Case law

Nicholson v. Jones

194 Or. 406 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 26, 1952

Creecy v. Joy, supra, 40 Or 33 . … In Maxwell Co. v. So. Ore.

Gage v. Maass

306 Or. 196 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 26, 1988

The record also presents questions about proper procedure in habeas corpus proceedings in the two kinds of cases described in Penrod/Brown v. … For this he relies on the language quoted above from Penrod/Brown v. Cupp, supra. Want of a timely remedy alone is not sufficient.

Oregon Steam Navigation Co. v. Wasco County

2 Or. 206 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1867

In Patten v. … Co. v. City of Portland, 2 Oregon R. ; Col. Life Ins. Co. v. Supervisors, &c., 21 Barb., 166 .) The assessment roll becomes a record subject only to statutory alterations.

Gwynn v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.

304 Or. 345 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 17, 1987

Gwynn v. SAIF, 84 Or App 67, 69 , 733 P2d 895 (1987). We take as facts those that are undisputed or found by the Court of Appeals. Sahnow v. Fireman’s Fund Ins. Co., 260 Or 564, 568-69 , 491 P2d 997 (1971). … See Harwell v. Argonaut Insurance Co., 296 Or 505, 509-11 , 678 P2d 1202 (1984); Weller v. Union Carbide, 288 Or 27, 34-35 , 602 P2d 259 (1979).

Glerum v. Roberts

308 Or. 22 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 26, 1989

Reed v. Roberts, 304 Or 649, 652 , 748 P2d 542 (1988). In 1987, the legislature amended ORS 250.035 to its present form. See Reed v. Roberts, supra, 304 Or at 653 . … Reed v. Roberts, supra, 304 Or at 652-53 .

State v. Combs

169 Or. 566 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 23, 1942

As was well said in State Board of Pharmacy v. Matthews, 197 N. Y. 353 , 90 N. E. 966 , 26 L. R. A., N. … In State v.

Wells v. Wood

125 Or. 38 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 9, 1927

Paul Trust Co. v. Strong , 85 Minn. 1 ( 88 N.W. 256 ); Baker v. Springfield Western Missouri Ry. Co. , 86 Mo. 75 ; Irwin v. Sample , 213 Ill. 160 , 168 , 169 ( 72 N.E. 687 ); Luff v. Lord , 34 Beav. 220, 226 (56 Eng. … McBRIDE, BROWN and BELT, JJ., concurring.

State Ex Rel. Robeson v. Oregon State Bar

291 Or. 505 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 14, 1981

We see nothing in the requirement to provide security for clients that would “unduly burden or substantially interfere with the judiciary,” Sadler v. … For a premise for this assertion, petitioner relies on two decisions from the early years of “substantive due process,” Dent v. West Virginia, 129 US 114 , 9 S Ct 231 , 32 L Ed 623 (1889) and Douglas v.

Post v. Salem-Keizer School District

334 Or. 61 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 25, 2002

Post v. Salem-Keizer School District, 162 Or App 15 , 987 P2d 530 (1999). The Court of Appeals’ majority first concluded that petitioner was a “permanent teacher.” Id. at 22 . … * * * within 10 days * * * after receipt of notice of the district school board’s decision, notice of appeal * * 6 The court’s suggestion in Zollinger v.

State v. Sims

287 Or. 349 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 11, 1979

Green, 286 Or 99 , 593 P2d 777 (1979); Tharalson v. State Dept. of Rev., 281 Or 9 , 573 P2d 298 (1978); Brown v. Multnomah County Dist. Court, 280 Or 95 , 570 P2d 52 (1977); Deras v. … Myers, 272 Or 47 , 535 P2d 541 (1975); State v. Brown, 262 Or 442 , 497 P2d 1191 (1972); Dickman v. School Dist. 62C, 232 Or 238 , 366 P2d 533 (1962). In State v.

State Ex Rel. Dwyer v. Dwyer

299 Or. 108 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 30, 1985

Defendant relies upon Brown v. Multnomah County Dist. Ct., 280 Or 95 , 570 P2d (1977). … State v.

Hodgkin v. Boswell

63 Or. 589 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 3, 1912

Marx v. Hanthorn, 148 U. S. 180 (13 Sup. Ct. 508: 37 L. Ed. 410 ) ; Troyer v. Wood, 96 Mo. 478 ( 10 S. W. 42 : 9 Am. St. Rep. 367 ) ; State v. Griffie, 118 Mo. 188 ( 23 S. W. 878 ) ; Robson v. … Thomas, 55 Mo. 581 ; Ducommun v. Hysinger, 14 Ill. 249 ; Brown v. Marqueze & Co., 30 Tex. 77 .

Bessler v. Powder River Gold Dredg. Co.

95 Or. 271 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 2, 1919

McCormick, 18 Or. 301, 303 ( 22 Pac. 1062 ); Ambrose v. Huntington, 34 Or. 484, 489 ( 56 Pac. 513 ); West v. Edwards, 41 Or. 609, 614 ( 69 Pac. 992 ); Bessler v. … Va. 238 ; Jackson v. Spear, 7 Wend. (N. Y.) 401; Williams v. Snidow, 4 Leigh (Va.), 14 ; Gay v. Moffit, 2 Bibb. (Ky.) 506 ( 5 Am. Dec. 633 ); Keys v. Mason, 44 Tex. 140 ; Pratt v. Caufield, 67 Mo. 50 .

State v. Williams

322 Or. 620 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 8, 1996

See also Dowling v. … See, e.g., State v. Brown, 310 Or 347, 355 , 800 P2d 259 (1990) (applying rule). No error apparent on the face of the record is presented here.

Barrett v. D & H DRYWALL

300 Or. 325 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 26, 1985

The Court of Appeals first reversed the Board and then, on reconsideration, affirmed the Board. 70 Or App 123 , 688 P2d 130 (1984), 73 Or App 184 , 698 P2d 498 (1985). … Wheeler v. Boise Cascade, 298 Or 452, 457 , 693 P2d 632 (1984); Weller v. Union Carbide, supra, 288 Or at 29 ; Sahnow v. Fireman’s Fund Ins.

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. City of Central Point

341 Or. 393 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 28, 2006

Fifth Avenue Corp. v. … In Ludwick v.

Smith v. Silverton

71 Or. 379 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 7, 1914

The statute creating the state board of health (Section 4693, L. O. … See, also, Hutchinson v. Delano, 46 Kan. 345 ( 26 Pac. 740 ); Newark Aqueduct Board v. Passaic, 46 N. J. Eq. 552 ( 20 Atl. 54 , 22 Atl. 55 ); Parker and Worthington, Health and Safety, §§ 183, 184, 221.

McManus v. Skoko

255 Or. 374 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 8, 1970

The circuit court held that the applicable statute required the board to approve the petition to incorporate as presented or with altered boundaries as determined by the board and to call an election thereon. … See State v. Bay City, 65 Or 124 , 131 P 1038 (1913).

Ollilo v. Clatskanie Peoples' Utility District

170 Or. 173 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 1, 1942

Mississippi Power & Light Co. v. Town of Batesville, 187 Miss. 737 , 193 So. 814 ; Thomas v. McHugh, 65 N. D. 149 , 256 N. W. 763 ; State ex rel. v. Snyder, 129 Ohio State 206 , 194 N. … In the case of Weathers v. Todd County, 271 Ky. 172 , 111 S.

Rector of St. David's v. Wood

24 Or. 396 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 17, 1893

Ainsley, 2 Brown, Ch. 341, “that if one person would not build, another might be found who would,” and for the reason given by Lord Thurlow in Lucas v. … Justice Miller in Ross v. U. P. R. R.