Case law

Adelsperger v. Elkside Development LLC

374 Or. 375 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 2, 2025

376 Adelsperger v. … Barnett Resorts, LLC (defendant) has petitioned for reconsideration of our decision in Adelsperger v.

Todd v. Bigham

238 Or. 374 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 10, 1964

Dist., 173 Cal 660, 161 P 113 ; Miller & Lux Inc. v. Secara, 193 Cal 755, 764, 227 P 171 ; Miller & Lux v. Board of Supervisors, supra, 189 Cal at 262. We think that OES 548.115 affords a similar right. … Dist. v.

Adams v. Corvallis & E. R. Co.

78 Or. 117 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 9, 1915

Brown & McCabe, 53 Or. 598 ( 101 Pac. 671 ); Brown v. Oregon Lumber Co., 24 Or. 317 ( 33 Pac. 557 ). … Marshall, 43 Or. 438, 444 ( 73 Pac. 330 ); Galvin v. Brown & McCabe, 53 Or. 598 ( 101 Pac. 671 ).

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Haws

310 Or. 741 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 26, 1990

Before the formal complaint was filed, the State Professional Responsibility Board had petitioned this court for the temporary suspension of the accused during the pendency of the disciplinary proceedings. … In re Brown, 298 Or 285, 297 , 692 P2d 107 (1984) (absent briefing, argument, and authority, court decides Bar proceeding does not come within the meaning of “administration of justice”).

Livesay v. Dearmond

131 Or. 563 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 30, 1929

And from State v. … Co. v. Wisconsin R.

Southern Oregon Co. v. Coos Co.

30 Or. 250 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 23, 1897

Co. v. Am. Press Ass’n, 102 Ala. 475 ( 15 South, 947 , 950); Wood v. Lake, 3 Colo. App. 284 ( 33 Pac. 80 ); Harrison v. Chipp, 25 Ill. 575 ; Chambers v. Lewis, 9 Iowa, 583 ; People v. … Sup. 941; People v. Board of Assessors, 32 N. Y. Sup. 344; Brandon v. Superior Court, 60 Cal. 576 .

In re Willow Creek

74 Or. 592 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 20, 1914

It might be said that the duties of the water board are quasi judicial in their character. Such duties may be devolved by law on boards whose principal duties are administrative. As said in Reetz v. Michigan, 188 U. … Delegation of powers to boards or commissions has generally been sustained by the courts throughout the country: Oregon R. & N. Co. v. Campbell (C. C.), 173 Fed. 957 ; Portland Ry., L. & P. Co. v.

Sims v. Sowle

238 Or. 329 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 10, 1964

Brown, to apologize to him, and he apologized to him and he apologized to Mrs. Brown for causing whatever trouble it was, and he told me then that he wanted to get ahold of Mr. Sims to apologize to him.” … Brown and the barmaid, tended to show an unprovoked assault upon the plaintiff by the defendant.

Union Fishermen's Co-op. Packing Co. v. Point Adams Packing Co.

108 Or. 535 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 31, 1923

Immediately above this scroll and between the head and foot boards of the “bedstead” is embossed in large gilt capitals the word “Salmon,” and underneath is printed in black capitals, “Every Can Guaranteed.” … Co. v. A. Y. McDonaly & Morrison Mfg.

Alexander v. School District No. 1

84 Or. 172 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 1, 1917

It contained no such provision as in our enactment requiring teachers to serve where they are placed by the board. For instance, in People v. Board of Education, 174 N. Y. 169 ( 66 N. … The New Jersey cases of which Machaelis v. Board of Fire Commissioners, 49 N. J.

Saylor v. Enterprise Electric Co.

110 Or. 231 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 22, 1924

BROWN, J. … Why use a board? “A.

Larson v. State Compensation Department

251 Or. 478 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 25, 1968

The Board ordered the claim closed. Later, the Board reopened the claim to permit the claimant to file the required written opinion. Thereafter, Lawrence J. … This court held in Coday v.

In Re Hayes' Estate

161 Or. 1 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 7, 1938

R. 498. *16 In Brown v. Houston, 114 U. S. 622 , 29 L. Ed. 257 , 5 S. … The period of his ownership was brief, possibly no longer than five days, but in Brown v. Houston, supra, American Steel & Wire Co. v. Speed, supra, General Oil Co. v. Crain, supra, Bacon v.

SAIF Corp. v. Dubose

335 Or. 579 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 7, 2003

In Mabon v. … In Norton v.

Teel v. Weyerhaeuser Co.

294 Or. 588 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 22, 1983

A Board referee held the claim to be compensable. The employer challenged the referee’s determination before the Board and lost. … That history and purpose was recently examined by this court in Bracke v. Baza’r, 294 Or 483 , 658 P2d 1158 (1983), and we shall not repeat that examination here.

State v. Hawk

105 Or. 319 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 25, 1922

Co. v. Barlow, 3 Or. 311 ; Oregon R. & N. Co. v. Eastlack, 54 Or. 196, 202 ( 102 Pac. 1011 , 20 Ann. Cas. 692); Portland-Oregon City R. R. Co. v. Penny, 81 Or. 81, 85 ( 158 Pac. 404 ); South Park Commrs. v. … The board as officials of the state are bound by the act.

Baker v. STEELE

229 Or. 498 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 13, 1961

The board had jurisdiction to make the determination, and Baker failed to demonstrate wherein the pro *501 ceedings were irregular. Bechtold et al. v. Wilson et al., 182 Or 360 , 186 P2d 525 , 187 P2d 675 . … Bechtold et al. v. Wilson et al., supra. The city charter admittedly gives the civil service board jurisdiction to decide disputes concerning seniority.

Steel v. Holladay

10 L.R.A. 670 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 17, 1890

. § 383; O’Connor v. Gifford, 6 Dem. R. 71; Stites v. Burch, 5 Paine Ch. 132; Brown v. Brown, 53 Barb. 217 ; Irwin v. Backus, 25 Cal. 214 , 85 Am. Dec. 125 .) And the decision of this court in Adams v.

Van Koten v. State Industrial Accident Commission

110 Or. 574 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 18, 1924

This excerpt is cited with approval in Galvin v. Brown & McCabe, 53 Or. 598, 608 ( 101 Pac. 671 ). In Farrin v. State Industrial Acc. Com., 104 Or. 452 *580 ( 205 Pac. 984 ), Mr. … Justice Brown considered the identical question under consideration in the instant case quoted, with approval, the above excerpt from Galvin v. Brown & McCabe, 53 Or. 598 ( 101 Pac. 671 ).

State v. Scharf

288 Or. 451 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 22, 1980

Flores, 280 Or 273, 279 , 570 P2d 965 (1977); Brown v. Multnomah County Dist. Ct., 280 Or 95 , 570 P2d 52 (1977); State v. Ivory, 278 Or 499, 503 , 564 P2d 1039 *455 (1977); State v. … Brown v. Multnomah County Dist. Ct., supra.