Case law

Morris v. Parks

145 Or. 481 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 13, 1933

Plaintiff thereupon tendered his continued services under the agreement and notified the board of his readiness and willingness to perform his engagements under said agreement and apprized the board that it was his intention … Burnap v. United States, 252 U. S. 512 ( 40 S. Ct. 374, 376 , 64 L. Ed. 692 ); Gracey v. City of St. Louis, 213 Mo. 384 ( 111 S. W. 1159 ); United States v. Butler, 49 Fed. (2d) 52, 54.

Stone v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.

294 Or. 442 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 18, 1983

SAIF raised no challenge to the compensation award on appeal to the Board. … Co. v. Watkins, 264 Or 464 , 506 P2d 179 (1973). The concession was really an admission that claimant was entitled to interim compensation. Cf. Johnson v. Paulson, 83 Or 238 , 154 P 685 , 163 P 435 (1917).

Miller v. Union County

48 Or. 266 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 17, 1906

Pep. 758); McCall v. Marion County, 43 Or. 536 ( 73 Pac. 1031 , 75 Pac. 140 ). In Hammer v. … Since the opinion in Hammer v.

Nicholson v. Jones

194 Or. 406 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 26, 1952

Creecy v. Joy, supra, 40 Or 33 . … In Maxwell Co. v. So. Ore.

Skookum Co., Inc. v. Employment Division

276 Or. 303 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 30, 1976

The Appeals Board affirmed, one member dissenting. … On appeal from a decision of the Employment Appeals Board, our review is limited to an examination of the record to determine if there is substantial evidence to support that decision. See Bay v.

Oregon v. Davis

42 Or. 34 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 12, 1903

App. 286 ( 51 Pac. 62 ); Davis v. Clark, 58 Kan. 454 ( 49 Pac. 665 ); Sonoma County v. Hall, 132 Cal. 589 ( 62 Pac. 257 , 312, 65 Pac. 12 , 459); Ware v. State, 74 Ind. 181 ; Ada County v. Ellis (Idaho), 48 Pac. 1071 . … App. 286 ( 51 Pac. 62 ); Merchants’ Bank v. Rawls, 21 Ga. 289 ; State to use v. Dailey, 4 Mo. App. 172 ; Lyle v. *40 Murray, 4 Sandf. 390 .

Jenning v. Miller

48 Or. 201 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 29, 1906

. § 797; Pulse v. Hamer, 8 Or. 251 ; White v. Holland, 17 Or. 4 ( 3 Pac. 573 ); Rosenblat v. Perkins, 18 Or. 156 ( 22 Pac. 598 , 6 L. R. A. 257). … Perf. §274; Brown, Stat. Frauds (5 ed.), § 476; Wood v. Thornly, 58 Ill. 470 ; Koch v. National Union Build,. Assoc., 137 Ill. 497 ( 27 N. E. 530 ) ; Swales v. Jackson, 126 Ind. 282 ( 26 N. E. 62 ); Mahana v.

Crim v. Thompson

112 Or. 399 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 21, 1924

Such a denial was sham: Heatherly v. *408 Hadley, 2 Or. 269 ; Peters v. Queen City Ins. Co., 63 Or. 382 ( 126 Pac. 1005 ); Brown v. Scott, 25 Cal. 189 . … But that is no valid excuse: Leinenweber v. Brown, supra. The appellant’s plea of the adjudication of the title in the case of Grim v. Thompson, supra, is a good plea.

Oregon Broadcasting Co. v. Department of Revenue

287 Or. 499 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 2, 1979

An assessed value of either land or improvements must be raised in the appeal to the Board of Equalization. A value not so challenged may not be challenged at some later stage of the tax appeals process. … We adhere to the decision in Domogalla v. Department of Revenue, 283 Or 377 , 584 P2d 256 (1978), that the taxpayer must exhaust his administrative remedies before the Board of Equalization.

Buddenberg v. Southcoast Lumber

316 Or. 180 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 6, 1993

See Fraijo v. Fred N. Bay News Co., 59 Or App 260, 268-69 , 650 P2d 1019 (1982) (Court of Appeals employed the guidelines “merely as a tool”); accord Harwell v. … Buddenburg v. Southcoast Lumber, 112 Or App 148, 152 , 826 P2d 1062 (1992). We allowed review and now affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals.

