Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
8,515 results
1.33s
State Ex Rel. Galloway v. Watson
167 Or. 403 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 21, 1941
A.; Columbia River-Longview Bridge Co. v. Wellington, et al., 140 Or. 413 , 13 P. 2d 1075 ; People v. Pitcher, 61 Colo. 149 , 156 P. 812 , Ann. Cas. 1918D, 1185; Peninsular Power Co. v. … W. 371 ; Arkansas Tax Com. v. Turley, 185 Ark. 31 , 45 S. W. 2d 859 ; State v. Local Board, 225 Iowa 855 , 283 N. W. 87 .
Cited 9 timesPublishedTompkins v. Portland Ry., L. & P. Co.
77 Or. 174 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 27, 1915
should have been given: Zurcher v. … Supp. 490 ); Dudley v. Front Street Cable Ry. Co. (C. C.), 73 Fed. 128 ; Devroe v. Portland R., L. & P. Co., 64 Or. 547, 556 ( 131 Pac. 304 ). 3.
Cited 4 timesPublished104 Or. 600 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 29, 1922
BROWN, J. … Jasnowski v. Board of Assessors, 191 Mich. 287 ( 157 N. W. 891 ). Again, in Briedwell v.
Cited 35 timesPublished209 Or. 53 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 2, 1956
United States v. Cummings, 2d Cir 1956, 233 F2d 187; Weber v. Squier, 124 F2d 618, cert den 315 US 810 , 86 L ed 1209; Van Meter v. … Weber v. Squier, 1942, 315 U.S. 810 , 62 S.Ct. 800 , 86 L.Ed. 1209 ; McNally v. Hill, 1934, 293 U.S. 131, 138 , 55 S.Ct. 24 , 79 L.Ed. 238 ; Van Meter v. Sanford, 5 Cir., 1938, 99 F.2d 511 ; Witte v.
Cited 14 timesPublishedSchool District No. 16-R v. McCormmach
238 Or. 51 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 17, 1964
See Cline v. Knight, 111 Colo 8, 137 P2d 680 ; Board of Trustees of Stanford Graded Common School Dist. v. Powell, 145 Ky 93, 140 SW 67 . … We held in Smith v.
Cited 3 timesPublished10 L.R.A. 670 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 17, 1890
. § 383; O’Connor v. Gifford, 6 Dem. R. 71; Stites v. Burch, 5 Paine Ch. 132; Brown v. Brown, 53 Barb. 217 ; Irwin v. Backus, 25 Cal. 214 , 85 Am. Dec. 125 .) And the decision of this court in Adams v.
Cited 7 timesPublished342 Or. 61 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 14, 2006
(board). … Marshall’s Towing v. Department of State Police, 339 Or 54, 62 , 116 P3d 873 (2005).
Cited 20 timesPublishedIn Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Farris
229 Or. 209 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 13, 1961
Fuller-Toponce Truck Co. v. … In re Irwin, 162 Or 221 , 91 P2d 518 ; State v. Mannix, supra; State v. Estes, supra; State v. Garland, 77 Or 92 , 150 P 289 ; In re Moynihan, supra.
Cited 29 timesPublishedJohnson v. School District No. 12
210 Or. 585 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 19, 1957
ORS 332.070; Stackpole v. School District No. 5, 9 Or 508 ; Barrow v. School District No. 8, 83 Or 272 , 162 P 789 ; Jacobberger v. School District No. 1, 114 Or 575 , 235 P 277 ; Boyle v. … Livesley v. Johnston, 45 Or 30, 47 , 76 P 13, 946 ; Lumberman’s Nat. Bank v. Minor, 65 Or 412, 416 , 133 P 87 ; Strode v. Smith, 66 Or 163, 180-182 , 131 P 1032 .
Cited 10 timesPublishedAlexander v. School District No. 1
84 Or. 172 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 1, 1917
It contained no such provision as in our enactment requiring teachers to serve where they are placed by the board. For instance, in People v. Board of Education, 174 N. Y. 169 ( 66 N. … The New Jersey cases of which Machaelis v. Board of Fire Commissioners, 49 N. J.
Cited 8 timesPublishedBeneficiaries of the Estate of Strametz v. Spectrum Motorwerks, Inc.
325 Or. 439 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 3, 1997
See Boise Cascade Corp. v. … Because the Board’s finding to that effect was based on substantial evidence in the record, that finding is binding on this court on review. ORS 656.298(6); ORS 183.482(7) & (8); Garcia v.
Cited 7 timesPublished294 Or. 588 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 22, 1983
A Board referee held the claim to be compensable. The employer challenged the referee’s determination before the Board and lost. … That history and purpose was recently examined by this court in Bracke v. Baza’r, 294 Or 483 , 658 P2d 1158 (1983), and we shall not repeat that examination here.
Cited 6 timesPublishedSchool District Number Two v. Lambert
28 Or. 209 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 4, 1895
“If the demand for which the warrant is drawn,” says Norton, J., in Keller v. … “The duty is ministerial, ” says Clopton, J., in Grider v. Tally, 77 Ala. 422 ( 54 Am.
Cited 41 timesPublished127 Or. 235 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 19, 1928
*237 BROWN, J. … “To Oregon Surety & Casualty Company, “Board of Trade Building*, “Portland, Oregon.”
Cited 17 timesPublishedRoberts v. TriQuint Semiconductor, Inc.
Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 10, 2015
CTS Corp. v. … Ross v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedStone Logging & Contracting Co. v. International Woodworkers
171 Or. 13 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 19, 1943
National Labor Relations Board v. Mason Mfg. Co., 126 F. (2d) 810, February 13, 1942. … National Labor Relations Board v. Remington Rand, Inc., supra, 94 F. 2d at page 869 . ’ ’ National Labor Relations Board v. Dahlstrom Metallic Door Go., 112 F. (2d) 756, June 17, 1940.
Cited 6 timesPublished24 Or. 461 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 24, 1893
City Council of Montgomery, 65 Ala. *463 403 ; Lincoln v. City of Worcester, 8 Cush. 55 . … Bank v. Jordan, 16 Or. 113 ( 17 Pac. 621 ); Or. & Cal. R. R. Co. v. Lane Co. 23 Or. 385 ( 31 Pac. 964 ).
Cited 7 timesPublishedStackpole v. School District No. 5
9 Or. 508 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1881
But before the board of directors can audit a claim and draw their order on the clerk for the amount, the claim must have been presented to them'. … (Forbes v. School District, 10 Wis., 118 .)
Cited 8 timesPublished105 Or. 319 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 25, 1922
Co. v. Barlow, 3 Or. 311 ; Oregon R. & N. Co. v. Eastlack, 54 Or. 196, 202 ( 102 Pac. 1011 , 20 Ann. Cas. 692); Portland-Oregon City R. R. Co. v. Penny, 81 Or. 81, 85 ( 158 Pac. 404 ); South Park Commrs. v. … The board as officials of the state are bound by the act.
Cited 27 timesPublishedElmore Packing Co. v. Tillamook County
55 Or. 218 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 28, 1909
.; Southern Oregon Co. v. Coos Co., 30 Or. 250 ( 47 Pac. 852 ) ; Fisher v. Union County, 43 Or. 223 ( 72 Pac. 797 ) ; Holmes v. Cole, 51 Or. 483 ( 94 Pac. 964 .) 2. … City of Portland, 25 Or. 297 ( 35 Pac. 665 ) ; Oregon Coal Co. v. Coos Bay, 30 Or. 308 ( 47 Pac. 850 .) 5. As stated in Garnsey v.
Cited 7 timesPublished
Ask Donna