Case law

Doernbecher v. Columbia City Lumber Co.

21 Or. 573 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 1, 1892

(State ex rel. v. Bonnell, 35 Ohio St. 10 ; People v. Batchellor, supra; Merritt v. Ferris, 22 Ill. 303 ; Warner v. Mower, 11 Vt. 385 .) … Corp. § 279; Com. v. Cullen, 13 Pa. St. 133; 53 Am.Dec. 450; State ex rel. v. Furgeson, 31 N. J. L. 107; Harding v. Vanderwater, 40 Cal.77; Gordon v. Preston, 1 Watts, 385 ; 26 Am. Dec. 75 ; People v. Batchellor, 22 N.

Claypool v. O'Neill

65 Or. 511 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1913

In Gardner v. … This covers the only question raised by O’Neill’s objections to the findings of the board of control, and necessitates a reversal of the decree of the Circuit Court by which it is adjudged that the decree in O’Neill v.

Edwards v. Union High School District No. 8

198 Or. 611 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 3, 1953

Also see Webb v. Clatsop Co. School Dist. 3, 188 Or 324, 334 , 215 P2d 368 ; Witham v. McNutt et al., 186 Or 668 , 208 P2d 459 ; Re Application of Riggs et al., 105 Or 531, 552 , 207 P 175, 1005 , 210 P 217 ; Roesch v. … The question of the selection of a school site was duly submitted by the school board to an election held throughout the union high school district, and site No. 2 in Albany was approved by a majority vote. McBee v.

Roseburg Lumber Co. v. State Tax Commission

223 Or. 294 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 3, 1960

See State ex rel Galloway v. Watson, 167 Or 403, 118 P2d 107 . … New York v. United States, 342 US 882, 884 , 72 S Ct 152 , 153, 96 LEd 662 .

State v. Holman

73 Or. 18 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 24, 1914

That department of the state government also possessed authority to name the person who should constitute the third member of that board: *24 Biggs v. McBride, 17 Or. 640 ( 21 Pac. 878 , 5 L. R. … A. 115); State ex rel. v. George, 22 Or. 142 ( 29 Pac. 356 , 29 Am. St. Rep. 586 , 16 L. R. A. 737); Eddy v. Kincaid, 28 Or. 537 ( 41 Pac. 156 , 655); State ex rel. v. Compson, 34 Or. 25 ( 54 Pac. 349 ). 2.

School District No. 1 v. Teachers' Retirement Fund Ass'n

163 Or. 103 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 13, 1939

In Hosford v. Board of Education of City of Minneapolis, 201 Minn. 1 , 275 N. … Sherman v. Board of Trustees, 9 Cal. App. (2d) 262, 49 P. (2d) 350 .” In Moore v. Board of Education, 121 App. Div. 862 , 106 N. Y.

Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. State Tax Commission

237 Or. 143 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 18, 1964

We are aware that the review of the assessor’s work by the board of equalization ordinarily adds strength to the presumption of validity with which the assessor’s work is clothed. Southern Or. Co. v. … The taxpayer ordinarily *151 must prove that both the assessor and the board of equalization were in error before the commission can overturn the estimates of market value found by the local authorities. Case v.

Portland Lumbering & Manufacturing Co. v. School District No. 1

13 Or. 283 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 22, 1886

In Board etc. v. … And to these may be added the further later authorities: Board of Education v. Neidenberger, 78 Ill. 58 ; Thomas v. Board of Education, 71 Id. 283; Quinn *287 v. Allen, 85 Id. 39; Charnock v.

Gilliam v. Schoen

176 Or. 356 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 6, 1945

Brown v. Hilleary, 133 Or. 26 , 286 P. 593 . … Brown v. Hilleary, supra; Ramstead v. Bridges, supra. Mr.

SAIF Corp. v. Stephen

308 Or. 41 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 31, 1989

The Board reversed the award of TTD on the basis of Cutright v. … In Cutright v.

Carlson v. Portland Railway, Light & Power Co.

121 Or. 519 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1927

See Anderson v. Wallowa Nat. Bank, 100 Or. 679, 700 ( 198 Pac. 560 ), cited by defendant. … J., and Brown and Belt, JJ., concur.

Sekermestrovich v. State Accident Insurance Fund

280 Or. 723 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 28, 1977

The Workmen’s Compensation Board denied compensation after de novo review of the record on the ground that claimant had not shown *726 good cause under the statute. The Board did not reach the merits. … Brand v. Baker, 42 Or 426, 434 , 71 P 320 (1903). See Carlson v. Bankers Discount Corp. et al, 107 Or 686 , 215 P 986 (1923); Longyear, Admx. v. Edwards, 217 Or 314 , 342 P2d 762 (1959).

Northwestern Clearance Co. v. Jennings

106 Or. 291 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 27, 1922

Counsel for the motion cite and rely upon the cases of Williams v. Schmidt, 14 Or. 470, 471 ( 13 Pac. 305 ), and Muckle v. Columbia County, 56 Or. 146 ( 108 Pac. 120 ). … J., and Brown and Harris, JJ., concur.

Sheard v. Oregon Electric Railway Co.

131 Or. 415 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 3, 1929

Brown & McCabe, 67 Or. 310, 319 ( 134 P. 1186 ) Coates v. Marion County, 96 Or. 334, 340 ( 189 P. 903 ). … Brown and Belt, JJ., not sitting.

School Dist. No. 4 v. Hartong

89 Or. 155 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 18, 1918

The law is fundamental and is so decided by this court in the case of Stephens v. … This principle has been followed by numerous decisions of this court, including the case of Hughey v. Smith, 65 Or. 323 ( 133 Pac. 68 ), in which they are all collated and approved.

Christensen v. Marvin

273 Or. 97 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 9, 1975

In Lee v. Paulsen, decided this date, we held that the plaintiff teacher could not recover for defamation. … Williams v. School District of Springfield R-12, 447 SW 2d 256 (Mo 1969), quoted illustration 2 and decided for the school district.

Doyle v. Chladek

240 Or. 598 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 21, 1965

Black v. Sippy, 15 Or 574, 576 , 16 P 418 ; Johnston v. Barrills, 27 Or 251, 256 , 41 P 656 ; Clarke-Woodward Drug Co. v. Hot Lake Sanitorium Co., 75 Or 234, 238 , 146 P 135 ; Permick v. … Black v. Sippy, supra, at 576 .

Rector of St. David's v. Wood

24 Or. 396 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 17, 1893

Ainsley, 2 Brown, Ch. 341, “that if one person would not build, another might be found who would,” and for the reason given by Lord Thurlow in Lucas v. … Justice Miller in Ross v. U. P. R. R.

State v. Milbradt

305 Or. 621 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 17, 1988

Brown, 297 Or 404 , 687 P2d 751 (1984). … In State v. Middleton, this court allowed in testimony concerning normal reactions to abuse but did so before we decided State u. Brown.

Or. & Cal. R. R. v. Lane County

23 Or. 386 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 9, 1893

Bank v. Jordan, 16 Or. 115 ( 17 Pac. Rep. 621 ). 3. … In Railroad Co. v.