Case law

City of Roseburg v. Roseburg City Firefighters, Local No. 1489

292 Or. 266 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 29, 1981

See, e.g., Town of Arlington v. Board of Concil. & Arbit., 370 Mass. 769 , 352 N.E.2d 914, 920-921 (1976); City of Amsterdam v. … (Emphasis added) [9] Note 15 of "the original opinion" is as follows: " E.G., Brown v. City of Salem, 251 Or. 150 , 444 P.2d 936 (1968); Bennet v.

Portland v. Traynor

94 Or. 418 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 16, 1919

To do this plenary power is vested under the city charter and the execution of that power is vested in the board of health. In Lieberman v. Van De Car, 199 U. S. 552 ( 50 L. Ed. 305 , 26 Sup. Ct. … In State v.

Hicks v. Schrunk

238 Or. 181 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 8, 1964

As required by the Charter the Board accepted the physicians’ findings and denied the application. The facts in the instant case are quite similar to those in Mundt v. Peterson et al, 1957, 211 Or 293 , 315 P2d 589 . … The case is governed by Mundt v. Peterson, et al, supra, and by Miller v. Schrunk et al, 1962, 232 Or 383 , 375 P2d 823 , and Baker v. Steele et al, 1962, 229 Or 498 , 366 P2d 726 . The judgment must be affirmed.

State Ex Rel. v. Port of Cascade Locks

169 Or. 197 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 16, 1942

Watt v. … Brown v. Bailey, 151 Or. 496 , 51 P. (2d) 671 . The respondents cite these cases and rely upon them as determinative of the questions raised in this proceeding.

Campbell v. Aldrich

159 Or. 208 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 31, 1938

The New Jersey court (Phelps v. Board of Education, 115 N. J. … Note the distinction which the court makes in the Brand case between that and Phelps v. Board of Education, supra. Groves v. Board of Education, 367 Ill. 91 (10 N.

Farmers Insurance Group v. SAIF Corp.

301 Or. 612 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 3, 1986

SAIF filed a request for review with the Workers’ Compensation Board (Board) on June 3, 1983. Farmers moved to dismiss the request for review insofar as untimely. The Board denied the motion to dismiss. … Chisholm v. SAIF, 26 Or App 627, 631 , 553 P2d 1083 (1976) (Schwab, C.J., dissenting). (Emphasis supplied.) *618 Farmers asserts that the rüle of Chisholm governs the present case.

Godfrey v. Douglas County

28 Or. 446 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 13, 1896

In Tompkins v. … In Becker v.

State v. Morgan

316 Or. 553 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 17, 1993

State v. Morgan, 116 Or App 338, 345 , 842 P2d 406 (1992). We affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals, in part on different grounds. … See State v. Davis, 315 Or 484, 486-88 , 847 P2d 834 (1993), for an explanation of the system. A sentenced defendant serves the time, with no early release on parole other than for good time served.

Pennoyer v. Willis

26 Or. 1 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 19, 1894

Railway Company, 24 Wis. 157 ; Roach v. Karr, 18 Kan. 529 . … so doing would be binding upon the board.

Russell v. State Accident Insurance Fund

281 Or. 353 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 14, 1978

See Zuza v. Ford Motor Company, 84 NJ Super 588, 203 A2d 105 (1964), aff’d 44 NJ 320, 208 A2d 802 (1965); Englishman v. … . *360 See also Dodier v. State Dept. of Labor, 373 A2d 341 (NH 1977); Webb v. Hamilton, 78 NM 647 , 436 P2d 507 (1968).

Cavins v. State Accident Insurance Fund

272 Or. 162 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 30, 1975

Eeversed and remanded. ① Respondent’s petition lor review was denied March 27, 1975. ② Cavins v. SAIF, 20 Or App 361 , 531 P2d 746 (1975). ③ Peterson v. … Compensation Department, 257 Or 369 , 477 P2d 216 (1970). ④ Wait v. Montgomery Ward, Inc., 10 Or App 333 , 499 P2d 1340 , Pet.

Jackson v. Nicolai-Neppach Co.

219 Or. 560 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 31, 1959

Reid Drug Co. v. Salyer, 268 Ky 522, 105 SW2d 625 (1937); Bowman v. Gum, Inc., 321 Pa 516, 184 A 258 (1936); see Cook v. Cook, 270 Mass 534, 170 NE 455 (1930); Hammond v. Hammond, 216 SW2d 630 (Tex Civ App 1948). … Lush’us Brand Distributors v.

State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. Casteel

301 Or. 151 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 20, 1986

Claimant requested review by this court, and we modified the Board’s order and granted claimant an award of 50 percent unscheduled permanent partial disability.” SAIF v. Casteel, 74 Or App 566, 568, 703 P2d 1039 (1985). … The Court of Appeals agreed with the Board that “there was an aggravation of the back condition” but modified the award to 50 percent disability. Casteel v. SAIF, 55 Or App 474, 477 , 638 P2d 1165 (1982).

McCallum v. Gray

273 Or. 617 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 28, 1975

542 P.2d 1025 (1975) Donald V. McCallum, Appellant, v. John D. GRAY, Respondent. Supreme Court of Oregon. Argued and Submitted July 7, 1975. Decided November 28, 1975. *1026 Donald V. … See Baker v. Commercial Body Builders, 264 Or. 614, 626-27 , 507 P.2d 387 (1973); Browning v. C & C Plywood Corp., 248 Or. 574 , 434 P.2d 339 (1968).

State v. Stevens

328 Or. 116 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 17, 1998

See Ritchie v. … Brown, 297 Or at 417 . As this court later stated in State v.

State v. MacNab

334 Or. 469 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 15, 2002

See Kansas v. … See Dean v.

Richards v. City of Portland

121 Or. 340 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 30, 1927

As stated in Spear v. … J., and Bean and Brown, JJ., concur.

Portland Fish Co. v. Benson

56 Or. 147 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 12, 1910

Justice Moore in State v. … It is said in Bryan v.

M & M Woodworking Co. v. State Tax Commission

217 Or. 161 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 27, 1959

In *183 this instance the taxpayers appealed to the Board of Equalization for Multnomah County and that board sustained the value as fixed by the assessor. … Bank v. Board of Equalization, 109 Or 669 , 222 P 341 , is a similar case.

Barr v. World Keepfresh Co.

77 Or. 95 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 20, 1915

Co. v. Washburn, 29 *98 Or. 150, 164 ( 44 Pac. 390 ); Allen v. Elwert, 29 Ór. 428, 444 ( 44 Pac. 823 , 48 Pac. 54 ); 2 Jones on Liens, § 1419; Hughes v. Lansing, 34 Or. 118, 124 ( 55 Pac. 95 , 75 Am. St. … Lybrandt v.