Case law

Tri-Met, Inc. v. Albrecht

308 Or. 185 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 1, 1989

Tri-Met, Inc. v. Albrecht, 95 Or App 155 , 768 P2d 421 (1989). We reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals and reinstate the board’s award. … Nor do we see the board’s decision as an exercise of agency “discretion.”

State v. O'BRIEN

262 Or. 30 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 26, 1972

Brown v. Bryant, 244 Or 321 , 417 P2d 1002 (1966); 1 Greenleaf on Evidence 330, § 197 (16th ed 1899). … Brown v. Bryant, supra at 325 ; Klever v. Elliott et al, 212 Or 490 , 320 P2d 263 , 70 ALR2d 1094 (1958); Johnson v.

Jarrett v. Wills

235 Or. 51 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1963

It is now settled that in this state only the legislature can waive immunity, James & Yost v. Board of Higher Edu., supra, 1959, 216 Or 598 , 340 P2d 577 ; Vendrell v. … From Barr v.

Miller v. Water Wonderland Improvement District

326 Or. 306 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 23, 1998

[defendant] referenced in other minutes of the board.” … ORS 554.120(1) provides: “The board of directors shall cause to be kept a well-bound book entitled ‘Records of Proceedings of Board of Directors,’ in which shall be recorded minutes of all meetings, proceedings, certificates

Skookum Co., Inc. v. Employment Division

276 Or. 303 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 30, 1976

The Appeals Board affirmed, one member dissenting. … On appeal from a decision of the Employment Appeals Board, our review is limited to an examination of the record to determine if there is substantial evidence to support that decision. See Bay v.

Oregon & Washington Savings Bank v. Catlin

15 Or. 342 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 24, 1887

As this was not done, the board was not authorized to do otherwise than reject it. Theré is also another objection which is fatal to this proceeding, the county and not the board is the proper party. … In Wood v. *345 Riddle, 14 Or. 254 , it was said by StbahAN, J.: “In all analogous cases in this State, from Thompson v. Multnomah County, 2 Or. 34 , to Pruden v.

Wampler v. Department of State Police

224 Or. 439 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 14, 1960

See, also, State v. Sturgess, 10 Or 58, 62 . … State Highway Commission v. Rawson, 210 Or 593, 611 , 312 P2d 849 (1957); Anthony v. Veatch, 189 Or 462, 502 , 220 P2d 493 , 221 P2d 575 (1950); City of Portland v. Duntley, 185 Or 365, 380 , 203 P2d 640 (1949).

Liggett v. Ladd

23 Or. 26 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 5, 1892

In Liggett et al. v. Ladd et al. 17 Or. 89 ( 21 Pac. … The question is raised whether the board of regents of the agricultural college of the state of Oregon was such a body as was capable of taking and holding the title to real property. This court in Dunn v.

Reid v. Kier

175 Or. 192 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 26, 1944

In Thorp v. … Strong v. Kamm & Brown, 13 Or. 172 , 9 Pac. 331 (1886); Feldman v. McGuire, 34 Or. 309 , 55 Pac. 872 (1889); Miles v. Bowers, 49 Or. 429 , 90 Pac. 905 (1907); The Home v. Selling, 91 Or. 428 , 179 Pac. 261 (1919).’

Ollilo v. Clatskanie Peoples' Utility District

170 Or. 173 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 1, 1942

Mississippi Power & Light Co. v. Town of Batesville, 187 Miss. 737 , 193 So. 814 ; Thomas v. McHugh, 65 N. D. 149 , 256 N. W. 763 ; State ex rel. v. Snyder, 129 Ohio State 206 , 194 N. … In the case of Weathers v. Todd County, 271 Ky. 172 , 111 S.

Noble v. Yancey.

116 Or. 356 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 20, 1925

Clancy v. Columbia Irr. Dist., supra. … Louis v. Amy, 120 U. S. 600 ( 30 L. Ed. 798 , 7 Sup. Ct. Rep. 739); Rialto Irr. Dist. v. Stowell, 246 Fed. 294 ( 159 C. C. A. 24 ); Boynton v. Dist.

Myrtle Point Mill & Lumber Co. v. Clarke

102 Or. 533 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 10, 1922

In Oliver v. … Co. v.

Jenning v. Miller

48 Or. 201 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 29, 1906

. § 797; Pulse v. Hamer, 8 Or. 251 ; White v. Holland, 17 Or. 4 ( 3 Pac. 573 ); Rosenblat v. Perkins, 18 Or. 156 ( 22 Pac. 598 , 6 L. R. A. 257). … Perf. §274; Brown, Stat. Frauds (5 ed.), § 476; Wood v. Thornly, 58 Ill. 470 ; Koch v. National Union Build,. Assoc., 137 Ill. 497 ( 27 N. E. 530 ) ; Swales v. Jackson, 126 Ind. 282 ( 26 N. E. 62 ); Mahana v.

Roseburg Forest Products v. Long

325 Or. 305 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 22, 1997

The Board agreed with the administrative law judge’s findings of fact and wrote: “See [Beneficiaries of Strametz v. … In Boise Cascade Corp. v.

STATE Ex Rel MEDFORD PEAR CO. v. FOWLER

207 Or. 182 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 28, 1956

State v. Buck, 200 Or 97 , 262 P2d 495 . If the enforcement of an earlier statute would thwart the purpose of a later one, resort will be had to the doctrine of repeal by implication. … Columbia River-Longview Bridge Co. v. Wellington, 140 Or 413 , 13 P2d 1075 . The same reasoning applies to amendments by implication. 82 CJS, Statutes, p 418, § 252.

Tracy v. Lane County

305 Or. 378 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 29, 1988

Cf., e.g., Smith v. … Cf. 1000 Friends v.

Portland Canning Co. v. State Tax Commission

241 Or. 109 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1965

Neither the taxpayer nor the Washington County Assessor appealed the board’s decision. … Mallatt v. Luihn, 206 Or 678, 692 , 294 P2d 871 (1956). With this ruling this court agrees. The parties have disagreed as to which valuation the presumption of validity attends upon trial.

International Paper Co. v. Turner

304 Or. 354 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 17, 1987

We take the facts from those that are undisputed and from those found by the Court of Appeals on its judicial review on the record made before the Workers’ Compensation Board (Board). Sahnow v. Fireman’s Fund Ins. … See Smith v.

Kelly v. Multnomah County

18 Or. 356 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 14, 1890

Counsel for Multnomah county rely upon Connelly v. Dakota County, 35 Minn. 365 . … And the same remark may be made in reference to the case of Grubb v. Louisa County, 40 Iowa 314 , cited by respondent’s counsel.

Oregon v. Davis

42 Or. 34 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 12, 1903

App. 286 ( 51 Pac. 62 ); Davis v. Clark, 58 Kan. 454 ( 49 Pac. 665 ); Sonoma County v. Hall, 132 Cal. 589 ( 62 Pac. 257 , 312, 65 Pac. 12 , 459); Ware v. State, 74 Ind. 181 ; Ada County v. Ellis (Idaho), 48 Pac. 1071 . … App. 286 ( 51 Pac. 62 ); Merchants’ Bank v. Rawls, 21 Ga. 289 ; State to use v. Dailey, 4 Mo. App. 172 ; Lyle v. *40 Murray, 4 Sandf. 390 .