Case law

Rooney v. Kulongoski

322 Or. 15 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 28, 1995

Nelson v. … Brown v. Roberts, 309 Or 667, 669 , 791 P2d 488 (1990).

Portland v. Parker

69 Or. 271 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 10, 1914

v. … [Mass.] 172; Brown v. County Commissioners, 21 Pa. 42 ; State v. Fitzporter, 17 Mo. App. 273 ; Fosdick v. Village of Perrysburg, 14 Ohio St. 485 , 486; Sedgwick, Statutory Law, 123.”

Kiernan v. Kratz

42 Or. 474 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 25, 1902

In Brown v. Weber, 38 N. Y. 187 , the rule announced in Mallory v. Gillett, 21 N. … Thus, in Browne v. Curtiss, 2 N.

Kollock v. Barnard

116 Or. 694 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 7, 1926

J. 772, § 415; Gibbons v. Hood River Irr. Dist., 66 Or. 208, 210 ( 133 Pac. 772 ); City of Astoria v. Cornelius (Or.), 240 Pac. 233 . *703 Section 7326, Or. … This question was considered by this court in the case of Noble v.

Tompkins v. Portland Ry., L. & P. Co.

77 Or. 174 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 27, 1915

should have been given: Zurcher v. … Supp. 490 ); Dudley v. Front Street Cable Ry. Co. (C. C.), 73 Fed. 128 ; Devroe v. Portland R., L. & P. Co., 64 Or. 547, 556 ( 131 Pac. 304 ). 3.

Mundt v. PETERSON

211 Or. 293 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 18, 1957

Oregon Coal & Navigation Co. v. Coos County, 30 Or 308 , 47 P 851 , and Smith v. City of Portland, 25 Or 297 , 35 P 665 . It is, therefore, law questions that are analyzed and decided on writ of review. Cur- *297 ran v. … Lafferty v. Newbry, 200 Or 685 , 268 P2d 589 ; Kelsey v. Norblad, 136 Or 76 , 298 P 199 ; and Spencer v. City of Portland, 114 Or 381 , 235 P 279 .

Quillen v. Schimpf

133 Or. 581 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 13, 1930

*586 BROWN, J. The defendants assert that the plaintiff abandoned his possession of the real property involved herein. … Brown, 36 Or. 218 ( 56 P. 170 ).

Hendryx v. School District No. 4

148 Or. 83 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 12, 1934

R. 1033; Ansorge v. Green Bay, 198 Wis. 320 ( 224 N. W. 119 ); Backie v. Cromwell Consol. School Dist., 186 Minn. 38 ( 242 N. W. 389 ); Guilford School Tp. v. Roberts, 28 Ind. App. 355 ( 62 N. E. 711 ); Short v. … J. 401, 403, §§ 337, 338 and 340; Ansorge v. Green Bay, supra; Backie v. Cromwell Consol. School Dist., supra; Guilford School Tp. v. Roberts, *89 supra; Funston v.

Burkitt v. School District No. 1

195 Or. 471 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 3, 1952

Caddo Parish School Board, 57 F Supp 508 ; Wayland v. Board of School Directors, 43 Wash 441, 86 P 642 ; Wilson v. Board of Education, 233 Ill 464, 84 NE 697 , 15 LRA (ns) 1136; Antell v. … In Coggins v. Board of Education, Wayland v. Board of School Directors, Wilson v. Board of Education, and Wilson v.

Vsetecka v. Safeway Stores, Inc.

337 Or. 502 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 14, 2004

Vsetecka v. Safeway Stores, Inc., 183 Or App 239 , 51 P3d 688 (2002). We hold that the board and the Court of Appeals read the notice statute too narrowly and that claimant’s notice was sufficient. … Stevens v. Czerniak, 336 Or 392, 401 , 84 P3d 140 (2004). Context includes other provisions of the same statute. Id.

Toole v. EBI Companies

314 Or. 102 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 20, 1992

See Chocktoot v. … In Johnson v.

PETERS v. McKAY

195 Or. 412 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 14, 1951

Sprague et al, 166 Or 320 , 111 P2d 1031 ; Engle v. State Land Board, 164 Or 109 , 99 P2d 1018 ; and see United Contracting Co. v. Duby, 134 Or 1 , 292 P 309 . … Hanger v. Abbott, supra. In Brown v. Hiatts, 15 Wallace 177, the plaintiff, a citizen and resident of Virginia, loaned money to the defendant, a resident of Kansas, in 1860.

Jansen v. Atiyeh

302 Or. 314 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 3, 1986

This case began as an action by motel and hotel operators, taxi drivers and caterers in the Ashland area against the Oregon State Board of Higher Education (defendant 1 ) acting by and through Southern Oregon State College … The order of the Court of Appeals is affirmed. 1 Although many persons originally were made defendants, the State Board of Higher Education is the party against which attorney fees were awarded. 2 It is interesting to note

Oregon & Cal. R. R. v. Jackson County

38 Or. 589 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 25, 1901

E. 629 ); Lefferts v. Board of Supervisors, 21 Wis. *688; Hersey v. Board of Supervisors, 37 Wis. 75 ; Brauns v. City of Green Bay, 55 Wis. 113 ( 12 N. W. 463 ); Merrill v. … Cos. v. Board of Equalizers, 85 Fed. 302 ; Cotting v. Kansas City Stock-Yards Co., 82 Fed. 850 .

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Farris

229 Or. 209 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 13, 1961

Fuller-Toponce Truck Co. v. … In re Irwin, 162 Or 221 , 91 P2d 518 ; State v. Mannix, supra; State v. Estes, supra; State v. Garland, 77 Or 92 , 150 P 289 ; In re Moynihan, supra.

Smith v. Kelly

24 Or. 464 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 10, 1893

Co. v. … In Clegg v.

State Ex Rel. Thomas v. Hoss

143 Or. 41 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 7, 1933

Newcomb v. McCall, 94 N. Y. 587 ; Board of Commissioners v. Lindeman, 165 Ind. 186 ( 73 N. E. 912 ); Toronto v. Salt Lake County, 10 Utah 410 ( 37 P. 587 ); Lewis’ Sutherland Statutory Construction, p. 546, § 284. … . v.

DiBrito v. SAIF Corp.

319 Or. 244 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 23, 1994

SAIF appealed to the Workers’ Compensation Board (Board). Relying on SAIF v. … We allowed review and now reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals, reverse the order of the Board, and remand the case to the Board. In Mathel v.

Stark-Davis Co. v. Fellows

129 Or. 281 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 27, 1929

Co. v. Williams. In Main etc. Co. v. Horton etc. … J., and Brown and Belt, JJ., concur.

Jones v. Marshall-Wells Co.

104 Or. 388 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 18, 1922

The method of shipment was prescribed and the place of delivery free on board was likewise an additional element not theretofore mentioned. This was followed by an inquiry about the guaranty of delivery. … Bean, Brown and McCourt, JJ., concur.