Case law

In Re Monaco

317 Or. 366 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 5, 1993

On January 5, 1990, the Board of Bar Examiners (Board) filed an opinion and recommendation with this court that the Applicant not be admitted to practice law in Oregon. … Konigsberg v. State Bar of California, 366 US 36, 41 , 81 S Ct 997 , 6 L Ed 2d 105 (1961). We are not convinced that a different conclusion should apply under the Oregon rule.

State v. Clark

291 Or. 231 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 23, 1981

Holman, supra , held that a board of commissioners had violated article I, section 20, in denying petitioners a license to maintain a sailors' boarding house because the board had not used objective standards for selecting … Sterling v. Cupp, 290 Or. 611 , 625 P.2d 123 (1981), note 1 and cases there cited, Megdal v. Board of Dental Examiners, 288 Or. 293, 296 , 605 P.2d 273 (1980).

Oregon Steam Navigation Co. v. Wasco County

2 Or. 206 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1867

In Patten v. … Co. v. City of Portland, 2 Oregon R. ; Col. Life Ins. Co. v. Supervisors, &c., 21 Barb., 166 .) The assessment roll becomes a record subject only to statutory alterations.

Doernbecher v. Columbia City Lumber Co.

21 Or. 573 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 1, 1892

(State ex rel. v. Bonnell, 35 Ohio St. 10 ; People v. Batchellor, supra; Merritt v. Ferris, 22 Ill. 303 ; Warner v. Mower, 11 Vt. 385 .) … Corp. § 279; Com. v. Cullen, 13 Pa. St. 133; 53 Am.Dec. 450; State ex rel. v. Furgeson, 31 N. J. L. 107; Harding v. Vanderwater, 40 Cal.77; Gordon v. Preston, 1 Watts, 385 ; 26 Am. Dec. 75 ; People v. Batchellor, 22 N.

State v. Combs

169 Or. 566 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 23, 1942

As was well said in State Board of Pharmacy v. Matthews, 197 N. Y. 353 , 90 N. E. 966 , 26 L. R. A., N. … In State v.

Doherty v. Harris Pine Mills, Inc.

211 Or. 378 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 6, 1957

“Tract 1. 12 — 40’s (described) — 434,000 board feet of pine “Tract 2. 6 — 40’s (described) — 1,015,000 board feet of pine “Tract 3. 12 — 40’s (described) — 1,505,000 board feet of pine “Tract!. … of 800,000 board feet.

Boehmer v. Silvestone

95 Or. 154 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 10, 1918

It is settled by the case of Dowell v. … Kendricks for board, etc.................................. 61.90 November, 1914, T. B.

Arken v. City of Portland

351 Or. 113 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 6, 2011

Co. v. … al. v.

School District No. 1 v. Teachers' Retirement Fund Ass'n

163 Or. 103 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 13, 1939

In Hosford v. Board of Education of City of Minneapolis, 201 Minn. 1 , 275 N. … Sherman v. Board of Trustees, 9 Cal. App. (2d) 262, 49 P. (2d) 350 .” In Moore v. Board of Education, 121 App. Div. 862 , 106 N. Y.

Gage v. Maass

306 Or. 196 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 26, 1988

The record also presents questions about proper procedure in habeas corpus proceedings in the two kinds of cases described in Penrod/Brown v. … For this he relies on the language quoted above from Penrod/Brown v. Cupp, supra. Want of a timely remedy alone is not sufficient.

State v. Holman

73 Or. 18 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 24, 1914

That department of the state government also possessed authority to name the person who should constitute the third member of that board: *24 Biggs v. McBride, 17 Or. 640 ( 21 Pac. 878 , 5 L. R. … A. 115); State ex rel. v. George, 22 Or. 142 ( 29 Pac. 356 , 29 Am. St. Rep. 586 , 16 L. R. A. 737); Eddy v. Kincaid, 28 Or. 537 ( 41 Pac. 156 , 655); State ex rel. v. Compson, 34 Or. 25 ( 54 Pac. 349 ). 2.

Hillman v. Young

64 Or. 73 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 26, 1912

Booth v. Moody, 30 Or. 222 ( 46 Pac. 884 ); Brown v. Feldwert, 46 Or. 363 ( 80 Pac. 414 ); Bade v. Hibberd, 50 Or. 501 ( 93 Pac. 364 ). … In Gardner v.

Robertson v. Low

44 Or. 587 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 1, 1904

This court has virtually decided in Robertson v. … In further support of the principle, see State v. Emmert, 19 Kan. 546 ; Ewing v. Baldwin, 24 Kan. 82 ; Baker v. Newland, 25 Kan. 25 ; Reynolds v. Reynolds, 30 Kan. 91 ( 1 Pac. 388 ); Conklin v. Hawthorn, 29 Wis. 476 .

State ex rel. Compass Corp. v. City of Lake Oswego

319 Or. 537 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 11, 1994

Relying on the rationale of Edney v. … Edney v. Columbia County Board of Commissioners, supra, 318 Or at 144 .

State v. Evans

82 Or. 46 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 10, 1916

The district boundary board did not make an express finding that the petition was in fact signed by one third of the legal voters, nor is it shown or even claimed that the board had any evidence of the number of legal voters … of State v.

Smith v. Silverton

71 Or. 379 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 7, 1914

The statute creating the state board of health (Section 4693, L. O. … See, also, Hutchinson v. Delano, 46 Kan. 345 ( 26 Pac. 740 ); Newark Aqueduct Board v. Passaic, 46 N. J. Eq. 552 ( 20 Atl. 54 , 22 Atl. 55 ); Parker and Worthington, Health and Safety, §§ 183, 184, 221.

Gwynn v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.

304 Or. 345 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 17, 1987

Gwynn v. SAIF, 84 Or App 67, 69 , 733 P2d 895 (1987). We take as facts those that are undisputed or found by the Court of Appeals. Sahnow v. Fireman’s Fund Ins. Co., 260 Or 564, 568-69 , 491 P2d 997 (1971). … See Harwell v. Argonaut Insurance Co., 296 Or 505, 509-11 , 678 P2d 1202 (1984); Weller v. Union Carbide, 288 Or 27, 34-35 , 602 P2d 259 (1979).

State Ex Rel. Robeson v. Oregon State Bar

291 Or. 505 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 14, 1981

We see nothing in the requirement to provide security for clients that would “unduly burden or substantially interfere with the judiciary,” Sadler v. … For a premise for this assertion, petitioner relies on two decisions from the early years of “substantive due process,” Dent v. West Virginia, 129 US 114 , 9 S Ct 231 , 32 L Ed 623 (1889) and Douglas v.

Glerum v. Roberts

308 Or. 22 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 26, 1989

Reed v. Roberts, 304 Or 649, 652 , 748 P2d 542 (1988). In 1987, the legislature amended ORS 250.035 to its present form. See Reed v. Roberts, supra, 304 Or at 653 . … Reed v. Roberts, supra, 304 Or at 652-53 .

State v. Williams

322 Or. 620 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 8, 1996

See also Dowling v. … See, e.g., State v. Brown, 310 Or 347, 355 , 800 P2d 259 (1990) (applying rule). No error apparent on the face of the record is presented here.