Case law

Graham v. School District

33 Or. 263 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 13, 1898

In Athearn v. … This doctrine was reaffirmed in Cook v. Independent School Dist., 40 Iowa, 444 . A like doctrine was held in Crane v. Bennington School Dist., 61 Mich. 299 ( 28 N.

Wood v. Lost Lake Manufacturing Co.

23 Or. 20 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 4, 1890

In Lone Association v. Stonemetz, 29 Pa. … Co. v. Ketcham, 27 Conn. 170 .

Be Boest v. Gambell

35 Or. 368 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 31, 1899

So, also, in People ex rel. v. Board of Police, 75 N. Y. 38 , the relator was appointed police surgeon by the board of police, under a resolution which fixed his salary at $1,500 per annum. … See, also, to the same effect, People ex rel. v. French, 91 N. Y. 265 ; Board v. City of Decatur, 64 Tex. 7 ( 53 Am. Rep. 735 ); State v. Mayor of Nashville, 15 Lea, 697 ( 54 Am. Rep. 427 ).

OREGON AFL-CIO v. Weldon

256 Or. 307 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 17, 1970

Johnson v. City of Astoria et al, 227 Or 585, 591-592 , 363 P2d 571 (1961); Unlimited Progress v. Portland, 213 Or 193 , 324 P2d 239 (1958); State ex rel Stadter v. … In Unlimited Progress v.

Civil Rights Division of Bureau of Labor v. Williams

280 Or. 595 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 20, 1977

The court said, citing Phillips v. … Fairview Hospital v. Stanton, 28 Or App 643 , 560 P2d 667 (1977), overruled Thompson v. Secretary of State, 19 Or App 74 , 526 P2d 621 (1974), and Phillips v.

In re North Powder River

75 Or. 83 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 10, 1914

And in Hough v. … Whited v. Cavin, 55 Or. 98 ( 105 Pac. 396 ), Williams v.

International Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's Union v. Harvey Aluminum

226 Or. 94 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 8, 1961

The following cases support the view of the National Labor Relations Board: NLRB v. Carpenters Local 176, 276 F2d 582 (1st Cir 1960) and Teamsters Local 357 v. NLRB, 275 F2d 646 (DC Cir 1960). … For an informative discussion of the effect of the Garmon case in this field, see Grunwald-Marx, Inc. v. L. A. Joint Board, 52 Cal2d 568, 343 P2d 23 .

James v. Clackamas County

353 Or. 431 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 11, 2013

Plaintiff is charged with the knowledge of the content of the Board order. An order of the Board of Commissioners can only be modif[ied] by action of the Board. … The assertion that only the board could modify its prior orders is not the same thing as a concession that the board had modified its contract with plaintiff. See Bennett v. Farmers Ins.

State of Oregon Ex Rel. v. Dobson

195 Or. 533 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 4, 1952

were approved in NLBR v. … Starr v. Laundry Union, 155 Or. 634 , 63 P. (2d) 1104 ; Wallace v. International Ass’n of Mechanics, supra; Schwab v.

1000 Friends v. Land Conservation & Development Commission

303 Or. 430 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 27, 1987

LCDC (Union County), 77 Or App 728 , 714 P2d 283 (1986)(per curiam); 1000 Friends of Oregon v. LCDC (Columbia Co.), 77 Or App 728 , 714 P2d 283 (1986)(per curiam); 1000 Friends of Oregon v. LCDC (Wash. … While ORS 527.726, then HB 3008, was before the Senate Committee on Agriculture and Natural Resources, Senators Brown and Kulongoski drafted a minority report adding the following language: “(4) Upon approval by the Land

Hensler v. City of Portland

212 Or. 28 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 13, 1957

Kosmecki *34 v. Portland Stevedoring Co., 190 Or 85 , 223 P2d 1035 ; Johnson v. Timber Structures, Inc., 203 Or 670 , 281 P2d 723 . In all these cases except Brown v. … Brown v. Underwood Lumber Co., 172 Or at 267 .

Inkley v. Forest Fiber Products Co.

288 Or. 337 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 22, 1980

The Workers’ Compensation Board (WCB) held, however, that neither the employer nor SAIF is liable, and the Court of Appeals affirmed without opinion. Inkley v. … The Court of Appeals in Gronquist v.

Timber Access Industries Co. v. U. S. Plywood-Champion Papers, Inc.

263 Or. 509 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 24, 1972

Merriam Co. v. Syndicate Pub. … In Dallas County v.

State v. Kelsey

66 Or. 70 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1913

Corp. (5 ed.), § 572; Clinton v. Portland, 26 Or. 410 ( 38 Pac. 407 ). 3. … Corp’. (5 ed.), § 571; Municipality No. 1 v. Cutting, 4 La. Ann. 335 . 5.

Pennoyer v. Willis

26 Or. 1 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 19, 1894

Railway Company, 24 Wis. 157 ; Roach v. Karr, 18 Kan. 529 . … so doing would be binding upon the board.

Bacon v. HARRIS

221 Or. 553 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 11, 1960

Although it is not named as a defendant we think this is, in legal effect, an action against the State Board of Higher Education and will so treat it. See State ex rel Kleinsorge v. … We have recently held in James & Yost, Inc. v. State Board of *557 Higher Edu., 216 Or 598 , 340 P2d 577 , that the state of Oregon has not waived its immunity as to the State Board of Higher Education.

Buell v. Jefferson County Court

175 Or. 402 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 20, 1944

Arant v. Lane, supra; Duncan Townsite Company v. Lane, supra; Duke v. Turner, 204 U. S. 623 , 51 L. E. 652, 27 S. Ct. 316 , 9 Ann. Cas. 842; Board of Education v. … Board of Education v.

Hansen v. Oregon Humane Society

142 Or. 104 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 1, 1933

of the board present at any meeting”. … In Wells v.

McBee v. School District No. 48

163 Or. 121 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 14, 1939

See also Landers v. Van Aukin, supra. … In the following recent cases it was held applicable to school boards: Beers v. Lasher, 209 Iowa 1158 , 229 N. W. 821 ; Fleming v. Board of Trustees, 112 Cal. App. 225 , 296 P. 925 .

Russell v. State Accident Insurance Fund

281 Or. 353 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 14, 1978

See Zuza v. Ford Motor Company, 84 NJ Super 588, 203 A2d 105 (1964), aff’d 44 NJ 320, 208 A2d 802 (1965); Englishman v. … . *360 See also Dodier v. State Dept. of Labor, 373 A2d 341 (NH 1977); Webb v. Hamilton, 78 NM 647 , 436 P2d 507 (1968).