Baker City Mercantile Co. v. Idaho Cement Pipe Co.

67 Or. 372 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 11, 1913

McGuire, 34 Or. 309 ( 55 Pac. 872 ); Oregon Mill & Grain Co. v. Kirkpatrick, 66 Or. 21 ( 133 Pac. 69, 71 ). … It was not error for the court to submit the case in part to the jury upon the theory of money had and received, which is an action of an equitable character: Edwards v. Mt.

State v. Rubenstein

112 Or. 179 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 16, 1924

BROWN, J. … Chastain, 19 Or. 176 ( 23 Pac. 963 ); State v. Weiss, 63 Or. 462 ( 128 Pac. 448 ); State v. Gear, 72 Or. 501 ( 143 Pac. 890 ); State v. Brown, 73 Or. 325 ( 144 Pac. 444 ); State v. Edlund, 81 Or. 614 ( 160 Pac. 534 ).

Wampler v. Palmerton

250 Or. 65 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 10, 1968

Con zelmann v. N.W.P. & D. Prod. … Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 189 Misc 1024 , 88 NYS2d 914 , 920 (S Ct 1947); Said v. Butt [1920] 3 K B 497.

STATE Ex Rel MEDFORD PEAR CO. v. FOWLER

207 Or. 182 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 28, 1956

State v. Buck, 200 Or 97 , 262 P2d 495 . If the enforcement of an earlier statute would thwart the purpose of a later one, resort will be had to the doctrine of repeal by implication. … Columbia River-Longview Bridge Co. v. Wellington, 140 Or 413 , 13 P2d 1075 . The same reasoning applies to amendments by implication. 82 CJS, Statutes, p 418, § 252.

Norby v. Saif Corp.

303 Or. 536 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 30, 1987

Norby v. SAIF, 82 Or App 157 , 728 P2d 55 (1986). … See Or Laws 1913, ch 112, §§ 21(f) & 21(h); Green v. State Ind. Acc. Com., 197 Or 160 , 251 P2d 437 (1952).

Gore v. Gadd

268 Or. 527 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 16, 1974

Charles Brown, a psychiatrist who described plaintiff’s illness as psychotic agitated depression or psychotic depressive reaction. … Decree affirmed. ① Ortelere v. Teachers’ Retirement Bd. of New York, 25 NY2d 196 , 303 NYS2d 362 , 250 NE2d 460 (1969); Faber v. Sweet Style Mfg. Corp., 40 Misc2d 212, 242 NYS2d 763 (1963).

Harding v. Bell

265 Or. 202 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 2, 1973

For example, Lally v. Kuster, supra, was a malpractice action charging an attorney with negligence in failing to diligently prosecute the client’s foreclosure suit against a mortgage debtor, Mrs. Brown. … Brown] could have secured would have been one based upon the truth of her testimony and all the inferences properly deducible from that testimony.

Robinson v. Nabisco, Inc.

331 Or. 178 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 28, 2000

The Workers’ Compensation Board (Board) upheld employer’s denial of compensation, and the Court of Appeals affirmed. Robinson v. Nabisco, Inc., 143 Or App 59 , 923 P2d 668 (1996). … Krushwitz v.

Grignon v. Shope

100 Or. 611 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 19, 1921

Notes); Day v. Cole, 56 Mich. 294, 296 ( 22 N. W. 811 ); Campbell v. Brown, 64 Iowa, 425, 426 ( 20 N. W. 745 , 52 Am. Rep. 446 ); McCully v. Cooper, 114 Cal. 258, 262 ( 46 Pac. 82 , 55 Am. St. Rep. 66 , 35 L. R. … J., and Johns and Brown, JJ., concur.

State v. Broom

119 Or. 469 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 8, 1926

Glas *472 burn, 116 Or. 451 ( 241 Pac. 846 ); State v. Chase, 106 Or. 263 ( 211 Pac. 920)State v. Holbrook, 98 Or. 43, 97 ( 188 Pac. 947 , 192 Pac. 640 , 193 Pac. 434 ). … J., and Brown and Burnett, JJ., concur.