Case law

Elmore Packing Co. v. Tillamook County

55 Or. 218 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 28, 1909

.; Southern Oregon Co. v. Coos Co., 30 Or. 250 ( 47 Pac. 852 ) ; Fisher v. Union County, 43 Or. 223 ( 72 Pac. 797 ) ; Holmes v. Cole, 51 Or. 483 ( 94 Pac. 964 .) 2. … City of Portland, 25 Or. 297 ( 35 Pac. 665 ) ; Oregon Coal Co. v. Coos Bay, 30 Or. 308 ( 47 Pac. 850 .) 5. As stated in Garnsey v.

Roberts v. TriQuint Semiconductor, Inc.

Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 10, 2015

CTS Corp. v. … Ross v.

Riggs v. Polk County

51 Or. 509 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 14, 1908

RIGGS v. POLK COUNTY. [95 Pac. 5.] Corporations — Members — Meetings — Calling Meetings — Persons Making Call. 1. … school board.

Stone Logging & Contracting Co. v. International Woodworkers

171 Or. 13 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 19, 1943

National Labor Relations Board v. Mason Mfg. Co., 126 F. (2d) 810, February 13, 1942. … National Labor Relations Board v. Remington Rand, Inc., supra, 94 F. 2d at page 869 . ’ ’ National Labor Relations Board v. Dahlstrom Metallic Door Go., 112 F. (2d) 756, June 17, 1940.

Stackpole v. School District No. 5

9 Or. 508 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1881

But before the board of directors can audit a claim and draw their order on the clerk for the amount, the claim must have been presented to them'. … (Forbes v. School District, 10 Wis., 118 .)

Padberg v. Martin

225 Or. 135 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 23, 1960

No. 68 v. Hoskins et al, 1952, 194 Or 301, 311 , 240 P2d 949 . See also, Monaghan v. School District No. 1, 1957, 211 Or 360 , 315 P2d 797 . … Dailey v. New Haven, 60 Conn 314, 319, 22 A 945, 14 LRS 69. * * *” School District No. 17 v. Powell, 1955, 203 Or 168, 191 , 279 P2d 492 .

State Ex Rel. Eckles v. Woolley

302 Or. 37 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 7, 1986

In Cook v. … In a suit by creditors of a private association which had conveyed land to the board for a site for the university, Dunn v.

Baxter v. Davis

58 Or. 109 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 20, 1910

A board of school directors can exercise no other powers than those expressly granted by the statute, and such as may be necessary to carry into effect a granted power: 85 Cyc. 899; School Directors v. Wright, 43 Ill. … This has been sanctioned by the Supreme Court of California, in construing the statutes of that state, which are of the same general import as our own: People v.

McDermid v. Bourhill

101 Or. 305 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 13, 1921

BROWN, J. John D. McDermid died in Multnomah County, Oregon, on February 21, 1920. His sole surviving heir at law was his widow, Eliza J. McDermid. … The various bequests to nephews, nieces, brother, sister, grandchildren of deceased sisters, and to the Board of Trustees of the Presbyterian Church of Moro, Oregon, are not affected in the least.

Varner v. Portland Trust Bank

210 Or. 658 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 3, 1957

Iltz v. Krieger, 104 Or 59, 65 , 202 P 409 , 206 P 550 ; Brown v. Miles, 193 Or 466, 479 , 238 P2d 761 . … Benedict v. Lee, supra ( 198 Or 387 ); Brown v. Miles, supra ( 193 Or 479 ).

Phillips v. Graves

139 Or. 336 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 19, 1931

As early as 1870 this court in Brown v. Harper, 4 Or. 89 , pointed out that the authorities treated the right to assert and perfect a mechanic’s lien as a privilege personal to the mechanic and not transferable. … Brown, Belt, Campbell and Kelly, JJ., concur.

SAIF v. Ward

369 Or. 384 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 24, 2022

The Court of Appeals affirmed the order of the Workers’ Compensation Board. SAIF v. Ward, 307 Or App 337, 347, 477 P3d 429 (2020). … As we explained in South Beach Marina, Inc. v.

Tyler v. Trustees of Tualatin Academy

14 Or. 485 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 19, 1887

being issued; that the board took no action upon the catalogues except to pay the bills therefor, as they could not come before the board as a board until the June following their publication. … Judge Fields said correctly, in Gas Co. v.

Christie v. Paulus

292 Or. 344 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 5, 1982

“Question: Shall Forestry Board’s sustained yield management policy for state timber be changed and set into law and Board be restructured? … Megdal v.

Good Samaritan Hospital & Medical Center v. United States National Bank

246 Or. 478 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 22, 1967

Church v. Adams, 4 Or 76 (1870); 1 Restatement (Second), Trusts § 119 (1959). ② Agan v. U. S. National Bank, 227 Or 619 , 363 P2d 765 (1961); Brown v. … Brown, 7 Or 285 (1879); 2 Restatement (Second), Trusts §365 (1959). ③ See Quick v. Hayter (In re Stouffer’s Trust), 188 Or 218 , 215 P2d 374 (1950); 3 Scott, Trusts § 399 (1939).

Domogalla v. Department of Revenue

283 Or. 377 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 12, 1978

Mittleman v. Commission, 2 OTR 105 (1965). A taxpayer who disagrees with the value determined by the assessor must petition the Board of Equalization for review. ORS 309.100. … Dept. of Rev., 6 OTR 454 (1976); Co-Operative Security Corp. v. Dept. of Rev., 6 OTR 419 (1976); State Finance Co. etal v. Dept. of Rev., 5 OTR 651 (1974); T & R Service v. Commission, 3 OTR 271 (1968); Mittleman v.

Shively v. Pennoyer

27 Or. 33 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 4, 1895

Hobbs, 27 Cal. 483 ; Quinn v. Kenyon, 38 Cal. 499 ; Schiefferly v. Tapie, 68 Cal. 184 ( 8 Pac. 878 ); Stewart v. Altstock, 22 Or. 182 ( 29 Pac. 553 ). 3. … These acts of the board being discretionary, its directions and decisions will not be reviewed by the courts: Corpe v. Brooks, 8 Or. 222 .

Salem Sand & Gravel Co. v. Olcott

97 Or. 253 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 31, 1920

It is true that in Springfield Milling Company v. … In State ex rel. v.

Clark v. FAZIO

191 Or. 522 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 25, 1951

Lyons v. Browning et al., 170 Or. 350, 354 , 133 P. 2d 599 ; Arthur v. Parish, 150 Or. 582 , 47 P. 2d 682 ; Trimmins v. Hale, 122 Or. 24 , 256 P. 770 . In Lyons v. Browning et al., supra, Mr. … Lyons v. Browning et al., supra; Lampa v. Hakola, 152 Or. 626, 630 , 55 P. 2d 13 ; Arthur v. Parish, supra; Karberg v. Leahy, 144 Or. 687, 692 , 26 P. 2d 56 ; Shain v.

Wade v. Amalgamated Sugar Co.

71 Or. 75 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 2, 1914

This would be compensation for the injury suffered and nothing- more: Wade v. Amalgamated Sugar Co., 65 Or. 488 ( 132 Pac. 710 ); Brown Land Co. v. Lehman, 134 Iowa, 712 ( 112 N. W. 185 , 12 L. R. A. (N. S.) 88). *77 2. … Davis, 1 Browne (Pa.), 334 . *78 4.