Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersor

8,515 results

0.90s

  • State v. Kelsey

    66 Or. 70 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1913

    Corp. (5 ed.), § 572; Clinton v. Portland, 26 Or. 410 ( 38 Pac. 407 ). 3. … Corp’. (5 ed.), § 571; Municipality No. 1 v. Cutting, 4 La. Ann. 335 . 5.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Pennoyer v. Willis

    26 Or. 1 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 19, 1894

    Railway Company, 24 Wis. 157 ; Roach v. Karr, 18 Kan. 529 . … so doing would be binding upon the board.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Cain v. Woolley Enterprises

    301 Or. 650 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 3, 1986

    The Court of Appeals denied claimant’s motion to have the court either hear the evidence or remand to the referee and affirmed the Board without opinion. We allowed review in this case and in Compton v. … The court denied claimant’s motion and affirmed the Board without opinion. As we said in Compton v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • McBee v. School District No. 48

    163 Or. 121 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 14, 1939

    See also Landers v. Van Aukin, supra. … In the following recent cases it was held applicable to school boards: Beers v. Lasher, 209 Iowa 1158 , 229 N. W. 821 ; Fleming v. Board of Trustees, 112 Cal. App. 225 , 296 P. 925 .

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Russell v. State Accident Insurance Fund

    281 Or. 353 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 14, 1978

    See Zuza v. Ford Motor Company, 84 NJ Super 588, 203 A2d 105 (1964), aff’d 44 NJ 320, 208 A2d 802 (1965); Englishman v. … . *360 See also Dodier v. State Dept. of Labor, 373 A2d 341 (NH 1977); Webb v. Hamilton, 78 NM 647 , 436 P2d 507 (1968).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Johnson v. State Accident Insurance Fund

    267 Or. 299 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 13, 1973

    Both the board and the circuit court held for petitioner on the merits and awarded attorney’s fees. … are not recoverable in such proceedings because the Injured Inmates Act does not provide for them within the Act itself nor by incorporation of the attorney’s fees provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Act. ① Johnson v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • M & M Woodworking Co. v. State Tax Commission

    217 Or. 161 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 27, 1959

    In *183 this instance the taxpayers appealed to the Board of Equalization for Multnomah County and that board sustained the value as fixed by the assessor. … Bank v. Board of Equalization, 109 Or 669 , 222 P 341 , is a similar case.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • James v. Clackamas County

    353 Or. 431 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 11, 2013

    Plaintiff is charged with the knowledge of the content of the Board order. An order of the Board of Commissioners can only be modif[ied] by action of the Board. … The assertion that only the board could modify its prior orders is not the same thing as a concession that the board had modified its contract with plaintiff. See Bennett v. Farmers Ins.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • International Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's Union v. Harvey Aluminum

    226 Or. 94 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 8, 1961

    The following cases support the view of the National Labor Relations Board: NLRB v. Carpenters Local 176, 276 F2d 582 (1st Cir 1960) and Teamsters Local 357 v. NLRB, 275 F2d 646 (DC Cir 1960). … For an informative discussion of the effect of the Garmon case in this field, see Grunwald-Marx, Inc. v. L. A. Joint Board, 52 Cal2d 568, 343 P2d 23 .

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Jackson v. Nicolai-Neppach Co.

    219 Or. 560 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 31, 1959

    Reid Drug Co. v. Salyer, 268 Ky 522, 105 SW2d 625 (1937); Bowman v. Gum, Inc., 321 Pa 516, 184 A 258 (1936); see Cook v. Cook, 270 Mass 534, 170 NE 455 (1930); Hammond v. Hammond, 216 SW2d 630 (Tex Civ App 1948). … Lush’us Brand Distributors v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Hansen v. Oregon Humane Society

    142 Or. 104 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 1, 1933

    of the board present at any meeting”. … In Wells v.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Glines v. Bain

    157 Or. 358 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 16, 1937

    How would the board of directors acquire $335,000 without transferring, in violation of the statute, funds which had been budgeted for a particular purpose? Appellants strongly rely upon Stoddard, v. … Tuttle v. Beem, 144 Or. 145 ( 24 P. (2d) 12 ), is also cited by appellants. That case involved the liabilities of a third class district for the digging of a well. Teachers ’ salaries were not involved.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Umatilla County v. Bowman

    155 Or. 49 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 26, 1936

    The Eagle Point case has been cited with approval by this court in the later cases of State Land Board v. Campbell, 140 Or. 196 ( 13 P. (2d) 346 ), and State v. … This question is answered adversely to appellant and in favor of the irrigation district in State Land Board v. Davidson, supra.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Zottola v. Three Rivers School District

    342 Or. 118 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 21, 2006

    FDAB then reviewed two Court of Appeals cases that it found to be dispositive: Filter v. City of Vernonia, 95 Or App 550 , 770 P2d 83 (1989), and German Auto Parts v. … The order of the Fair Dismissal Appeals Board is remanded to the Fair Dismissal Appeals Board for modification in accordance with this opinion.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Thompson v. Multnomah County

    2 Or. 34 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1861

    In Rice et al. v. Parkman, 16 Mass., 326 , the question arose whether an act of the legislature was judicial in its nature, and therefore in conflict, with the Constitution. … So in Regina v. Overseers of Salvord, 11 E. L., and E. R., 145, which was a certiorari to a board of inland revenue that had issued a license for the sale of beer.

    Cited 27 timesPublished
  • State v. Haugen

    Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 30, 2017

    State v. Haugen, 274 Or App 127, 360 P3d 560 (2015). … State v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Parmentier v. Ransom

    179 Or. 17 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 17, 1946

    Lyons v. Browning, 170 Or. 350, 354 , 133 P. (2d) 599 . The com *23 ment quoted from Lyons v. … Timmins v. Hale, 122 Or. 24 , 256 P.770; Seipp v. Howells, 146 Or. 637 , 31 P. (2d) 188 ; Lyons v. Browning, supra; King v. Ditto, 142 Or. 207 , 19 P. (2d) 1100 .

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Ainsworth

    289 Or. 479 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 23, 1980

    Both the Trial Board and the Disciplinary Review Board found the accused to be not guilty of this charge. … See Megdal v.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Finnegan v. Pacific Vinegar Co.

    26 Or. 152 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 30, 1894

    Idaho Stage Company, 25 Or. 412 , 36 Pac. 24 ,) and such ratification need not be by a formal vote or resolution of the board of directors: Campbell v. Pope, 96 Mo. 468 , 10 S. W. 187 . … James Parish v. Newburyport Horse Railroad, 141 Mass. 500 , 6 N. E. 749 ; Jourdan v. Long Island Railroad Company, 115 N. Y. 380 , 22 N E. 153.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Minniti v. Cascade Emp. Ass'n, Inc.

    280 Or. 319 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 8, 1977

    Bahler v. Fletcher, 257 Or 1, 19-20 , 474 P2d 329 (1970). … Alldrin v. Lucas, 260 Or 373, 381 , 490 P2d 141 (1971).

    Cited 12 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.