Enterprises

320 Or. 383 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 2, 1994

Therefore, according to the court, the Board had no authority to resolve the dispute. Hathaway v. Health Future Enterprises, 125 Or App 549, 553 , 865 P2d 503 (1993). … See Ailes v.

Hardwick v. Dravo Equipment Co.

279 Or. 619 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 27, 1977

In Kwipco, Inc. v. … In Shepherd v.

Gibson v. State Accident Insurance Fund

288 Or. 45 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 6, 1979

We have held to the contrary in Weller v. Union Carbide, 288 Or 27 , 602 P2d 259 (1979). … Weller, supra; Stupfel v. Edward Hines Lumber Co., 288 Or 39 , 602 P2d 264 (1979). Affirmed.

Korn v. Green

129 Or. 186 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 13, 1929

Browning, 210 Ala. 331 ( 98 South. 23 ); Wren v. Rehfeld, 37 S. D. 201 ( 157 N. W. 323 ); Connelly v. White, 122 Iowa, 391 ( 98 N. W. 144 ); Shinn on Attachments, § 378; 6 C. J. 528. … Bean, Brown and Rossman, JJ., concur.

Central Catholic Education Ass'n v. Archdiocese of Portland

323 Or. 238 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 9, 1996

See State v. … Ibid.; see also Boire v.

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Morrow

297 Or. 808 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 18, 1984

That Board made essentially the same findings as we have made and as the Trial Board made, as summarized, supra. … See Cook v. Michael, 214 Or 513, 527 , 330 P2d 1026 (1958), for the proposition “ ‘clear and convincing evidence’ means that the truth of the facts asserted is highly probable.”

Wynne v. Department of Revenue

342 Or. 515 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 29, 2007

Wynne v. Dept. of Rev., 18 OTR 306 (2005) (order granting motion to dismiss). … In Jarvill v.

Gust v. Edwards Co.

129 Or. 409 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 31, 1929

A. 480); White v. Ladd, 41 Or. 324 ( 68 Pac. 739 , 93 Am. St. Rep. 732 ); Belle v. Brown, 37 Or. 588 ( 61 Pac. 1024 ); Morrill v. Morrill, 20 Or. 96 ( 25 Pac. 362 , 23 Am. St. Rep. 95 , 11 L. R. A. 155).” … Bean, McBride and Brown, JJ., concur.

Hofer v. Hofer

244 Or. 88 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 26, 1966

As the court said in Browning v. … Monnet v. Merz, (Super. Ct. N. Y.,) 17 N. Y. Supp. 380 ; affirmed in 131 N. Y. 646 , 30 N. E. 866 ; Clowes v. Dickenson, 8 Cow. 328 , as explained in Knapp v. Brown, 45 N. Y. 208 ; Tarleton v.

Bump v. Union High School District No. 3

144 Or. 390 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 19, 1933

Foreman v. … From Foreman v.